Literature DB >> 28338210

Testing food-related inhibitory control to high- and low-calorie food stimuli: Electrophysiological responses to high-calorie food stimuli predict calorie and carbohydrate intake.

Kaylie A Carbine1, Edward Christensen2, James D LeCheminant2, Bruce W Bailey2, Larry A Tucker2, Michael J Larson1,3.   

Abstract

Maintaining a healthy diet has important implications for physical and mental health. One factor that may influence diet and food consumption is inhibitory control-the ability to withhold a dominant response in order to correctly respond to environmental demands. We examined how N2 amplitude, an ERP that reflects inhibitory control processes, differed toward high- and low-calorie food stimuli and related to food intake. A total of 159 participants (81 female; M age = 23.5 years; SD = 7.6) completed two food-based go/no-go tasks (one with high-calorie and one with low-calorie food pictures as no-go stimuli) while N2 amplitude was recorded. Participants recorded food intake using the Automated Self-Administered 24-hour Dietary Recall system. Inhibiting responses toward high-calorie stimuli elicited a larger (i.e., more negative) no-go N2 amplitude; inhibiting responses toward low-calorie stimuli elicited a smaller no-go N2 amplitude. Participants were more accurate during the high-calorie than low-calorie task, but took longer to respond on go trials toward high-calorie rather than low-calorie stimuli. When controlling for age, gender, and BMI, larger high-calorie N2 difference amplitude predicted lower caloric intake (β = 0.17); low-calorie N2 difference amplitude was not related to caloric intake (β = -0.03). Exploratory analyses revealed larger high-calorie N2 difference amplitude predicted carbohydrate intake (β = 0.22), but not protein (β = 0.08) or fat (β = 0.11) intake. Results suggest that withholding responses from high-calorie foods requires increased recruitment of inhibitory control processes, which may be necessary to regulate food consumption, particularly for foods high in calories and carbohydrates.
© 2017 Society for Psychophysiological Research.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ASA24; ERPs; N2; food intake; food-related inhibitory control

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28338210     DOI: 10.1111/psyp.12860

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychophysiology        ISSN: 0048-5772            Impact factor:   4.016


  4 in total

1.  Food product health warnings promote dietary self-control through reductions in neural signals indexing food cue reactivity.

Authors:  Daniel H Rosenblatt; Patrick Summerell; Alyssa Ng; Helen Dixon; Carsten Murawski; Melanie Wakefield; Stefan Bode
Journal:  Neuroimage Clin       Date:  2018-03-07       Impact factor: 4.881

2.  Food-Specific Inhibitory Control Mediates the Effect of Disgust Sensitivity on Body Mass Index.

Authors:  Xing Liu; Ji Li; Ofir Turel; Rui Chen; Qinghua He
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2019-10-22

3.  Implicit food odour priming effects on reactivity and inhibitory control towards foods.

Authors:  Marine Mas; Marie-Claude Brindisi; Claire Chabanet; Stéphanie Chambaron
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-06-09       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Deficits in response inhibition on varied levels of demand load in anorexia nervosa: an event-related potentials study.

Authors:  Ling Yue; Yingying Tang; Qing Kang; Qian Wang; Jijun Wang; Jue Chen
Journal:  Eat Weight Disord       Date:  2018-08-28       Impact factor: 4.652

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.