Literature DB >> 28341052

Factors associated with intramammary infection in dairy cows caused by coagulase-negative staphylococci, Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus uberis, Streptococcus dysgalactiae, Corynebacterium bovis, or Escherichia coli.

S Taponen1, E Liski2, A-M Heikkilä2, S Pyörälä3.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine risk factors for bovine intramammary infection (IMI) associated with the most common bacterial species in Finland. Large databases of the Finnish milk-recording system and results of microbiological analyses of mastitic milk samples from Valio Ltd. (Helsinki, Finland) were analyzed. The study group comprised 29,969 cows with IMI from 4,173 dairy herds. A cow with a quarter milk sample in which DNA of target species was detected in the PathoProof Mastitis PCR Assay (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA) was determined to have IMI. Only cows with IMI caused by the 6 most common pathogens or groups of pathogens, coagulase-negative staphylococci (CNS), Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus uberis, Streptococcus dysgalactiae, Corynebacterium bovis, and Escherichia coli, were included. The control group comprised 160,176 IMI-free cows from the same herds as the study group. A multilevel logistic regression model was used to study herd- and cow-specific risk factors for incidence of IMI. Pathogen-specific results confirmed those of earlier studies, specifically that increasing parity increases prevalence of IMI regardless of causative pathogen. Holsteins were more susceptible to IMI than Nordic Reds except when the causative pathogen was CNS. Occurrence of IMI caused by C. bovis was not related to milk yield, in contrast to IMI caused by all other pathogens investigated. Organic milk production was associated with IMI only when the causative pathogen of IMI was Staph. aureus; Staph. aureus IMI was more likely to occur in conventional than in organic production. Cows in older freestall barns with parlor milking had an increased probability of contracting an IMI compared with cows in tiestall barns or in new freestall barns with automatic milking. This was the case for all IMI, except those caused by CNS, the prevalence of which was not associated with the milking system, and IMI caused by Staph. aureus, which was most common in cows housed in tiestall barns. A better breeding index for milk somatic cell count was associated with decreased occurrence of IMI, indicating that breeding for improved udder health has been successful in reducing the incidence of IMI caused by the most common pathogens in Finland. In the Finnish dairy sector, the importance of other measures to control IMI will increase as the Holstein breed progressively takes the place of the Nordic Red breed. Attention should be paid to hygiene and cleanliness, especially in old freestall barns. Based on our results, the increasing prevalence of automatic milking is not a reason for special concern.
Copyright © 2017 American Dairy Science Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bovine mastitis; dairy cow; pathogen; polymerase chain reaction assay; risk factor

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28341052     DOI: 10.3168/jds.2016-11465

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dairy Sci        ISSN: 0022-0302            Impact factor:   4.034


  22 in total

1.  Bacterial isolation of milk samples submitted from clinical mastitis buffaloes during 2007 to 2016.

Authors:  P S Bhutia; B K Bansal; D K Gupta; Raj Sukhbir Singh; S K Uppal
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2019-02-21       Impact factor: 1.559

Review 2.  Subclinical mastitis in dairy cows in south-Asian countries: a review of risk factors and etiology to prioritize control measures.

Authors:  Md Saiful Bari; Md Mizanur Rahman; Ylva Persson; Marjolein Derks; Md Abu Sayeed; Delower Hossain; Shuvo Singha; Md Ahasanul Hoque; Subramnian Sivaraman; Palika Fernando; Ijaz Ahmad; Abdul Samad; Gerrit Koop
Journal:  Vet Res Commun       Date:  2022-06-14       Impact factor: 2.816

3.  Phenotypic antimicrobial susceptibility of environmental bacteria from mastitic milk of pastured dairy cows of S. Miguel (Azores).

Authors:  João Simões; M Branco; J Andrade; A Müller
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2019-08-02       Impact factor: 1.559

4.  Influence of bovine sub-clinical mastitis and associated risk factors on calving interval in a population of crossbred lactating cows in Sri Lanka.

Authors:  R Rahularaj; R M C Deshapriya; R M S B K Ranasinghe
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2019-06-11       Impact factor: 1.893

5.  Bacteriological etiology and treatment of mastitis in Finnish dairy herds.

Authors:  Johanna Vakkamäki; Suvi Taponen; Anna-Maija Heikkilä; Satu Pyörälä
Journal:  Acta Vet Scand       Date:  2017-05-25       Impact factor: 1.695

6.  Prevalence of subclinical mastitis in Finnish dairy cows: changes during recent decades and impact of cow and herd factors.

Authors:  Heidi Hiitiö; Johanna Vakkamäki; Heli Simojoki; Tiina Autio; Jouni Junnila; Sinikka Pelkonen; Satu Pyörälä
Journal:  Acta Vet Scand       Date:  2017-04-20       Impact factor: 1.695

7.  Dynamics of somatic cell count and intramammary infection in lactating dairy cows.

Authors:  S M Mostafizur Rahaman Sumon; Mst Sonia Parvin; Md Amimul Ehsan; Md Taohidul Islam
Journal:  J Adv Vet Anim Res       Date:  2020-04-25

Review 8.  Staphylococcus aureus in Agriculture: Lessons in Evolution from a Multispecies Pathogen.

Authors:  Soyoun Park; Jennifer Ronholm
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2021-02-10       Impact factor: 26.132

9.  Performance of the StaphGold ELISA test in determining subclinical Staphylococcus aureus infections in dairy cows using a Gaussian mixture model.

Authors:  Danchen Aaron Yang; Richard Anthony Laven
Journal:  Vet Med Sci       Date:  2022-03-25

10.  Comparative genome analysis of 24 bovine-associated Staphylococcus isolates with special focus on the putative virulence genes.

Authors:  Suvi Taponen; Ravi Kant; Airi Palva; Joanna Koort; Silja Åvall-Jääskeläinen; Lars Paulin; Jochen Blom
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-03-30       Impact factor: 2.984

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.