OBJECTIVES: The primary aim was to compare attainment of goal serum amikacin concentrations using two dosage regimens in patients admitted to a neonatal intensive care unit. Secondary objectives included comparison of percentages of supratherapeutic trough concentrations, and subtherapeutic and supratherapeutic peak concentrations. METHODS: This was an Institutional Review Board-approved, retrospective study of neonates receiving amikacin during January-December 2013 (group 1) and January-December 2014 (group 2). Group 1 received amikacin dosage consistent with published recommendations, whereas group 2 was dosed using a modified protocol that was based on postmenstrual and postnatal age. Goal serum amikacin peak concentration was defined as 20 to 35 mg/L; hence, subtherapeutic and supratherapeutic peak concentrations were defined as <20 mg/L and >35 mg/L, respectively. Supratherapeutic trough concentrations were >8 mg/L. Between-group analysis was performed using Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test, Student t-test or χ2, or Fisher exact analysis as appropriate with a p value <0.05. RESULTS: A total of 278 neonates were included (group 1: n = 144; group 2: n = 134). Most patients were male (60%) and were admitted for prematurity or respiratory distress (77%). The median gestational age in group 1 was 34.4 weeks (range, 30.0-37.9 weeks) versus group 2 at 36.9 weeks (range, 31.4-38.9 weeks), whereas the postnatal age was similar between both groups at 4 days. There was a significant increase in attaining goal peak amikacin concentrations between groups 1 and 2, 34% versus 84%, p < 0.001, and decrease in supratherapeutic peak concentrations, 65% versus 12%, p < 0.001. There was no significant difference in subtherapeutic peak or supratherapeutic trough concentrations. CONCLUSIONS: A modified neonatal amikacin dosage protocol resulted in increased peak amikacin serum concentration compared with published dosage recommendations. Future research should focus on determination of the optimal dosage regimen in neonates.
OBJECTIVES: The primary aim was to compare attainment of goal serum amikacin concentrations using two dosage regimens in patients admitted to a neonatal intensive care unit. Secondary objectives included comparison of percentages of supratherapeutic trough concentrations, and subtherapeutic and supratherapeutic peak concentrations. METHODS: This was an Institutional Review Board-approved, retrospective study of neonates receiving amikacin during January-December 2013 (group 1) and January-December 2014 (group 2). Group 1 received amikacin dosage consistent with published recommendations, whereas group 2 was dosed using a modified protocol that was based on postmenstrual and postnatal age. Goal serum amikacin peak concentration was defined as 20 to 35 mg/L; hence, subtherapeutic and supratherapeutic peak concentrations were defined as <20 mg/L and >35 mg/L, respectively. Supratherapeutic trough concentrations were >8 mg/L. Between-group analysis was performed using Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test, Student t-test or χ2, or Fisher exact analysis as appropriate with a p value <0.05. RESULTS: A total of 278 neonates were included (group 1: n = 144; group 2: n = 134). Most patients were male (60%) and were admitted for prematurity or respiratory distress (77%). The median gestational age in group 1 was 34.4 weeks (range, 30.0-37.9 weeks) versus group 2 at 36.9 weeks (range, 31.4-38.9 weeks), whereas the postnatal age was similar between both groups at 4 days. There was a significant increase in attaining goal peak amikacin concentrations between groups 1 and 2, 34% versus 84%, p < 0.001, and decrease in supratherapeutic peak concentrations, 65% versus 12%, p < 0.001. There was no significant difference in subtherapeutic peak or supratherapeutic trough concentrations. CONCLUSIONS: A modified neonatal amikacin dosage protocol resulted in increased peak amikacin serum concentration compared with published dosage recommendations. Future research should focus on determination of the optimal dosage regimen in neonates.
Authors: Barbara J Stoll; Nellie I Hansen; Pablo J Sánchez; Roger G Faix; Brenda B Poindexter; Krisa P Van Meurs; Matthew J Bizzarro; Ronald N Goldberg; Ivan D Frantz; Ellen C Hale; Seetha Shankaran; Kathleen Kennedy; Waldemar A Carlo; Kristi L Watterberg; Edward F Bell; Michele C Walsh; Kurt Schibler; Abbot R Laptook; Andi L Shane; Stephanie J Schrag; Abhik Das; Rosemary D Higgins Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2011-04-25 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Amy L Nguyen; Peter N Johnson; Stephen B Neely; Kaitlin M Hughes; Kris C Sekar; Robert C Welliver; Jamie L Miller Journal: J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther Date: 2021-05-19
Authors: Christopher A Darlow; Fernando Docobo-Perez; Nicola Farrington; Adam Johnson; Laura McEntee; Jennifer Unsworth; Ana Jimenez-Valverde; Silke Gastine; Ruwanthi Kolamunnage-Dona; Renata M A de Costa; Sally Ellis; François Franceschi; Joseph F Standing; Mike Sharland; Michael Neely; Laura Piddock; Shampa Das; William Hope Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2021-06-17 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Christopher A Darlow; Renata M A da Costa; Sally Ellis; François Franceschi; Mike Sharland; Laura Piddock; Shampa Das; William Hope Journal: Paediatr Drugs Date: 2021-08-26 Impact factor: 3.022