| Literature DB >> 28336844 |
Milton Cordeiro1,2, Lara Carvalho3, Joana Silva4, Leonor Saúde5, Alexandra R Fernandes6, Pedro V Baptista7.
Abstract
The use of gold nanoparticles for effective gene silencing has demonstrated its potential as a tool for gene expression experiments and for the treatment of several diseases. Here, we used a gold nanobeacon designed to specifically silence the enhanced green fluorescence protein (EGFP) mRNA in embryos of a fli-EGFP transgenic zebrafish line, while simultaneously allowing the tracking and localization of the silencing events via the beacon's emission. Fluorescence imaging measurements demonstrated a decrease of the EGFP emission with a concomitant increase in the fluorescence of the Au-nanobeacon. Furthermore, microinjection of the Au-nanobeacon led to a negligible difference in mortality and malformations in comparison to the free oligonucleotide, indicating that this system is a biocompatible platform for the administration of gene silencing moieties. Together, these data illustrate the potential of Au-nanobeacons as tools for in vivo zebrafish gene modulation with low toxicity which may be used towards any gene of interest.Entities:
Keywords: fli-EGFP; gene silencing; gold nanobeacons; gold nanoparticles; zebrafish
Year: 2017 PMID: 28336844 PMCID: PMC5295200 DOI: 10.3390/nano7010010
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nanomaterials (Basel) ISSN: 2079-4991 Impact factor: 5.076
Figure 1Characterization of the synthesized AuNP@citrate and Au-nanobeacon; (a) Size distribution of the synthesized AuNP@citrate, Inset: Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) image of the AuNP@citrate (scale bar: 100 nm); (b) Ultra-violet (UV)-Vis spectra of the AuNP@citrate (solid black line) and Au-nanobeacon (solid grey line); (c) Hydrodynamic diameter of AuNP@citrate and Au-nanobeacon; (d) Calibration curve for the quantification of the number of hairpins per PEGylated AuNPs; (e) Zeta potential of AuNP@citrate and Au-nanobeacon.
Figure 2Au-nanobeacon silencing efficiency of the enhanced green fluorescence protein (EGFP) and acute toxicity assessment. Fluorescence imaging of whole embryos after injection (amplification 8.1×); (a) Green channel of control embryos; (b) Red channel of control embryos; (c) Merged channels for control embryos; (d) Green channel of injected embryos; (e) Red channel of injected embryos; (f) Merged channels for injected embryos (8.1× amplification); (g) Quantification of fluorescence in whole embryos using Image J. The results were normalized to the respective channel of the control. The data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation of five embryos (sample t test—*** for p < 0.05); (h) Zoom of 32.4× of the injected embryos’ merged channels (400% of 8.1×); (i) Quantification of death, survival and morphological malformations upon microinjection of AuNP@citrate, AuNP@PEG, Oligo anti-EGFP and Au-nanobeacon; Error bars corresponds to standard deviation of at least 50 embryos; (j) Example of embryos observed after microinjection of AuNP@citrate, AuNP@PEG, Oligo anti-EGFP and Au-nanobeacon: (j1) Normal embryo; (j2) Head and tail malformation; (j3) Pericardial edema; (j4) Underdeveloped embryo.