| Literature DB >> 28335029 |
Llorenç Quintó1,2, Alberto L García-Basteiro1,3,4, Azucena Bardají1,2,3, Raquel González1,2,3, Norma Padilla5, Flor E Martinez-Espinosa6,7, Myriam Arévalo-Herrera8, Eusébio Macete3,9, Clara Menéndez1,2,3.
Abstract
The present article examines the impact of the current limitations of the microcephaly definition in the context of the Zika virus outbreak. It highlights its dependence on the method used for determining gestational age and other anthropometric parameters, and includes original results of prevalence of microcephaly in four countries from two different continents (Mozambique, Brazil, Guatemala and Colombia). Alternative definitions of microcephaly are proposed to allow the identification of true cases of microcephaly in a more accurate manner.Entities:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28335029 DOI: 10.1093/tropej/fmx015
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Trop Pediatr ISSN: 0142-6338 Impact factor: 1.165