Literature DB >> 28339527

Microbial community mapping in intestinal tract of broiler chicken.

Yingping Xiao1,2, Yun Xiang3, Weidong Zhou4, Jinggang Chen1,2, Kaifeng Li1,2, Hua Yang1,2.   

Abstract

Domestic chickens are valuable sources of protein associated with producing meat and eggs for humans. The gastrointestinal tract (GIT) houses a large microbial community, and these microbiota play an important role in growth and health of chickens, contributing to the enhancement of nutrient absorption and improvement of the birds' immune systems. To improve our understanding of the chicken intestinal microbial composition, microbiota inhabiting 5 different intestinal locations (duodenum, jejunum, ileum, cecum, and colon) of 42-day-old broiler chickens were detected based on 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis. As a result, 1,502,554 sequences were clustered into 796 operational taxonomic units (OTUs) at the 97% sequence similarity value and identified into 15 phyla and 288 genera. Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria, and Cyanobacteria were the major microbial groups and Firmicutes was the dominant phylum in duodenum, jejunum, ileum and colon accounting for > 60% of sequences, while Bacteroidetes was the dominant phylum in cecum (>50% of sequences), but little in the other four gut sections. At the genus level, the major microbial genera across all gut sections were Lactobacillus, Enterococcus, Bacteroides, and Corynebacterium. Lactobacillus was the predominant genus in duodenum, jejunum, and ileum (>35%), but was rarely present in cecum, and Bacteroides was the most dominant group in cecum (about 40%), but rarely present in the other 4 intestinal sections. Differences of microbial composition between the 5 intestinal locations might be a cause and consequence of gut functional differences and may also reflect host selection mediated by innate or adaptive immune responses. All these results could offer some information for the future study on the relationship between intestinal microbiota and broiler chicken growth performance as well as health.
© 2016 Poultry Science Association Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  16S rRNA; Illumina MiSeq; broiler chicken; intestine; microbiota composition

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28339527     DOI: 10.3382/ps/pew372

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Poult Sci        ISSN: 0032-5791            Impact factor:   3.352


  51 in total

1.  Chicken Intestinal Mycobiome: Initial Characterization and Its Response to Bacitracin Methylene Disalicylate.

Authors:  Kelsy Robinson; Yingping Xiao; Timothy J Johnson; Binlong Chen; Qing Yang; Wentao Lyu; Jing Wang; Nicole Fansler; Sage Becker; Jing Liu; Hua Yang; Guolong Zhang
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2020-06-17       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Bacillus subtilis Strain DSM 29784 Modulates the Cecal Microbiome, Concentration of Short-Chain Fatty Acids, and Apparent Retention of Dietary Components in Shaver White Chickens during Grower, Developer, and Laying Phases.

Authors:  Mohamed Neijat; Jemaneh Habtewold; Rob B Shirley; Alissa Welsher; James Barton; Pascal Thiery; Elijah Kiarie
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Bisdemethoxycurcumin attenuates lipopolysaccharide-induced intestinal damage through improving barrier integrity, suppressing inflammation, and modulating gut microbiota in broilers.

Authors:  Jingfei Zhang; Yuxiang Yang; Hongli Han; Lili Zhang; Tian Wang
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2021-11-01       Impact factor: 3.338

Review 4.  A Review of the Effects and Production of Spore-Forming Probiotics for Poultry.

Authors:  Igor V Popov; Ammar Algburi; Evgeniya V Prazdnova; Maria S Mazanko; Vladimir Elisashvili; Anzhelica B Bren; Vladimir A Chistyakov; Elizaveta V Tkacheva; Vladimir I Trukhachev; Irina M Donnik; Yuri A Ivanov; Dmitry Rudoy; Alexey M Ermakov; Richard M Weeks; Michael L Chikindas
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 2.752

Review 5.  Chicken Gut Microbiome and Human Health: Past Scenarios, Current Perspectives, and Futuristic Applications.

Authors:  Utkarsh Sood; Vipin Gupta; Roshan Kumar; Sukanya Lal; Derek Fawcett; Supriya Rattan; Gerrard Eddy Jai Poinern; Rup Lal
Journal:  Indian J Microbiol       Date:  2019-02-08       Impact factor: 2.461

6.  Antibiotic resistance, antimicrobial residues, and bacterial community diversity in pasture-raised poultry, swine, and beef cattle manures.

Authors:  Michael James Rothrock; Byeng Ryel Min; Lana Castleberry; Heidi Waldrip; David Parker; David Brauer; Dipti Pitta; Nagaraju Indugu
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2021-08-01       Impact factor: 3.159

7.  Impact of multi-strain probiotic, citric acid, garlic powder or their combinations on performance, ileal histomorphometry, microbial enumeration and humoral immunity of broiler chickens.

Authors:  Ahmed M Elbaz; Nashaat S Ibrahim; Abdelrazeq M Shehata; Noureldeen G Mohamed; Abdel-Moneim Eid Abdel-Moneim
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2021-01-12       Impact factor: 1.559

8.  Nano-Se Assimilation and Action in Poultry and Other Monogastric Animals: Is Gut Microbiota an Answer?

Authors:  Peter F Surai; Ivan I Kochish; Oksana A Velichko
Journal:  Nanoscale Res Lett       Date:  2017-12-04       Impact factor: 4.703

9.  Spatial Organization of the Gastrointestinal Microbiota in Urban Canada Geese.

Authors:  Sergei V Drovetski; Michael O'Mahoney; Emma J Ransome; Kenan O Matterson; Haw Chuan Lim; R Terry Chesser; Gary R Graves
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-02-27       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  The chicken gut metagenome and the modulatory effects of plant-derived benzylisoquinoline alkaloids.

Authors:  Peng Huang; Yan Zhang; Kangpeng Xiao; Fan Jiang; Hengchao Wang; Dazhi Tang; Dan Liu; Bo Liu; Yisong Liu; Xi He; Hua Liu; Xiubin Liu; Zhixing Qing; Conghui Liu; Jialu Huang; Yuwei Ren; Long Yun; Lijuan Yin; Qian Lin; Cheng Zeng; Xiaogang Su; Jingyang Yuan; Li Lin; Nanxi Hu; Hualiang Cao; Sanwen Huang; Yuming Guo; Wei Fan; Jianguo Zeng
Journal:  Microbiome       Date:  2018-11-27       Impact factor: 14.650

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.