Literature DB >> 28338361

Method-Induced Differences of Energy Contributions in Women's Kayaking.

Yongming Li, Margot Niessen, Xiaoping Chen, Ulrich Hartmann.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Different relative aerobic energy contribution (WAER%) has been reported for the 2 women's Olympic kayaking disciplines (ie, 200 and 500 m).
PURPOSE: To investigate whether the adopted method of energy calculation influences the value of WAER% during kayaking time trials.
METHODS: Eleven adolescent female kayakers (age 14 ± 1 y, height 172 ± 4 cm, body mass 65.4 ± 4.2 kg, VO2peak 42.6 ± 4.9 mL·min-1·kg-1, training experience 1.5 ± 0.3 y) volunteered to participate in 1 incremental exercise test and 2 time trials (40 and 120 s) on the kayak ergometer. A portable spirometric system was used to measure gas metabolism. Capillary blood was taken from the ear lobe during and after the tests and analyzed for lactate afterward. The method of modified maximal accumulated oxygen deficit (m-MAOD) and the method based on the fast component of oxygen-uptake off-kinetics (PCr-La-O2) were used to calculate the energy contributions.
RESULTS: The anaerobic energy portions from m-MAOD were lower than those from PCr-La-O2 in the 40-s (41.9 ± 8.8 vs 52.8 ± 4.0 kJ, P > .05) and 120-s (64.1 ± 27.9 vs 68.2 ± 10.0 kJ, P > .05) time trials, which induced differences of WAER% between m-MAOD and PCr-La-O2 (36.0% vs 30.0% in 40 s, P > .05; 60.9% vs 57.5% in 120 s, P > .05).
CONCLUSIONS: The reported different WAER% in women's Olympic kayaking could be partly attributed to the adopted method of energy calculation (ie, m-MAOD vs PCr-La-O2). A fixed method of energy calculation is recommended during the longitudinal assessment on the relative energy contribution in women's Olympic kayaking.

Entities:  

Keywords:  fast component; modified maximal accumulated oxygen deficit; overestimate; time trial

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28338361     DOI: 10.1123/ijspp.2016-0491

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Sports Physiol Perform        ISSN: 1555-0265            Impact factor:   4.010


  3 in total

1.  Energetics of Floor Gymnastics: Aerobic and Anaerobic Share in Male and Female Sub-elite Gymnasts.

Authors:  Sebastian Kaufmann; Martin Ziegler; Jana Werner; Christine Noe; Richard Latzel; Stefan Witzany; Ralph Beneke; Olaf Hoos
Journal:  Sports Med Open       Date:  2022-01-10

2.  Comparison of Physiological and Perceptional Responses to 5-m Forward, Forward-Backward, and Lateral Shuttle Running.

Authors:  Chong Gao; Xiaolu Wang; Guochao Zhang; Li Huang; Mengyuan Han; Bo Li; George P Nassis; Yongming Li
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-02-17       Impact factor: 4.566

3.  Comparison of Energy Contributions and Workloads in Male and Female Badminton Players During Games Versus Repetitive Practices.

Authors:  Yue Fu; Yu Liu; Xiaoping Chen; Yongming Li; Bo Li; Xinxin Wang; Yang Shu; Lei Shang
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2021-06-24       Impact factor: 4.566

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.