Literature DB >> 28338711

The effects of age on crash risk associated with driver distraction.

Feng Guo1,2, Sheila G Klauer1, Youjia Fang1, Jonathan M Hankey1, Jonathan F Antin1, Miguel A Perez1, Suzanne E Lee1, Thomas A Dingus1.   

Abstract

Background: Driver distraction is a major contributing factor to crashes, which are the leading cause of death for the US population under 35 years of age. The prevalence of secondary-task engagement and its impacts on distraction and crashes may vary substantially by driver age.
Methods: Driving performance and behaviour data were collected continuously using multiple cameras and sensors in situ for 3542 participant drivers recruited for up to 3 years for the Second Strategic Highway Research Program Naturalistic Driving Study. Secondary-task engagement at the onset of crashes and during normal driving segments was identified from videos. A case-cohort approach was used to estimate the crash odds ratios associated with, and the prevalence of, secondary tasks for four age groups: 16-20, 21-29, 30-64 and 65-98 years of age. Only severe crashes (property damage and higher severity) were included in the analysis.
Results: Secondary-task-induced distraction posed a consistently higher threat for drivers younger than 30 and above 65 when compared with middle-aged drivers, although senior drivers engaged in secondary tasks much less frequently than their younger counterparts. Secondary tasks with high visual-manual demand (e.g. visual-manual tasks performed on cell phones) affected drivers of all ages. Certain secondary tasks, such as operation of in-vehicle devices and talking/singing, increased the risk for only certain age groups. Conclusions: Teenaged, young adult drivers and senior drivers are more adversely impacted by secondary-task engagement than middle-aged drivers. Visual-manual distractions impact drivers of all ages, whereas cognitive distraction may have a larger impact on young drivers.
© The Author 2016; all rights reserved. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Epidemiological Association

Entities:  

Keywords:  SHRP2 Naturalistic Driving Study; case–cohort; distraction; driver behaviour; traffic crash risk

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28338711     DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyw234

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0300-5771            Impact factor:   7.196


  13 in total

1.  Texting Bans, a Possibly Low-Cost and Effective Means to Help Improve Motor Vehicle Safety.

Authors:  Carol A Flannagan
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Texting-While-Driving Bans and Motor Vehicle Crash-Related Emergency Department Visits in 16 US States: 2007-2014.

Authors:  Alva O Ferdinand; Ammar Aftab; Marvellous A Akinlotan
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2019-03-21       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Distracted Driving and Risk of Crash or Near-Crash Involvement Among Older Drivers Using Naturalistic Driving Data With a Case-Crossover Study Design.

Authors:  Carrie Huisingh; Cynthia Owsley; Emily B Levitan; Marguerite R Irvin; Paul MacLennan; Gerald McGwin
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2019-03-14       Impact factor: 6.053

4.  Risk factors of mobile phone use while driving in Queensland: Prevalence, attitudes, crash risk perception, and task-management strategies.

Authors:  Oscar Oviedo-Trespalacios; Mark King; Md Mazharul Haque; Simon Washington
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-09-06       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Driving scene-based driving errors in brain injury patients and their relevance to cognitive-perceptual function and functional activity level: A cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Myoung-Ok Park
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 1.817

6.  Commentary: The Incidence of Road Traffic Crashes Among Young People Aged 15-20 Years: Differences in Behavior, Lifestyle and Sociodemographic Indices in the Galilee and the Golan.

Authors:  Gerry Leisman; Igor Waksman
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2021-03-04

7.  Cellphone laws and teens' calling while driving: analysis of repeated cross-sectional surveys in 2013, 2015, 2017, and 2019.

Authors:  Li Li; Caitlin N Pope; Rebecca R Andridge; Julie K Bower; Guoqing Hu; Motao Zhu
Journal:  Inj Epidemiol       Date:  2020-12-03

8.  Mobility management to prevent, reduce, or delay driving a car in teenagers.

Authors:  Aimee Ward; Sharon R Lewis; Harold Weiss
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-08-16

9.  The Alabama VIP older driver study rationale and design: examining the relationship between vision impairment and driving using naturalistic driving techniques.

Authors:  Cynthia Owsley; Gerald McGwin; Jonathan F Antin; Joanne M Wood; Jennifer Elgin
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-02-07       Impact factor: 2.209

10.  An Evaluation of Executive Control Function and Its Relationship with Driving Performance.

Authors:  Lirong Yan; Tiantian Wen; Jiawen Zhang; Le Chang; Yi Wang; Mutian Liu; Changhao Ding; Fuwu Yan
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-04       Impact factor: 3.576

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.