Meredith N Zozus1, Angel Lazarov2, Leigh R Smith3, Tim E Breen4, Susan L Krikorian5, Patrick S Zbyszewski6, Shelly K Knoll7, Debra A Jendrasek8, Derek C Perrin9, Demetris N Zambas10, Tremaine B Williams1, Carl F Pieper11. 1. Department of Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA. 2. Boston Biomedical, Boston MA, USA. 3. Merck GP3S, Philadelphia PA, USA. 4. Hoosier Cancer Research Network, Indianapolis, IN, USA. 5. Relypsa Inc, Redwood City, CA, USA. 6. Onconova Therapeutics Inc, Newtown, PA, USA. 7. Roche, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. 8. Chiltern International Limited, Wilmington, NC, USA. 9. Astellas Pharma, Northbrook, IL, USA. 10. Novartis, East Hanover, NJ, USA. 11. Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To assess and refine competencies for the clinical research data management profession. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Based on prior work developing and maintaining a practice standard and professional certification exam, a survey was administered to a captive group of clinical research data managers to assess professional competencies, types of data managed, types of studies supported, and necessary foundational knowledge. RESULTS: Respondents confirmed a set of 91 professional competencies. As expected, differences were seen in job tasks between early- to mid-career and mid- to late-career practitioners. Respondents indicated growing variability in types of studies for which they managed data and types of data managed. DISCUSSION: Respondents adapted favorably to the separate articulation of professional competencies vs foundational knowledge. The increases in the types of data managed and variety of research settings in which data are managed indicate a need for formal education in principles and methods that can be applied to different research contexts (ie, formal degree programs supporting the profession), and stronger links with the informatics scientific discipline, clinical research informatics in particular. CONCLUSION: The results document the scope of the profession and will serve as a foundation for the next revision of the Certified Clinical Data Manager TM exam. A clear articulation of professional competencies and necessary foundational knowledge could inform the content of graduate degree programs or tracks in areas such as clinical research informatics that will develop the current and future clinical research data management workforce.
OBJECTIVE: To assess and refine competencies for the clinical research data management profession. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Based on prior work developing and maintaining a practice standard and professional certification exam, a survey was administered to a captive group of clinical research data managers to assess professional competencies, types of data managed, types of studies supported, and necessary foundational knowledge. RESULTS: Respondents confirmed a set of 91 professional competencies. As expected, differences were seen in job tasks between early- to mid-career and mid- to late-career practitioners. Respondents indicated growing variability in types of studies for which they managed data and types of data managed. DISCUSSION: Respondents adapted favorably to the separate articulation of professional competencies vs foundational knowledge. The increases in the types of data managed and variety of research settings in which data are managed indicate a need for formal education in principles and methods that can be applied to different research contexts (ie, formal degree programs supporting the profession), and stronger links with the informatics scientific discipline, clinical research informatics in particular. CONCLUSION: The results document the scope of the profession and will serve as a foundation for the next revision of the Certified Clinical Data Manager TM exam. A clear articulation of professional competencies and necessary foundational knowledge could inform the content of graduate degree programs or tracks in areas such as clinical research informatics that will develop the current and future clinical research data management workforce.
Authors: Boyd M Knosp; Catherine K Craven; David A Dorr; Elmer V Bernstam; Thomas R Campion Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2022-03-15 Impact factor: 7.942