Tube task hand preference in captive hylobatids.

The link between laterality in humans and other primates is still hotly debated. Hylobatids have been rather neglected in this research area, yet they can provide important insights because: (1) they share with humans a complex vocal repertoire, which in humans is thought to be associated with brain hemispheric specialization and lateralized behaviors; (2) their adaptation to arboreality has produced unique postural constraints; (3) the little that is known about laterality in gibbons is contradictory (captive studies have provided conflicting results, while a field study on siamangs reported a population-level left-hand preference). To clarify this, we investigated hand preference in captive hylobatids [n = 42; 22 siamangs (Symphalangus syndactylus) and 20 gibbons (Hylobates sp., Nomascus leucogenys)] in nine Japanese facilities. We had a large sample size, controlled for possible confounds (posture, enclosure limitations) and used a well-established testing protocol (tube task). Handedness indices calculated from raw frequencies and bouts were highly correlated and showed a significant left-hand skew, which is consistent with data from wild siamangs. Major differences between captive and wild siamangs were a larger number of ambiguously handed individuals, and no significant age-related variation in captivity. The use of the index finger elicited a much more strongly lateralized response than the thumb. These results confirmed a left-hand preference in siamangs, but were equivocal in other hylobatids, and suggest selective pressures that may have acted on the highly arboreal hylobatids to favor handedness. Our study also indicates factors that might explain the discrepancy in the literature between handedness studies on captive and wild primate populations.