Literature DB >> 28341494

How do patients choose between active surveillance, radical prostatectomy, and radiotherapy? The effect of a preference-sensitive decision aid on treatment decision making for localized prostate cancer.

Romy E D Lamers1, Maarten Cuypers2, Marieke de Vries3, Lonneke V van de Poll-Franse4, J L H Ruud Bosch5, Paul J M Kil6.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the effect of a decision aid (DA) on treatment preferences and to investigate which patient preferences are important for final treatment preferences. We also determined if the patient׳s treatment decision was influenced by the urologist׳s treatment preference. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between August 2014 and July 2015, newly diagnosed patients with low-/intermediate-risk prostate cancer were offered to use a web-based DA after diagnosis. Treatment preferences and patient׳s values were extracted from the DA. Urologists׳ treatment preferences were indicated at the time of inclusion.
RESULTS: We included 181 patients, of whom 21% preferred active surveillance, 33% radical prostatectomy, 10% brachytherapy, 3% external beam radiotherapy, and 34% did not indicate a specific preferred treatment option after DA use (missing N = 6). Among 67%, treatment preference before DA use did not change after DA use. In men who chose active surveillance after DA use, 97% (37/38) preferred to postpone unnecessary treatment. For radical prostatectomy, 91% (52/57) of the patients valued tumor removal, and for brachytherapy, 88% (15/17) valued incontinence worse than bowel complaints. For 64% (missing N = 21) of the patients, urologists indicated one specific preferred treatment option as most suitable for the patient concerned. Agreement between final treatment decision and urologist׳s preference was lower (κ = 0.68) than between final treatment decision and preferred treatment after DA use (κ = 0.82).
CONCLUSION: Most patients with prostate cancer chose the treatment in accordance with the post-DA preference and to a lesser extent the urologists preference; implications of this are prospectively investigated in an ongoing study.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Decision aid; Decision making; Patient preferences; Prostate cancer; Treatment

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28341494     DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2016.09.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urol Oncol        ISSN: 1078-1439            Impact factor:   3.498


  12 in total

Review 1.  Treatment preferences in human papillomavirus-associated oropharyngeal cancer.

Authors:  Melina J Windon; Gypsyamber D'Souza; Carole Fakhry
Journal:  Future Oncol       Date:  2018-09-28       Impact factor: 3.404

2.  Decision Aids: The Role of the Patient in Perioperative Safety.

Authors:  Warren A Southerland; Luis E Tollinche; Fred E Shapiro
Journal:  Int Anesthesiol Clin       Date:  2019

Review 3.  eHealth Interventions for Dutch Cancer Care: Systematic Review Using the Triple Aim Lens.

Authors:  Liza van Deursen; Anke Versluis; Rosalie van der Vaart; Lucille Standaar; Jeroen Struijs; Niels Chavannes; Jiska J Aardoom
Journal:  JMIR Cancer       Date:  2022-06-14

Review 4.  Towards an Organ-Sparing Approach for Locally Advanced Esophageal Cancer.

Authors:  Berend Jan van der Wilk; Ben M Eyck; Manon C W Spaander; Roelf Valkema; Sjoerd M Lagarde; Bas P L Wijnhoven; J Jan B van Lanschot
Journal:  Dig Surg       Date:  2018-09-18       Impact factor: 2.588

Review 5.  Interventions that Facilitate Shared Decision-Making in Cancers with Active Surveillance as Treatment Option: a Systematic Review of Literature.

Authors:  G E Collée; B J van der Wilk; J J B van Lanschot; J J Busschbach; L Timmermans; S M Lagarde; L W Kranenburg
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2020-07-28       Impact factor: 5.075

6.  Comparing Perspectives of Canadian Men Diagnosed With Prostate Cancer and Health Care Professionals About Active Surveillance.

Authors:  Margaret Fitch; Veronique Ouellet; Kittie Pang; Simone Chevalier; Darrel E Drachenberg; Antonio Finelli; Jean-Baptiste Lattouf; Carmen Loiselle; Alan So; Simon Sutcliffe; Simon Tanguay; Fred Saad; Anne-Marie Mes-Masson
Journal:  J Patient Exp       Date:  2020-06-11

Review 7.  Empowering patients in decision-making in radiation oncology - can we do better?

Authors:  Michelle Leech; Matthew S Katz; Joanna Kazmierska; Julie McCrossin; Sandra Turner
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2020-04-13       Impact factor: 6.603

8.  Impact of a web-based prostate cancer treatment decision aid on patient-reported decision process parameters: results from the Prostate Cancer Patient Centered Care trial.

Authors:  Maarten Cuypers; Romy E D Lamers; Paul J M Kil; Lonneke V van de Poll-Franse; Marieke de Vries
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2018-05-12       Impact factor: 3.603

9.  Impact of Health-related Quality of Life and Prediagnosis Risk of Major Depressive Disorder on Treatment Choice in Low- and Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Hannah Riskin-Jones; Tristan Grogan; Amar Kishan; Ann Raldow
Journal:  Eur Urol Open Sci       Date:  2020-10-10

10.  Differences in treatment choices between prostate cancer patients using a decision aid and patients receiving care as usual: results from a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Romy E D Lamers; Maarten Cuypers; Marieke de Vries; Lonneke V van de Poll-Franse; J L H Ruud Bosch; Paul J M Kil
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2021-07-17       Impact factor: 4.226

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.