Literature DB >> 28340006

Benefit of biologics initiation in moderate versus severe rheumatoid arthritis: evidence from a United States registry.

Arthur Kavanaugh1, Edward Keystone2, Jeffrey D Greenberg3,4, George W Reed4,5, Jenny M Griffith6, Alan W Friedman6, Katherine C Saunders4, Arijit Ganguli6.   

Abstract

Objectives: To compare clinical outcomes and treatment patterns among patients with moderate vs severe RA following biologic DMARD initiation.
Methods: Biologics-naive patients with moderate to severe RA [Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) >10] who initiated a biologic DMARD were selected from the Corrona registry (2001-13). CDAI, functional status [modified HAQ (mHAQ)] and patterns of drug use were compared at 1 and 2 years post-initiation between patients with moderate (CDAI >10⩽22) vs severe (CDAI >22) baseline disease activity.
Results: A total of 1596 patients (817 severe, 779 moderate) had ⩾1 year of follow-up and 1269 (635 severe, 634 moderate) had ⩾2 years of follow-up. Patients with severe vs moderate baseline disease activity experienced greater improvements in disease activity [mean change in CDAI -18.9 vs -6.0 at year 1; -21.0 vs -7.1 at year 2 ( P < 0.0001)] and physical function [mean change in mHAQ -0.2 vs -0.1 ( P < 0.0001) at year 1; -0.2 vs -0.1 ( P = 0.0013) at year 2]. Greater proportions of patients with moderate vs severe disease activity achieved remission (CDAI ⩽2.8) [22.7 vs 15.8% ( P = 0.0003) at year 1; 25.9 vs 20.9% ( P = 0.0396) at year 2] or low disease activity (CDAI <10) [60.1 vs 41.2% at year 1; 66.7 vs 49.4% at year 2 ( P < 0.0001)]. Most patients remained on the original biologic drug (>70% at year 1; >62% at year 2).
Conclusion: With biologic therapy, RA patients with higher baseline disease activity achieved greater improvements in measures of disease activity than those with lower levels of disease, but less often achieved the common targets of remission or low disease activity.
© The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com

Entities:  

Keywords:  biologics; clinical outcomes; disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs; rheumatoid arthritis; treatment patterns

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28340006     DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/kex042

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)        ISSN: 1462-0324            Impact factor:   7.580


  4 in total

1.  Effectiveness, Tolerability, and Safety of Tofacitinib in Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Retrospective Analysis of Real-World Data from the St. Gallen and Aarau Cohorts.

Authors:  Ruediger B Mueller; Caroline Hasler; Florian Popp; Frederik Mattow; Mirsada Durmisi; Alexander Souza; Paul Hasler; Andrea Rubbert-Roth; Hendrik Schulze-Koops; Johannes von Kempis
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2019-09-26       Impact factor: 4.241

2.  Direct healthcare resource utilisation, health-related quality of life, and work productivity in patients with moderate rheumatoid arthritis: an observational study.

Authors:  James Galloway; Julie Edwards; Shweta Bhagat; Ben Parker; Ai Lyn Tan; James Maxwell; Mike Wallington; Sophee Blanthorn-Hazell; Claire Bellamy; Zoe Cole
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2021-03-13       Impact factor: 2.362

3.  Qualitative and psychometric approaches to evaluate the PROMIS pain interference and sleep disturbance item banks for use in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Brandon Becker; Kimberly Raymond; Carol Hawkes; April Mitchell Foster; Andrew Lovley; Cory Saucier; Avery A Rizio; Jakob Bue Bjorner; Mark Kosinski
Journal:  J Patient Rep Outcomes       Date:  2021-07-06

Review 4.  Unlocking the Value of Anti-TNF Biosimilars: Reducing Disease Burden and Improving Outcomes in Chronic Immune-Mediated Inflammatory Diseases: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Mourad F Rezk; Burkhard Pieper
Journal:  Adv Ther       Date:  2020-08-01       Impact factor: 3.845

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.