Literature DB >> 28336249

Current Epidemiology of Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty in the United States: National Inpatient Sample 2009 to 2013.

Chukwuweike U Gwam1, Jaydev B Mistry1, Nequesha S Mohamed1, Melbin Thomas1, Kevin C Bigart2, Michael A Mont2, Ronald E Delanois1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Despite the excellent outcomes associated with primary total hip arthroplasty (THA), implant failure and revision continues to burden the healthcare system. THA failure has evolved and displays variability throughout the literature. In order to understand how THAs are failing and how to reduce this burden, it is essential to assess modes of implant failure on a large scale. Thus, we report: (1) etiologies for revision THA; (2) frequencies of revision THA procedures; (3) patient demographics, payor type, and US Census region of revision THA patients; and (4) the length of stay and total costs based on the type of revision THA procedure.
METHODS: We queried the National Inpatient Sample database for all revision THA procedures performed between January 1, 2009 and December 31, 2013. This yielded 258,461 revision THAs. Patients specific demographics were identified in order to determine the prevalence of revision procedure performed.
RESULTS: Dislocation was the main indication for revision THA (17.3%), followed by mechanical loosening (16.8%). All-component revision was the most common procedure performed (41.8%). Patients were most commonly white (77.4%), aged 75 years and older (31.6%), and resided in the South US Census region (37.0%). The average length of stay for all procedures was 5.29 days. The mean total charge for revision THA procedures was $77,851.24.
CONCLUSION: Dislocation and mechanical loosening is the predominant indication for revision THA in the United States. With the frequency of revision THAs projected to double in the next decade, orthopedists must take steps to mitigate this potentially devastating complication.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  National Inpatient Sample; arthroplasty failure; epidemiology; revision; total hip arthroplasty

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28336249     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.02.046

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  80 in total

1.  Cementless versus Cemented Fixation in Total Knee Arthroplasty: Usage, Costs, and Complications during the Inpatient Period.

Authors:  Chukwuweike U Gwam; Nicole E George; Jennifer I Etcheson; Samuel Rosas; Johannes F Plate; Ronald E Delanois
Journal:  J Knee Surg       Date:  2018-11-05       Impact factor: 2.757

2.  CORR Insights®: What is the Diagnostic Accuracy of MRI for Component Loosening in THA?

Authors:  H John Cooper
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 3.  Low-Virulence Organisms and Periprosthetic Joint Infection-Biofilm Considerations of These Organisms.

Authors:  K Keely Boyle; Stuart Wood; T David Tarity
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2018-09

4.  CORR Insights®: Do Well-functioning THAs Retrieved at Autopsy Exhibit Evidence of Fretting and Corrosion?

Authors:  Ronald Emilio Delanois
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Impaired Autophagy in the Fibroblasts by Titanium Particles Increased the Release of CX3CL1 and Promoted the Chemotactic Migration of Monocytes.

Authors:  Wen Wu; Lei Wang; Yuan-Qing Mao; Ke-Rong Dai; Yong-Qiang Hao
Journal:  Inflammation       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 4.092

6.  CT metal artifacts in patients with total hip replacements: for artifact reduction monoenergetic reconstructions and post-processing algorithms are both efficient but not similar.

Authors:  Kai Roman Laukamp; Simon Lennartz; Victor-Frederic Neuhaus; Nils Große Hokamp; Robert Rau; Markus Le Blanc; Nuran Abdullayev; Anastasios Mpotsaris; David Maintz; Jan Borggrefe
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-05-03       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Management of femoral bone loss in revision total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Saradej Khuangsirikul; Thanainit Chotanaphuti
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2019-12-14

8.  What Is the Association Between Hospital Volume and Complications After Revision Total Joint Arthroplasty: A Large-database Study.

Authors:  Benjamin F Ricciardi; Andrew Y Liu; Bowen Qiu; Thomas G Myers; Caroline P Thirukumaran
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Discharge to the skilled nursing facility: patient risk factors and perioperative outcomes after total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Prem N Ramkumar; Chukwuweike Gwam; Sergio M Navarro; Heather S Haeberle; Jaret M Karnuta; Ronald E Delanois; Michael A Mont
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2019-02

10.  Perioperative factors associated with increased length of stay after revision of metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jonathan H Garfinkel; Brian P Gladnick; Cole S Pachter; Niall H Cochrane; David W Romness
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2019-01-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.