| Literature DB >> 28336935 |
Andrew Barber1, Jay Brandes2, Alessandra Leri3, Karine Lalonde1, Kathryn Balind1, Sue Wirick4, Jian Wang5, Yves Gélinas6.
Abstract
Interactions between organic matter and mineral matrices are critical to the preservation of soil and sedimentEntities:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28336935 PMCID: PMC5428421 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-00494-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Composition of the samples and raw sediment Fe K-edge Linear combination fitting results.
| Sediment | Depth (cm) | Total OC content (wt%) | C/N(a) | δ13C (‰) | Sediment total Fe content (mg Fe/g sed) | Free iron oxide contribution to total sediment Fe (wt%) | Iron-OM complex contribution to total sediment Fe (wt%) | Residual non-reactive Fe contribution to total sediment Fe (wt%) | Sum of all fitting components (%) | OC bound to Fe(b) (% of total OC) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Saanich Inlet | 0–20 | 2.21 | 7.51 | −22.4 | 23.1 | 10.8 ± 2.2(c) | 18.1 ± 2.6 | 72.0 ± 4.9 | 101 | 28.09 |
| Arabian Sea | 0–0.5 | 1.11 | 8.04 | −21.6 | 17.3 | 26.5 ± 7.1 | 16.6 ± 6.3 | 57.4 ± 1.6 | 101 | 26.89 |
| Madeira Abyssal Plain turbidite | 119–121 | 0.29 | 15.04 | −21.9 | 39.8 | 68.6 ± 5.7 | 12.5 ± 6.1 | 11.7 ± 1.6 | 93 | NA |
| Black Sea | 0–0.5 | 4.61 | 15.69 | −26.6 | 33.3 | 0.0 ± 3.7 | 8.1 ± 1.0 | 90.4 ± 3.4 | 99 | 24.98 |
| Mexican Margin (Station 306) | 0–0.5 | 6.66 | 9.27 | −22.1 | 30.7 | 15.1 ± 1.9 | 7.8 ± 0.7 | 74.6 ± 2.3 | 98 | 22.31 |
| Mexican Margin (Station 305) | 0–0.5 | 2.82 | 9.00 | −21.5 | 35.4 | 19.4 ± 5.0 | 6.7 ± 0.6 | 76.0 ± 2.2 | 102 | 12.70 |
| Southern Ocean | 8–12 | 0.33 | 8.27 | −20.8 | 7.7 | 14.8 ± 4.9 | 5.3 ± 0.9 | 82.2 ± 3.9 | 102 | 29.00 |
| St. Lawrence Estuary | 0–35 | 1.43 | 12.83 | −24.3 | 32.6 | 12.8 ± 0.4 | 5.1 ± 1.3 | 80.6 ± 1.6 | 99 | 25.13 |
| Equatorial Pacific 0°N | 0–0.5 | 0.27 | 8.26 | −21.6 | 3.2 | 40.4 ± 5.1 | —(d) | 61.1 ± 1.1 | 102 | 34.79 |
| Arctic Margin | 0–1 | 1.18 | 7.35 | −26.2 | 50.9 | 41.1 ± 3.5 | — | 56.9 ± 1.3 | 98 | 7.60 |
| Equatorial Pacific 9°N | 10–12 | 0.30 | 4.58 | −22.4 | 35.7 | 13.9 ± 2.0 | — | 87.6 ± 4.6 | 102 | 12.16 |
(a)Atomic C/N ratio.
(b)Percent of total sediment OC associated to reducible iron oxides taken from ref. 7.
(c)1σ errors for the fitting results.
(d)Component not used in the combinatorial linear fitting calculations.
Figure 1Iron K-edge XANES Linear Combination Fitting of the raw sediment Fe spectra for the Mexican 306 sediment using three end-members: goethite/lepidocrocite, ferric oxalate and the reactive iron extracted sediment residue. The best fit (red trace) is almost superimposed on the spectra for the raw, untreated sediment (blue trace).
Figure 2STXM “Scan Maps” collected between (a) 280 and 288.6 eV for carbon, and (b) between 700 and 710 eV for iron, respectively. These maps allowed selecting areas where OC and Fe were co-localized in our samples for NEXAFS collection.
Figure 3Iron K-edge spectra for the samples analyzed in this study. (a) First derivative of Fe 1s XANES spectra for goethite, ferric oxalate and synthetic lepidocrocite with initial solution OC:Fe Molar ratios of 1, 3, and 10. The intersecting line at 7124.5 eV highlights the shift in absorbance maxima for ferric oxalate; (b) Normalized Fe 1s XANES spectra for raw sediments with the vertical line at 7132.8 eV representing the absorption maximum for goethite/lepidocrocite.
Figure 4Iron K-edge XANES linear combination fitting results showing the OC-free iron oxides (blue), OC-complexed reactive iron (brown), and residual sediment iron (green) contributions to the total sediment Fe pool.
Figure 5Chemical composition of co-localized iron (panels a and b–d) and organic matter (panels a and e–h). (a) Representative 12 × 8 μm X-ray microscopy image from the Mexican Margin sediment (Station 306); (b) Iron L3 edge XAS spectra for the Fe cluster maps in panels (c–e) Carbon K-edge XAS spectra for the (c) cluster maps in panels (f–h). Note that colored traces in panels (b and e) correspond to the different coloured carbon clusters in panels (c,d and f–h), respectively. Each cluster was identified using the PCA and clustering analysis described in the methods section.
Figure 6Correlation between the quantity of OC associated to iron oxides measured by wet chemical extraction[7], and the quantity of Fe found complexed to OC measured by XANES (this work) for the samples studied in this work. Sediments accumulating under anoxic conditions are excluded from the regression (see text for explanations).