Literature DB >> 28339285

Is the necrosis/wall ADC ratio useful for the differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions?

Irmak Durur-Subasi1, Afak Durur-Karakaya2, Adem Karaman3, Mehmet Seker2, Elif Demirci4, Fatih Alper3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the necrosis/wall apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) ratio is useful for the malignant-benign differentiation of necrotic breast lesions.
METHODS: Breast MRI was performed using a 3-T system. In this retrospective study, calculation of the necrosis/wall ADC ratio was based on ADC values measured from the necrosis and from the wall of malignant and benign breast lesions by diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI). By synchronizing post-contrast T1 weighted images, the separate parts of wall and necrosis were maintained. All the diagnoses were pathologically confirmed. Statistical analyses were conducted using an independent sample t-test and receiver operating characteristic analysis. The intraclass and interclass correlations were evaluated.
RESULTS: A total of 66 female patients were enrolled, 38 of whom had necrotic breast carcinomas and 28 of whom had breast abscesses. The ADC values were obtained from both the wall and necrosis. The mean necrosis/wall ADC ratio (± standard deviation) was 1.61 ± 0.51 in carcinomas, and it was 0.65 ± 0.33 in abscesses. The area under the curve values for necrosis ADC, wall ADC and the necrosis/wall ADC ratio were 0.680, 0.068 and 0.942, respectively. A wall/necrosis ADC ratio cut-off value of 1.18 demonstrated a sensitivity of 97%, specificity of 93%, a positive-predictive value of 95%, a negative-predictive value of 96% and an accuracy of 95% in determining the malignant nature of necrotic breast lesions. There was a good intra- and interclass reliability for the ADC values of both necrosis and wall.
CONCLUSION: The necrosis/wall ADC ratio appears to be a reliable and promising tool for discriminating breast carcinomas from abscesses using DWI. Advances in knowledge: ADC values of the necrosis obtained by DWI are valuable for malignant-benign differentiation in necrotic breast lesions. The necrosis/wall ADC ratio appears to be a reliable and promising tool in the breast imaging field.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28339285      PMCID: PMC5605106          DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20160803

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  25 in total

1.  Contribution of diffusion-weighted imaging to dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in the characterization of breast tumors.

Authors:  Sibel Kul; Aysegul Cansu; Etem Alhan; Hasan Dinc; Gurbuz Gunes; Abdulkadir Reis
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 3.959

2.  Is it better to include necrosis in apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) measurements? The necrosis/wall ADC ratio to differentiate malignant and benign necrotic lung lesions: Preliminary results.

Authors:  Adem Karaman; Irmak Durur-Subasi; Fatih Alper; Afak Durur-Karakaya; Mahmut Subasi; Metin Akgun
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2017-02-02       Impact factor: 4.813

3.  Diffusion-weighted imaging of the breast: principles and clinical applications.

Authors:  Reiko Woodhams; Saadallah Ramadan; Peter Stanwell; Satoko Sakamoto; Hirofumi Hata; Masanori Ozaki; Shinichi Kan; Yusuke Inoue
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2011 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.333

4.  Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value to evaluate BI-RADS 4 breast lesions: correlation with pathological findings.

Authors:  Yazmín Aseret Ramírez-Galván; Servando Cardona-Huerta; Elfa Ibarra-Fombona; Guillermo Elizondo-Riojas
Journal:  Clin Imaging       Date:  2014-10-16       Impact factor: 1.605

5.  The diagnostic value of diffusion-weighted imaging and the apparent diffusion coefficient values in the differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions.

Authors:  Gonca Çabuk; Meltem Nass Duce; Anıl Özgür; Feramuz Demir Apaydın; Ayşe Polat; Gülhan Orekici
Journal:  J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol       Date:  2015-01-07       Impact factor: 1.735

6.  Diffusion-weighted MR imaging: role in the differential diagnosis of breast lesions.

Authors:  C Altay; P Balci; S Altay; S Karasu; S Saydam; T Canda; O Dicle
Journal:  JBR-BTR       Date:  2014 Jul-Aug

7.  Value of MRI sequences for prediction of invasive breast carcinoma size.

Authors:  Irmak Durur-Subasi; Afak Durur-Karakaya; Adem Karaman; Elif Demirci; Fatih Alper; Elif Yılmazel-Ucar; Hamit Acemoglu; Mufide Nuran Akcay
Journal:  J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol       Date:  2014-07-04       Impact factor: 1.735

8.  Diffusion-weighted MRI of abscess formations in children and young adults.

Authors:  Henning Neubauer; Isabel Platzer; Verena Rabea Mueller; Thomas Meyer; Johannes Liese; Herbert Koestler; Dietbert Hahn; Meinrad Beer
Journal:  World J Pediatr       Date:  2012-08-12       Impact factor: 2.764

9.  Positive predictive value of BI-RADS MR imaging.

Authors:  Mary C Mahoney; Constantine Gatsonis; Lucy Hanna; Wendy B DeMartini; Constance Lehman
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2012-05-15       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Reading protocol for dynamic contrast-enhanced MR images of the breast: sensitivity and specificity analysis.

Authors:  Ruth M L Warren; Linda Pointon; Deborah Thompson; Rebecca Hoff; Fiona J Gilbert; Anwar Padhani; Doug Easton; Sunil R Lakhani; Martin O Leach
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology in Idiopathic Granulomatous Mastitis.

Authors:  Irmak Durur-Subasi
Journal:  Eurasian J Med       Date:  2019-08-05

2.  Diffusion-weighted imaging in ectopic pregnancy: ring of restriction sign.

Authors:  Afak Durur-Karakaya; Mehmet Seker; İrmak Durur-Subasi
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2017-10-27       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Preoperative predicting malignancy in breast mass-like lesions: value of adding histogram analysis of apparent diffusion coefficient maps to dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for improving confidence level.

Authors:  Hong-Li Liu; Min Zong; Han Wei; Jian-Juan Lou; Si-Qi Wang; Qi-Gui Zou; Hai-Bin Shi; Yan-Ni Jiang
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2017-09-06       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  q-Space Imaging Yields a Higher Effect Gradient to Assess Cellularity than Conventional Diffusion-weighted Imaging Methods at 3.0 T: A Pilot Study with Freshly Excised Whole-Breast Tumors.

Authors:  Nicholas Senn; Yazan Masannat; Ehab Husain; Bernard Siow; Steven D Heys; Jiabao He
Journal:  Radiol Imaging Cancer       Date:  2019-09-27

5.  How to Discriminate Lung Cancer From Benign Pulmonary Nodules and Masses? Usefulness of Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging With Apparent Diffusion Coefficient and Inside/Wall Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Ratio.

Authors:  Katsuo Usuda; Shun Iwai; Aika Yamagata; Yoshihito Iijima; Nozomu Motono; Mariko Doai; Munetaka Matoba; Keiya Hirata; Hidetaka Uramoto
Journal:  Clin Med Insights Oncol       Date:  2021-07-07

6.  Semi-Automatic MRI Feature Assessment in Small- and Medium-Volume Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia after Prostatic Artery Embolization.

Authors:  Vanessa F Schmidt; Mirjam Schirren; Maurice M Heimer; Philipp M Kazmierczak; Clemens C Cyran; Moritz Wildgruber; Max Seidensticker; Jens Ricke; Olga Solyanik
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-25
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.