Marvin A H Berrevoets1, Ilse J E Kouijzer2, Erik H J G Aarntzen3, Marcel J R Janssen3, Lioe-Fee De Geus-Oei4,5, Heiman F L Wertheim6, Bart-Jan Kullberg2, Jaap Ten Oever2, Wim J G Oyen3,7, Chantal P Bleeker-Rovers2. 1. Department of Internal Medicine and Radboud Center for Infectious Diseases, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands Marvin.Berrevoets@radboudumc.nl. 2. Department of Internal Medicine and Radboud Center for Infectious Diseases, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. 3. Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. 4. Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands. 5. MIRA Institute for Biomedical Technology and Technical Medicine, Biomedical Photonic Imaging Group, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands. 6. Department of Medical Microbiology and Radboud Center for Infectious Diseases, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands; and. 7. Institute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Abstract
Metastatic infection is an important complication of Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia (SAB). Early diagnosis of metastatic infection is crucial, because specific treatment is required. However, metastatic infection can be asymptomatic and difficult to detect. In this study, we investigated the role of 18F-FDG PET/CT in patients with SAB for detection of metastatic infection and its consequences for treatment and outcome. Methods: All patients with SAB at Radboud University Medical Center were included between January 2013 and April 2016. Clinical data and results of 18F-FDG PET/CT and other imaging techniques, including echocardiography, were collected. Primary outcomes were newly diagnosed metastatic infection by 18F-FDG PET/CT, subsequent treatment modifications, and patient outcome. Results: A total of 184 patients were included, and 18F-FDG PET/CT was performed in 105 patients, of whom 99 had a high-risk bacteremia. 18F-FDG PET/CT detected metastatic infectious foci in 73.7% of these high-risk patients. In 71.2% of patients with metastatic infection, no signs and symptoms suggesting metastatic complications were present before 18F-FDG PET/CT was performed. 18F-FDG PET/CT led to a total of 104 treatment modifications in 74 patients. Three-month mortality was higher in high-risk bacteremia patients without 18F-FDG PET/CT performed than in those in whom 18F-FDG PET/CT was performed (32.7% vs. 12.4%, P = 0.003). In multivariate analysis, 18F-FDG PET/CT was the only factor independently associated with reduced mortality (P = 0.005; odds ratio, 0.204; 95% confidence interval, 0.066-0.624). A higher comorbidity score was independently associated with increased mortality (P = 0.003; odds ratio, 1.254; 95% confidence interval, 1.078-1.457). Conclusion: 18F-FDG PET/CT is a valuable technique for early detection of metastatic infectious foci, often leading to treatment modification. Performing 18F-FDG PET/CT is associated with significantly reduced 3-mo mortality.
Metastatic infection is an important complication of Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia (SAB). Early diagnosis of metastatic infection is crucial, because specific treatment is required. However, metastatic infection can be asymptomatic and difficult to detect. In this study, we investigated the role of 18F-FDG PET/CT in patients with SAB for detection of metastatic infection and its consequences for treatment and outcome. Methods: All patients with SAB at Radboud University Medical Center were included between January 2013 and April 2016. Clinical data and results of 18F-FDG PET/CT and other imaging techniques, including echocardiography, were collected. Primary outcomes were newly diagnosed metastatic infection by 18F-FDG PET/CT, subsequent treatment modifications, and patient outcome. Results: A total of 184 patients were included, and 18F-FDG PET/CT was performed in 105 patients, of whom 99 had a high-risk bacteremia. 18F-FDG PET/CT detected metastatic infectious foci in 73.7% of these high-risk patients. In 71.2% of patients with metastatic infection, no signs and symptoms suggesting metastatic complications were present before 18F-FDG PET/CT was performed. 18F-FDG PET/CT led to a total of 104 treatment modifications in 74 patients. Three-month mortality was higher in high-risk bacteremiapatients without 18F-FDG PET/CT performed than in those in whom 18F-FDG PET/CT was performed (32.7% vs. 12.4%, P = 0.003). In multivariate analysis, 18F-FDG PET/CT was the only factor independently associated with reduced mortality (P = 0.005; odds ratio, 0.204; 95% confidence interval, 0.066-0.624). A higher comorbidity score was independently associated with increased mortality (P = 0.003; odds ratio, 1.254; 95% confidence interval, 1.078-1.457). Conclusion:18F-FDG PET/CT is a valuable technique for early detection of metastatic infectious foci, often leading to treatment modification. Performing 18F-FDG PET/CT is associated with significantly reduced 3-mo mortality.
Authors: Scott L Weiss; Mark J Peters; Waleed Alhazzani; Michael S D Agus; Heidi R Flori; David P Inwald; Simon Nadel; Luregn J Schlapbach; Robert C Tasker; Andrew C Argent; Joe Brierley; Joseph Carcillo; Enitan D Carrol; Christopher L Carroll; Ira M Cheifetz; Karen Choong; Jeffry J Cies; Andrea T Cruz; Daniele De Luca; Akash Deep; Saul N Faust; Claudio Flauzino De Oliveira; Mark W Hall; Paul Ishimine; Etienne Javouhey; Koen F M Joosten; Poonam Joshi; Oliver Karam; Martin C J Kneyber; Joris Lemson; Graeme MacLaren; Nilesh M Mehta; Morten Hylander Møller; Christopher J L Newth; Trung C Nguyen; Akira Nishisaki; Mark E Nunnally; Margaret M Parker; Raina M Paul; Adrienne G Randolph; Suchitra Ranjit; Lewis H Romer; Halden F Scott; Lyvonne N Tume; Judy T Verger; Eric A Williams; Joshua Wolf; Hector R Wong; Jerry J Zimmerman; Niranjan Kissoon; Pierre Tissieres Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2020-02 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Jaap Ten Oever; Joëll L Jansen; Thomas W van der Vaart; Jeroen A Schouten; Marlies E J L Hulscher; Annelies Verbon Journal: J Antimicrob Chemother Date: 2019-11-01 Impact factor: 5.790
Authors: Michelle Gompelman; Renée A M Tuinte; Marvin A H Berrevoets; Chantal P Bleeker-Rovers; Geert J A Wanten Journal: Nutrients Date: 2020-10-14 Impact factor: 5.717
Authors: Merel M C Lambregts; Eva B D Molendijk; Soufian Meziyerh; Emile F Schippers; Nathalie M Delfos; Masja Leendertse; Alexandra T Bernards; Leo G Visser; Olaf M Dekkers; Mark G J de Boer Journal: Int J Clin Pract Date: 2020-07-14 Impact factor: 3.149
Authors: D T P Buis; E Sieswerda; I J E Kouijzer; W Y Huynh; G L Burchell; M A H Berrevoets; J M Prins; K C E Sigaloff Journal: BMC Infect Dis Date: 2022-03-24 Impact factor: 3.090