| Literature DB >> 28338062 |
Saleem J Denholme1, Akinori Yukawa1, Kohei Tsumura1, Masanori Nagao2, Ryuji Tamura3, Satoshi Watauchi2, Isao Tanaka2, Hideaki Takayanagi1, Nobuaki Miyakawa1.
Abstract
We present the first experimental evidence for metallicity, superconductivity (SC) and the co-existence of charge density waves (CDW) in the quasi-one-dimensional material HfTe3. The existence of such phenomena is a typical characteristic of the transition metal chalcogenides however, without the application of hydrostatic pressure/chemical doping, it is rare for a material to exhibit the co-existence of both states. Materials such as HfTe3 can therefore provide us with a unique insight into the relationship between these multiple ordered states. By improving on the original synthesis conditions, we have successfully synthesised single phase HfTe3 and confirmed the resultant structure by performing Rietveld refinement. Using low temperature resistivity measurements, we provide the first experimental evidence of SC at ~1.4 K as well as a resistive anomaly indicative of a CDW formation at ~82 K. By the application of hydrostatic-pressure, the resistivity anomaly shifts to higher temperature. The results show that HfTe3 is a promising new material to help study the relationship between SC and CDW.Entities:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28338062 PMCID: PMC5364548 DOI: 10.1038/srep45217
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1(a) Rietveld analysis of the PXRD results for HfTe3. (b) Crystal structure of HfTe3 revealing the anisotropic growth preferential along the b-axis. (c) Projection down the b-axis showing more clearly the separation of the chains, where the chains are weakly bonded by the Van der Waals forces. The positions of the three non-equivalent Te atoms are defined as Te(1), Te(2) and Te(3) and bond distances are indicated by b1-b7. The unit cell is indicated by the black lines.
Crystallographic data for HfTe3.
| Monoclinic | 7500, | ||
| P21/m (No. 11) | 31 | ||
| 5.8797 (9) | 0.0847 | ||
| 3.8999 (9) | 0.066 | ||
| 10.0627 (3) | 1.544 | ||
| 98.38 (8) | 295 K | ||
| 228.28 (2) | |||
| 2 | |||
| 0.2590 (7) | 0.7339 (7) | ||
| 0.6881 (2) | 0.5674 (3) | ||
| 0.484 | 0.484 | ||
| 1 | 1 | ||
| 0.4173 (7) | 0.9058 (6) | ||
| 0.1625 (9) | 0.1638 (3) | ||
| 0.484 | 0.484 | ||
| 1 | 1 | ||
| 3.074 (6) | 2.870 (13) | ||
| 3.106 (8) | 3.010 (13) | ||
| 3.106 (6) | |||
| 3.062 (7) | |||
| 2.843 (6) | |||
*Isotropic displacement factors were constrained during refinement. †Refer to Fig. 1(c).
Figure 2(a) Temperature dependence of the resistivity for HfTe3. Data show a hump-like feature at ~80 K together with and SC-like transition at 1.8 K. Inset shows that the resistivity anomaly occurs at approximately 82 K (sample #A). (b) Current dependency of the resistivity of HfTe3 below 3 K. Tconset is approximately 1.8 K and Tczero is reached c.a. 1.4 K for a current of 0.05 mA. By an increase in current, both the Tconset and Tczero show a shift to lower temperatures (sample #B).
Figure 3(a) Pressure dependence of resistivity at the range of P = 0–1 GPa. (b) dρ/dT in the range of 30–150 K as a function of pressure. The minimum of the dip structure shows a shift to higher T with increasing P. Color coding between (a and b) are matched to indicate the same pressure values (sample #D).