| Literature DB >> 28340906 |
Abstract
Veterans Treatment Courts (VTCs) were created to: (1) address issues unique to U.S. Military Veterans; and, (2) where possible, avoid punishing veterans for crimes that may have been committed as a direct result of their mental conditions (e.g., Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) and/or Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI)). Little research has been undertaken to ascertain whether VTCs are accomplishing their intended goals. To that end, the present case study examined three operating VTCs in order to determine if they are meeting their objectives. The research provides further information about VTC operations and recidivism rates. The research further reveals that, while the three VTCs examined are arguably benefitting veterans, they are not reaching a greater part of the population due largely to the gatekeeping role of VTC prosecutors, and the rigid eligibility requirements established by the three VTCs for veteran participation. Consequently, it's possible that the low recidivism rates reported by the three VTCs examined are inflated or constitute false positives.Entities:
Keywords: Recidivism; Therapeutic courts; Veterans; Veterans treatment courts
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 28340906 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2016.10.009
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Law Psychiatry ISSN: 0160-2527