| Literature DB >> 28338610 |
Federica Cioffi1, Rosalba Senese2, Pasquale Lasala3, Angela Ziello4, Arianna Mazzoli5, Raffaella Crescenzo6, Giovanna Liverini7, Antonia Lanni8, Fernando Goglia9, Susanna Iossa10.
Abstract
Evidence indicates that many forms of fructose-induced metabolic disturbance are associated with oxidative stress and mitochondrial dysfunction. Mitochondria are prominent targets of oxidative damage; however, it is not clear whether mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) damage and/or its lack of repair are events involved in metabolic disease resulting from a fructose-rich diet. In the present study, we evaluated the degree of oxidative damage to liver mtDNA and its repair, in addition to the state of oxidative stress and antioxidant defense in the liver of rats fed a high-fructose diet. We used male rats feeding on a high-fructose or control diet for eight weeks. Our results showed an increase in mtDNA damage in the liver of rats fed a high-fructose diet and this damage, as evaluated by the expression of DNA polymerase γ, was not repaired; in addition, the mtDNA copy number was found to be significantly reduced. A reduction in the mtDNA copy number is indicative of impaired mitochondrial biogenesis, as is the finding of a reduction in the expression of genes involved in mitochondrial biogenesis. In conclusion, a fructose-rich diet leads to mitochondrial and mtDNA damage, which consequently may have a role in liver dysfunction and metabolic diseases.Entities:
Keywords: fructose-rich diet; mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA); mitochondrial biogenesis; oxidative damage; repair mechanisms
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28338610 PMCID: PMC5409662 DOI: 10.3390/nu9040323
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 5.717
Composition of experimental diets.
| Component (g 100 g−1) | Control Diet | Fructose Diet |
|---|---|---|
| Standard chow * | 50.5 | 50.5 |
| Sunflower oil | 1.5 | 1.5 |
| Casein | 9.2 | 9.2 |
| Alphacel | 9.8 | 9.8 |
| Starch | 20.4 | - |
| Fructose | - | 20.4 |
| Water | 6.4 | 6.4 |
| AIN-76 mineral mix | 1.6 | 1.6 |
| AIN-76 vitamin mix | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Choline | 0.1 | 0.1 |
| Methionine | 0.1 | 0.1 |
| Gross energy density, KJ·g−1 | 17.2 | 17.2 |
| Protein, % metabolisable energy | 29.0 | 29.0 |
| Lipids, % metabolisable energy | 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Carbohydrates, % metabolisable energy | 60.4 | 60.4 |
| Of which: Fructose | - | 30.0 |
| Starch | 52.8 | 22.8 |
| Sugars | 7.6 | 7.6 |
* Mucedola 4RF21; Italy.
Body weight, plasma, and hepatic parameters in rats fed a control or a fructose-rich diet.
| Item | Control | Fructose |
|---|---|---|
| Initial body weight, g | 470 ± 10 | 470 ± 10 |
| Final body weight, g | 540 ± 23 | 545 ± 15 |
| Food intake, g·day−1 | 32 ± 1.0 | 32 ± 1.0 |
| Plasma ALT, U·L−1 | 16.8 ± 1.0 | 27.3 ± 1.0 * |
| Plasma AST, U·L−1 | 43.0 ± 3.1 | 65.2 ± 3.3 * |
| Hepatic lipid peroxidation, nmol TBARS·g−1 liver | 61.5 ± 2.1 | 75.9 ± 2.0 * |
| Hepatic MPO activity, U·mg−1 liver | 0.31 ± 0.01 | 0.62 ± 0.02 * |
Values are the means ± SEM of nine different rats. * p < 0.05 compared to control diet. ALT = alanine transaminase, AST = aspartate transaminase, TBARS = thiobarbituric acid reactive substances, MPO = mieloperoxidase.
Figure 1Effect of fructose-rich diet on plasma 8-hydroxy-2′-deoxyguanosine (8-OHdG) levels. Values represent means ± SEM from five rats in each group. C: control diet; F: fructose-rich diet. * p < 0.05 versus C rats.
Figure 2Effect of fructose-rich diet on catalase expression in isolated liver mitochondria. Upper panel: representative Western blot with mitochondrial catalase (mtCAT) antibody using voltage-dependent anion channel (VDAC) as an internal control. Lower panel: quantitative analysis of Western blot. Values are presented as means ± SEM from six rats in each group. C: control diet; F: fructose-rich diet. * p < 0.05 versus C rats.
Figure 3Effect of fructose-rich diet on mtDNA damage and lesion frequency. (A) mtDNA damage was evaluated in the liver by amplifying long (13.4 Kbp) and short (235 bp) mtDNA fragments by QPCR; (B) Frequency of mtDNA lesions per 10 Kbp per strand. Values are presented as means ± SEM from four rats in each group. C: control diet; F: fructose-rich diet. * p < 0.05 versus C rats.
Figure 4Effect of a fructose-rich diet on mtDNA copy number. mtDNA copy number was assessed by quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction in 10 ng of genomic liver DNA using primers for mtCOII. Expression was normalized using nuclear β-actin as an internal control. Values are presented as means ± SEM from four rats in each group. C: control diet; F: fructose-rich diet. * p < 0.05 versus C rats.
Figure 5Effect of fructose-rich diet on DNA polymerase γ (POLG) expression. (a) POLG mRNA expression was measured by quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction using β-actin as an internal control. Values represent means ± SEM from four rats in each group; (b,c) Quantitative analysis and representative Western blot with POLG antibody using β-actin as an internal control. Values represent means ± SEM from nine rats in each group. C: control diet; F: fructose-rich diet. * p < 0.05 versus C rats.
Figure 6Effect of fructose-rich diet on peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ coactivator-1α (PGC1α), nuclear respiratory factors (NRF)-1, and mitochondrial transcription factor A (TFAM) expression. (a) Pgc1α, Nrf1 and Tfam mRNA expression was measured by quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction using β-actin as an internal control. Values are presented as means ± SEM from four rats in each group. C: control diet; F: fructose-rich diet. * p < 0.05 versus C rats; (b,c) quantitative analysis and representative Western blot with PGC1α, NRF1 and TFAM antibodies using β-ACTIN as an internal control. Values are presented as means ± SEM from six rats in each group. C: control diet; F: fructose-rich diet. * p < 0.05 versus C rats.