Daiki Nakagomi1, Claire Cousins2, Jan Sznajd3, Shunsuke Furuta4, Aladdin J Mohammad5, Raashid Luqmani3, David Jayne6. 1. Lupus and Vasculitis Clinic, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals, Cambridge, UK. dnakagomi@hotmail.co.jp. 2. Department of Radiology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals, Cambridge, UK. 3. Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, Botnar Research Centre, University of Oxford, UK. 4. Department of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Chiba University Hospital, Chiba, Japan. 5. Lupus and Vasculitis Clinic, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals, Cambridge, UK; and Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund, Rheumatology, Lund, Sweden. 6. Lupus and Vasculitis Clinic, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals, Cambridge, UK.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Outcome assessment in large-vessel vasculitis (LVV) remains challenging and this impairs patient management and the conduct of clinical studies. Previous proposals for outcome tools have not included imaging. This study aimed to develop an imaging score to quantify damage in LVV and to assess the difference between Takayasu (TAK) and giant cell arteritis (GCA). METHODS: Ninety-six patients (41 TAK, 55 GCA) were identified from local registries at two University Hospitals in the UK. Radiologic lesions including stenosis, occlusion and aneurysm were evaluated in 25 arterial regions by enhanced computed tomography or magnetic resonance angiography. Lesion correlation with combined damage assessment scores was employed in a multiple regression analysis to define the weight of individual lesions and develop a damage index. RESULTS: A numerical damage index was developed: the "Combined Arteritis Damage Score (CARDS)". The index was derived from a formula: number of regions with mild stenosis × 0.6 + number of regions with moderate to severe stenosis × 1.2 + number with occlusions × 1.6 + number with aneurysms × 0.8 in 25 arterial regions. The median CARDS was higher in TAK than GCA (4.1 and 0.6, interquartile range 1.3-5.7 and 0-3, p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: We have developed a damage assessment tool, CARDS, based on imaging in LVV of potential value to clinical studies and patient management. TAK and GCA differ in the radiologic severity of disease.
OBJECTIVES: Outcome assessment in large-vessel vasculitis (LVV) remains challenging and this impairs patient management and the conduct of clinical studies. Previous proposals for outcome tools have not included imaging. This study aimed to develop an imaging score to quantify damage in LVV and to assess the difference between Takayasu (TAK) and giant cell arteritis (GCA). METHODS: Ninety-six patients (41 TAK, 55 GCA) were identified from local registries at two University Hospitals in the UK. Radiologic lesions including stenosis, occlusion and aneurysm were evaluated in 25 arterial regions by enhanced computed tomography or magnetic resonance angiography. Lesion correlation with combined damage assessment scores was employed in a multiple regression analysis to define the weight of individual lesions and develop a damage index. RESULTS: A numerical damage index was developed: the "Combined Arteritis Damage Score (CARDS)". The index was derived from a formula: number of regions with mild stenosis × 0.6 + number of regions with moderate to severe stenosis × 1.2 + number with occlusions × 1.6 + number with aneurysms × 0.8 in 25 arterial regions. The median CARDS was higher in TAK than GCA (4.1 and 0.6, interquartile range 1.3-5.7 and 0-3, p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: We have developed a damage assessment tool, CARDS, based on imaging in LVV of potential value to clinical studies and patient management. TAK and GCA differ in the radiologic severity of disease.
Authors: Christian Dejaco; Elisabeth Brouwer; Justin C Mason; Frank Buttgereit; Eric L Matteson; Bhaskar Dasgupta Journal: Nat Rev Rheumatol Date: 2017-09-14 Impact factor: 20.543
Authors: Dan Pugh; Maira Karabayas; Neil Basu; Maria C Cid; Ruchika Goel; Carl S Goodyear; Peter C Grayson; Stephen P McAdoo; Justin C Mason; Catherine Owen; Cornelia M Weyand; Taryn Youngstein; Neeraj Dhaun Journal: Nat Rev Dis Primers Date: 2022-01-06 Impact factor: 65.038
Authors: Stella Pui Yan Wong; Chi Chiu Mok; Chak Sing Lau; Man Lung Yip; Lai Shan Tam; King Yee Ying; Woon Leung Ng; Kam Hung Ng; Moon Ho Leung; Tsz Yan Lee; Chi Hung To; Ka Lai Lee; Man Choi Wan; Ka Lung Yu; Priscilla Ching Han Wong; Chi Keung Sung; Kwok Fai Lee; Emily Wai Lin Kun Journal: Rheumatol Int Date: 2018-09-04 Impact factor: 2.631
Authors: Maja Stojanovic; Sanvila Raskovic; Vladimir Milivojevic; Rada Miskovic; Ivan Soldatovic; Sanja Stankovic; Ivan Rankovic; Marija Stankovic Stanojevic; Sanja Dragasevic; Miodrag Krstic; Andreas P Diamantopoulos Journal: J Cardiovasc Dev Dis Date: 2021-12-14