Caroline S E Homer1, Sabera Turkmani2, Michele Rumsey3. 1. Centre for Midwifery, Child and Family Health, WHO Collaborating Centre for Nursing, Midwifery and Health Development, Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Australia. Electronic address: Caroline.Homer@uts.edu.au. 2. Centre for Midwifery, Child and Family Health, Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Australia. Electronic address: Sabera.Turkmani@uts.edu.au. 3. WHO Collaborating Centre for Nursing, Midwifery and Health Development, Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Australia. Electronic address: Michele.Rumsey@uts.edu.au.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Strengthening midwifery is a global priority. Recently, global evidence has provided momentum toward developing the midwifery workforce. In 2014, the State of the World's Midwifery 2014 Report explored midwifery services in 73 low to middle income countries. In the South Pacific region, only Papua New Guinea and the Solomon Islands were included. This means that there is little known on the state of midwifery in the small island countries in the South Pacific. AIM: To explore the current situation of the education, regulation and association of midwives in 12 small island nations of the South Pacific and determine the gaps in these areas. METHODS: A descriptive study was undertaken. Data were collected through a survey completed by key representatives (usually the Chief Nursing and Midwifery Officer) from each of the 12 countries. Ethical approval was received from the relevant Human Research Ethics Committee. FINDINGS: Many of the countries had few midwives, in some instances, only two midwives for the whole country. Midwifery education programs included post-graduate diploma, certificates and bachelor degrees. Midwives were required to be registered nurses in all countries. Regulation and licensing also varied - most countries did not have a separate licensing system for midwives. Only three countries have a specific professional association for midwives. CONCLUSION: The variation and the small number of midwives poses challenges for workforce planning. Consideration could be given to developing regional standards and potentially a shared curriculum framework. Ongoing collaboration and networking between countries is a critical part of future developments.
BACKGROUND: Strengthening midwifery is a global priority. Recently, global evidence has provided momentum toward developing the midwifery workforce. In 2014, the State of the World's Midwifery 2014 Report explored midwifery services in 73 low to middle income countries. In the South Pacific region, only Papua New Guinea and the Solomon Islands were included. This means that there is little known on the state of midwifery in the small island countries in the South Pacific. AIM: To explore the current situation of the education, regulation and association of midwives in 12 small island nations of the South Pacific and determine the gaps in these areas. METHODS: A descriptive study was undertaken. Data were collected through a survey completed by key representatives (usually the Chief Nursing and Midwifery Officer) from each of the 12 countries. Ethical approval was received from the relevant Human Research Ethics Committee. FINDINGS: Many of the countries had few midwives, in some instances, only two midwives for the whole country. Midwifery education programs included post-graduate diploma, certificates and bachelor degrees. Midwives were required to be registered nurses in all countries. Regulation and licensing also varied - most countries did not have a separate licensing system for midwives. Only three countries have a specific professional association for midwives. CONCLUSION: The variation and the small number of midwives poses challenges for workforce planning. Consideration could be given to developing regional standards and potentially a shared curriculum framework. Ongoing collaboration and networking between countries is a critical part of future developments.
Authors: Alyce N Wilson; Pele Melepia; Rose Suruka; Priscah Hezeri; Dukduk Kabiu; Delly Babona; Pinip Wapi; Naomi Spotswood; Meghan A Bohren; Joshua P Vogel; Angela Kelly-Hanku; Alison Morgan; James G Beeson; Christopher Morgan; Lisa M Vallely; Edward J Waramin; Michelle J L Scoullar; Caroline S E Homer Journal: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Date: 2022-06-01 Impact factor: 3.105
Authors: Michele Rumsey; Margaret Leong; Di Brown; Michael Larui; Moralene Capelle; Nathalia Rodrigues Journal: Lancet Reg Health West Pac Date: 2021-12-22