Literature DB >> 28339665

An evaluation of a public-private partnership to reduce artificial trans fatty acids in England, 2011-16.

C Knai1, L James1, M Petticrew1, E Eastmure1, M A Durand1, N Mays1.   

Abstract

Background: The Public Health Responsibility Deal (RD) is a public-private partnership in England involving voluntary pledges between government, and business and other public organizations to improve public health. One such voluntary pledge refers to the reduction of trans fatty acids (TFAs) in the food supply in England by either pledging not to use artificial TFAs or pledging artificial TFA removal. This paper evaluates the RD's effectiveness at encouraging signatory organizations to remove artificially produced TFAs from their products.
Methods: We analysed publically available data submitted by RD signatory organizations. We analysed their plans and progress towards achieving the TFAs pledge, comparing 2015 progress reports against their delivery plans. We also assessed the extent to which TFAs reductions beyond pre-2011 levels could be attributed to the RD.
Results: Voluntary reformulation via the RD has had limited added value, because the first part of the trans fat pledge simply requires organizations to confirm that they do not use TFAs and the second part, that has the potential to reduce use, has failed to attract the participation of food producers, particularly those producing fast foods and takeaways, where most remaining use of artificial TFAs is located. Conclusions: The contribution of the RD TFAs pledges in reducing artificial TFAs from England's food supply beyond pre-2011 levels appears to be negligible. This research has wider implications for the growing international evidence base voluntary food policy, and offers insights for other countries currently undertaking work to remove TFAs from their food supply.
© The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Public Health Association. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28339665     DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/ckx002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Public Health        ISSN: 1101-1262            Impact factor:   3.367


  4 in total

1.  Changes in the amount of nutrient of packaged foods and beverages after the initial implementation of the Chilean Law of Food Labelling and Advertising: A nonexperimental prospective study.

Authors:  Marcela Reyes; Lindsey Smith Taillie; Barry Popkin; Rebecca Kanter; Stefanie Vandevijvere; Camila Corvalán
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2020-07-28       Impact factor: 11.069

2.  Making hospital shops healthier: evaluating the implementation of a mandatory standard for limiting food products and promotions in hospital retail outlets.

Authors:  Martine Stead; Douglas Eadie; Jennifer McKell; Leigh Sparks; Andy MacGregor; Annie S Anderson
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2020-01-30       Impact factor: 3.295

3.  The case for developing a cohesive systems approach to research across unhealthy commodity industries.

Authors:  Cécile Knai; Mark Petticrew; Simon Capewell; Rebecca Cassidy; Jeff Collin; Steven Cummins; Elizabeth Eastmure; Patrick Fafard; Niamh Fitzgerald; Anna B Gilmore; Ben Hawkins; Jørgen Dejgård Jensen; Srinivasa Vittal Katikireddi; Nason Maani; Nicholas Mays; Modi Mwatsama; Rima Nakkash; Jim F Orford; Harry Rutter; Natalie Savona; May C I van Schalkwyk; Heide Weishaar
Journal:  BMJ Glob Health       Date:  2021-02

4.  Systems Thinking as a Framework for Analyzing Commercial Determinants of Health.

Authors:  Cécile Knai; Mark Petticrew; Nicholas Mays; Simon Capewell; Rebecca Cassidy; Steven Cummins; Elizabeth Eastmure; Patrick Fafard; Benjamin Hawkins; Jørgen Dejgård Jensen; Srinivasa Vittal Katikireddi; Modi Mwatsama; Jim Orford; Heide Weishaar
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 4.911

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.