Literature DB >> 28341417

Poor knowledge of age-related fertility decline and assisted reproduction among healthcare professionals.

Désirée García1, Rita Vassena2, Andrés Prat3, Valérie Vernaeve4.   

Abstract

Reproduction is a matter of concern for individuals and society due to the postponement of childbearing, and healthcare professionals are the main source of information and counselling. This study aims to evaluate how knowledgeable healthcare professionals are about fertility and assisted reproduction, and to explore attitudes towards social oocyte freezing. A cross-sectional study was performed with 201 professionals (gynaecologists, physicians and nurses) from four public centres in Spain. Participants completed a survey about fertility, IVF, oocyte donation (OD) and social oocyte freezing, between May 2013 and March 2014. Reported mean age limits for pregnancy were 39.5 ± 4.5 (spontaneously), 43.7 ± 5.2 (IVF) and 49.0 ± 6.5 (OD). Gynaecologists reported a younger limit for spontaneous and IVF pregnancies (P < 0.001); 36.1% reported a limit for a spontaneous pregnancy >39, compared with 77.3% of other physicians and 72.9% of nurses. Regarding social oocyte freezing, 41.8% of gynaecologists thought it should be offered to every young woman, versus 62.7% of other physicians and 48.9% of nurses (P = 0.041). In conclusion, gynaecologists are more knowledgeable about fertility and assisted reproduction, while more restrictive towards social oocyte freezing. Knowledge and attitudes could influence the quality of information and counselling given to patients.
Copyright © 2016 Reproductive Healthcare Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  age-related infertility; assisted reproduction; fertility knowledge; motherhood; social oocyte freezing

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28341417     DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2016.09.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online        ISSN: 1472-6483            Impact factor:   3.828


  6 in total

1.  Regulating reproductive genetic services: dealing with spiral-shaped processes and techno-scientific imaginaries.

Authors:  Ido Alon; Rosa Urbanos-Garrido; José Guimón
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 2.  What do people know about fertility? A systematic review on fertility awareness and its associated factors.

Authors:  Juliana Pedro; Tânia Brandão; Lone Schmidt; Maria E Costa; Mariana V Martins
Journal:  Ups J Med Sci       Date:  2018-06-29       Impact factor: 2.384

3.  Initiating patient discussions about oocyte cryopreservation: Attitudes of obstetrics and gynaecology resident physicians.

Authors:  B Peterson; C Gordon; J K Boehm; M C Inhorn; P Patrizio
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Soc Online       Date:  2018-11-07

Review 4.  Advanced Maternal Age in IVF: Still a Challenge? The Present and the Future of Its Treatment.

Authors:  Filippo Maria Ubaldi; Danilo Cimadomo; Alberto Vaiarelli; Gemma Fabozzi; Roberta Venturella; Roberta Maggiulli; Rossella Mazzilli; Susanna Ferrero; Antonio Palagiano; Laura Rienzi
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2019-02-20       Impact factor: 5.555

5.  Night Shift Among Women: Is It Associated With Difficulty Conceiving a First Birth?

Authors:  Renae C Fernandez; Vivienne M Moore; Jennifer L Marino; Melissa J Whitrow; Michael J Davies
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2020-12-01

6.  (Not) talking about fertility: the role of digital technologies and health services in helping plan pregnancy. A qualitative study.

Authors:  Rebecca S French; Jill Shawe; Nerissa Tilouche; Sarah Earle; Pippa Grenfell
Journal:  BMJ Sex Reprod Health       Date:  2020-12-23
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.