| Literature DB >> 28335307 |
Elena Zanni1,2, Chandrakanth Reddy Chandraiahgari3,4, Giovanni De Bellis5,6, Maria Rita Montereali7, Giovanna Armiento8, Paolo Ballirano9, Antonella Polimeni10, Maria Sabrina Sarto11,12, Daniela Uccelletti13,14.
Abstract
Nanomaterials are revolutionizing the field of medicine to improve the quality of life due to the myriad of applications stemming from their unique properties, including the antimicrobial activity against pathogens. In this study, the antimicrobial and antibiofilm properties of a novel nanomaterial composed by zinc oxide nanorods-decorated graphene nanoplatelets (ZNGs) are investigated. ZNGs were produced by hydrothermal method and characterized through field-emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM), energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) and X-ray diffraction (XRD) techniques. The antimicrobial activity of ZNGs was evaluated against Streptococcus mutans, the main bacteriological agent in the etiology of dental caries. Cell viability assay demonstrated that ZNGs exerted a strikingly high killing effect on S. mutans cells in a dose-dependent manner. Moreover, FE-SEM analysis revealed relevant mechanical damages exerted by ZNGs at the cell surface of this dental pathogen rather than reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation. In addition, inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) measurements showed negligible zinc dissolution, demonstrating that zinc ion release in the suspension is not associated with the high cell mortality rate. Finally, our data indicated that also S. mutans biofilm formation was affected by the presence of graphene-zinc oxide (ZnO) based material, as witnessed by the safranin staining and growth curve analysis. Therefore, ZNGs can be a remarkable nanobactericide against one of the main dental pathogens. The potential applications in dental care and therapy are very promising.Entities:
Keywords: antimicrobial activity; composite; dental caries; graphene nanoplatelets; streptococcus mutans; zinc oxide
Year: 2016 PMID: 28335307 PMCID: PMC5245199 DOI: 10.3390/nano6100179
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nanomaterials (Basel) ISSN: 2079-4991 Impact factor: 5.076
Figure 1Field emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM) images of (A) pristine graphene nanoplatelets (GNPs), (B) pristine zinc oxide nanorods (ZnO-NRs), and (C,D) ZnO-NRs-decorated GNPs (ZNGs).
Figure 2Energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) elemental analysis performed on the (A) ZNGs and elemental mapping for (B) carbon, (C) zinc, (D) oxygen, and (E) corresponding EDX spectrum.
Figure 3X-ray diffraction patterns of all the produced nanostructures.
Figure 4Cell survival after treatment with GNPs, ZnO-NRs, and the combination of both materials. Statistical analysis was performed by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) method coupled with the Bonferroni post-test (ns not significant; *** p < 0.001 compared to the control).
Figure 5Photographs of GNPs and ZNGs aqueous suspensions prepared at various concentrations.
Figure 6Concentration-dependent antibacterial activity of ZnO-NRs-decorated GNPs (ZNG) against bacteria cells. Loss of cell viability rate was obtained by colony counting method. Error bars represent the standard deviation. Statistical analysis was performed by one-way ANOVA method coupled with the Bonferroni post-test (ns not significant; * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001 compared to the control).
Figure 7FE-SEM micrographs of S.mutans cells; (A) untreated and (B) treated with ZNGs suspension (50 µg/mL) for 24 h.
Figure 8Cytoplasmic reactive oxygen species (ROS) content was evaluated by measuring the dichlorofuorescein diacetate (H2DCFDA) probe activation through ROS generation in S. mutans cells treated or not with 5 µg/mL suspensions of ZNGs for 2 h. Data are expressed as fluorescence relative to untreated cells. Statistical analysis was performed by Student’s t-test (ns not significant).
Zn2+ concentration measured by ICP-MS in ZNG and ZnO-NRs suspensions incubated or not with S. mutans for 24 h.
| Nanostructure Type | Nanostructure Concentration (µg/mL) | Treated with | Zn2+ Concentration (μg/mL) |
|---|---|---|---|
| ZnO-NRs | 5 | no | 2.58 |
| ZNGs | 5 | no | 1.24 |
| ZnO-NRs | 5 | yes | 1.94 |
| ZNGs | 5 | yes | 0.61 |
Figure 9(A) Bacterial growth of S. mutans cells in media containing different concentrations of ZNGs is expressed as absorbance and OD600 was measured at the indicated time points; (B) Biofilm matrix was quantified by safranin binding assay. The production of EPS and biomass of S. mutans cells were evaluated after treatment with ZNGs and normalized to the untreated cells set as one. Statistical analysis was performed by Student’s t-test (*** p < 0.001 compared to the control).