Literature DB >> 28337385

Comparison of ticagrelor and high-dose clopidogrel on the platelet functions in patients with inadequate response to clopidogrel.

Xinshun Gu1, Xianghua Fu1, Yanbo Wang1, Wenhui Zhang1, Weize Fan1, Yunfa Jiang1, Guozhen Hao1, Qing Miao1, Yi Li1, Wei Zhi1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of ticagrelor and high-dose clopidogrel on the platelet functions in patients with inadequate response to clopidogrel.
METHODS: In this prospective, randomized and controlled study, patients who had been diagnosed as acute coronary syndrome (ACS) with inadequate response to clopidogrel in the Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University from July 2015 to June 2016 were enrolled. Inadequate response to clopidogrel was defined as absolute reduction of platelet aggregation rate (PAR) <30% or PAR >70%. Eligible patients were randomly assigned to two groups, the high-dose group and the ticagrelor group. Clinical information and intervention protocols were compared. The PAR of the two groups were measured at the time of baseline, the 24th hour, 72nd hour, and the 7th day after treatments, the other platelet-related parameters were measured including platelet count (PLT), mean platelet volume (MPV), platelet distribution width (PDW) at the same time points. Besides, the markers of platelet activation human P-selectin (CD62P) and thromboxane A2 (TXA2) were also recorded to compare. The incidence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) and the side effects between two groups were followed up for three months.
RESULTS: A total of 74 patients were finally enrolled, 38 of whom were assigned to the ticagrelor group and the rest of them to the high-dose clopidogrel group. The baseline clinical and procedural characterists were similar. There were no significant differences in baseline levels of PAR between the two groups [(79.38±11.20)% vs. (73.97±12.74)%, P>0.05]. For both groups, the levels of PAR significantly decreased at each time point (P<0.001). Besides, the levels of PAR in ticagrelor group were lower than those in high-dose clopidogrel group at the 24th hour, 72nd hour and 7th day after treatments: [(25.92±10.31)% vs. (37.95±11.63)%, P<0.001], [(28.02±14.61)% vs. (30.64±10.73)%, P<0.001], [(37.17±11.11)% vs. (36.80±7.26)%, P<0.001]. The baseline levels of platelet related parameters were similar between the two groups (P>0.05), and there were no significant differences in the levels of PLT, PDW, and MPV at the 24th hour, 72nd hour and 7th day. It was lower in ticagrelor group than that in clopidogrel group at the 24th hour [(5.47±1.03) ng/ml vs. (8.02±1.45) ng/ml, P<0.001] while the CD62P concentrations in the two groups significantly decreased comparing to the baseline levels (P<0.001). During 3-month follow-up, the incidences of MACE and side effects were not significantly different between the two group.
CONCLUSIONS: ticagrelor could further decrease levels of platelet aggression rate and CD62p compared with high-dose clopidogrel, without serious side effects.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ticagrelor; acute coronary syndrome; clopidogrel resistance; human P-selectin; thromboxane A2

Year:  2017        PMID: 28337385      PMCID: PMC5344966     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiovasc Dis        ISSN: 2160-200X


  23 in total

Review 1.  P2Y(12) inhibitors: differences in properties and mechanisms of action and potential consequences for clinical use.

Authors:  Lars Wallentin
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2009-07-24       Impact factor: 29.983

Review 2.  2009 focused updates: ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (updating the 2004 guideline and 2007 focused update) and ACC/AHA/SCAI guidelines on percutaneous coronary intervention (updating the 2005 guideline and 2007 focused update) a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines.

Authors:  Frederick G Kushner; Mary Hand; Sidney C Smith; Spencer B King; Jeffrey L Anderson; Elliott M Antman; Steven R Bailey; Eric R Bates; James C Blankenship; Donald E Casey; Lee A Green; Judith S Hochman; Alice K Jacobs; Harlan M Krumholz; Douglass A Morrison; Joseph P Ornato; David L Pearle; Eric D Peterson; Michael A Sloan; Patrick L Whitlow; David O Williams
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2009-12-01       Impact factor: 24.094

3.  ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation: The Task Force for the management of acute coronary syndromes (ACS) in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC).

Authors:  Christian W Hamm; Jean-Pierre Bassand; Stefan Agewall; Jeroen Bax; Eric Boersma; Hector Bueno; Pio Caso; Dariusz Dudek; Stephan Gielen; Kurt Huber; Magnus Ohman; Mark C Petrie; Frank Sonntag; Miguel Sousa Uva; Robert F Storey; William Wijns; Doron Zahger
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2011-08-26       Impact factor: 29.983

4.  Influence of platelet size on outcome after myocardial infarction.

Authors:  J F Martin; P M Bath; M L Burr
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1991-12-07       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Early and sustained dual oral antiplatelet therapy following percutaneous coronary intervention: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Steven R Steinhubl; Peter B Berger; J Tift Mann; Edward T A Fry; Augustin DeLago; Charles Wilmer; Eric J Topol
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2002-11-20       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Platelet reactivity and cardiovascular outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention: a time-dependent analysis of the Gauging Responsiveness with a VerifyNow P2Y12 assay: Impact on Thrombosis and Safety (GRAVITAS) trial.

Authors:  Matthew J Price; Dominick J Angiolillo; Paul S Teirstein; Elizabeth Lillie; Steven V Manoukian; Peter B Berger; Jean-François Tanguay; Christopher P Cannon; Eric J Topol
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2011-08-29       Impact factor: 29.690

7.  Effects of clopidogrel in addition to aspirin in patients with acute coronary syndromes without ST-segment elevation.

Authors:  S Yusuf; F Zhao; S R Mehta; S Chrolavicius; G Tognoni; K K Fox
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2001-08-16       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Randomized comparison of a high clopidogrel maintenance dose in patients with diabetes mellitus and coronary artery disease: results of the Optimizing Antiplatelet Therapy in Diabetes Mellitus (OPTIMUS) study.

Authors:  Dominick J Angiolillo; Steven B Shoemaker; Bhaloo Desai; Hang Yuan; Ronald K Charlton; Esther Bernardo; Martin M Zenni; Luis A Guzman; Theodore A Bass; Marco A Costa
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2007-01-29       Impact factor: 29.690

9.  A randomized trial of prasugrel versus clopidogrel in patients with high platelet reactivity on clopidogrel after elective percutaneous coronary intervention with implantation of drug-eluting stents: results of the TRIGGER-PCI (Testing Platelet Reactivity In Patients Undergoing Elective Stent Placement on Clopidogrel to Guide Alternative Therapy With Prasugrel) study.

Authors:  Dietmar Trenk; Gregg W Stone; Meinrad Gawaz; Adnan Kastrati; Dominick J Angiolillo; Ulrike Müller; Gert Richardt; Joseph A Jakubowski; Franz-Josef Neumann
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2012-04-18       Impact factor: 24.094

10.  Platelet reactivity after clopidogrel treatment assessed with point-of-care analysis and early drug-eluting stent thrombosis.

Authors:  Dirk Sibbing; Siegmund Braun; Tanja Morath; Julinda Mehilli; Wolfgang Vogt; Albert Schömig; Adnan Kastrati; Nicolas von Beckerath
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2009-03-10       Impact factor: 24.094

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.