Literature DB >> 28338323

Shape-Dependent Radiosensitization Effect of Gold Nanostructures in Cancer Radiotherapy: Comparison of Gold Nanoparticles, Nanospikes, and Nanorods.

Ningning Ma, Fu-Gen Wu, Xiaodong Zhang, Yao-Wen Jiang, Hao-Ran Jia, Hong-Yin Wang, Yan-Hong Li, Peidang Liu, Ning Gu, Zhan Chen1.   

Abstract

The shape effect of gold (Au) nanomaterials on the efficiency of cancer radiotherapy has not been fully elucidated. To address this issue, Au nanomaterials with different shapes but similar average size (∼50 nm) including spherical gold nanoparticles (GNPs), gold nanospikes (GNSs), and gold nanorods (GNRs) were synthesized and functionalized with poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) molecules. Although all of these Au nanostructures were coated with the same PEG molecules, their cellular uptake behavior differed significantly. The GNPs showed the highest cellular responses as compared to the GNSs and the GNRs (based on the same gold mass) after incubation with KB cancer cells for 24 h. The cellular uptake in cells increased in the order of GNPs > GNSs > GNRs. Our comparative studies indicated that all of these PEGylated Au nanostructures could induce enhanced cancer cell-killing rates more or less upon X-ray irradiation. The sensitization enhancement ratios (SERs) calculated by a multitarget single-hit model were 1.62, 1.37, and 1.21 corresponding to the treatments of GNPs, GNSs, and GNRs, respectively, demonstrating that the GNPs showed a higher anticancer efficiency than both GNSs and GNRs upon X-ray irradiation. Almost the same values were obtained by dividing the SERs of the three types of Au nanomaterials by their corresponding cellular uptake amounts, indicating that the higher SER of GNPs was due to their much higher cellular uptake efficiency. The above results indicated that the radiation enhancement effects were determined by the amount of the internalized gold atoms. Therefore, to achieve a strong radiosensitization effect in cancer radiotherapy, it is necessary to use Au-based nanomaterials with a high cellular internalization. Further studies on the radiosensitization mechanisms demonstrated that ROS generation and cell cycle redistribution induced by Au nanostructures played essential roles in enhancing radiosensitization. Taken together, our results indicated that the shape of Au-based nanomaterials had a significant influence on cancer radiotherapy. The present work may provide important guidance for the design and use of Au nanostructures in cancer radiotherapy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  X-ray radiotherapy; anticancer; gold nanostructures; radiosensitizing effect; shape-dependent

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28338323     DOI: 10.1021/acsami.7b01112

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ACS Appl Mater Interfaces        ISSN: 1944-8244            Impact factor:   9.229


  34 in total

1.  Hyaluronic acid-modified polyamidoamine dendrimer G5-entrapped gold nanoparticles delivering METase gene inhibits gastric tumor growth via targeting CD44+ gastric cancer cells.

Authors:  Yi-Fan Li; Hou-Ting Zhang; Lin Xin
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 4.553

2.  Effect of gold nanoparticles on radiation doses in tumor treatment: a Monte Carlo study.

Authors:  H A Al-Musywel; A Laref
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2017-09-25       Impact factor: 3.161

3.  Cross-Correlative Single-Cell Analysis Reveals Biological Mechanisms of Nanoparticle Radiosensitization.

Authors:  Tyron Turnbull; Michael Douglass; Nathan H Williamson; Douglas Howard; Richa Bhardwaj; Mark Lawrence; David J Paterson; Eva Bezak; Benjamin Thierry; Ivan M Kempson
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2019-04-29       Impact factor: 15.881

4.  One Pot Synthesis of PEGylated Bimetallic Gold-Silver Nanoparticles for Imaging and Radiosensitization of Oral Cancers.

Authors:  Shameer Ahmed; Gunjan Baijal; Rudrappa Somashekar; Subramania Iyer; Vijayashree Nayak
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2021-10-21

5.  Histological Injury to Rat Brain, Liver, and Kidneys by Gold Nanoparticles is Dose-Dependent.

Authors:  Bekhti Sari Fadia; Nassima Mokhtari-Soulimane; Bensalah Meriem; Nacer Wacila; Badi Zouleykha; Rouigueb Karima; Tewfik Soulimane; Syed A M Tofail; Helen Townley; Nanasaheb D Thorat
Journal:  ACS Omega       Date:  2022-06-07

6.  Dual radiosensitization and anti-STAT3 anti-proliferative strategy based on delivery of gold nanoparticle - oligonucleotide nanoconstructs to head and neck cancer cells.

Authors:  Surong Zhang; Suresh Gupta; Thomas J Fitzgerald; Alexei A Bogdanov
Journal:  Nanotheranostics       Date:  2018-01-01

Review 7.  Recent Advances in Cancer Therapy Based on Dual Mode Gold Nanoparticles.

Authors:  Ellas Spyratou; Mersini Makropoulou; Efstathios P Efstathopoulos; Alexandros G Georgakilas; Lembit Sihver
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2017-12-19       Impact factor: 6.639

Review 8.  Engineering nanoparticles to reprogram radiotherapy and immunotherapy: recent advances and future challenges.

Authors:  Jing Jin; Qijie Zhao
Journal:  J Nanobiotechnology       Date:  2020-05-14       Impact factor: 10.435

9.  Intracellular Delivery of Doxorubicin by Iron Oxide-Based Nano-Constructs Increases Clonogenic Inactivation of Ionizing Radiation in HeLa Cells.

Authors:  Roxana Cristina Popescu; Diana Iulia Savu; Miriam Bierbaum; Adriana Grbenicek; Frank Schneider; Hiltraud Hosser; Bogdan Ștefan Vasile; Ecaterina Andronescu; Frederik Wenz; Frank A Giordano; Carsten Herskind; Marlon R Veldwijk
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-06-24       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 10.  Metal-based NanoEnhancers for Future Radiotherapy: Radiosensitizing and Synergistic Effects on Tumor Cells.

Authors:  Yan Liu; Pengcheng Zhang; Feifei Li; Xiaodong Jin; Jin Li; Weiqiang Chen; Qiang Li
Journal:  Theranostics       Date:  2018-02-12       Impact factor: 11.556

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.