Literature DB >> 28334916

Mocap: large-scale inference of transcription factor binding sites from chromatin accessibility.

Xi Chen1, Bowen Yu2, Nicholas Carriero3, Claudio Silva2, Richard Bonneau1,2,3.   

Abstract

Differential binding of transcription factors (TFs) at cis-regulatory loci drives the differentiation and function of diverse cellular lineages. Understanding the regulatory interactions that underlie cell fate decisions requires characterizing TF binding sites (TFBS) across multiple cell types and conditions. Techniques, e.g. ChIP-Seq can reveal genome-wide patterns of TF binding, but typically requires laborious and costly experiments for each TF-cell-type (TFCT) condition of interest. Chromosomal accessibility assays can connect accessible chromatin in one cell type to many TFs through sequence motif mapping. Such methods, however, rarely take into account that the genomic context preferred by each factor differs from TF to TF, and from cell type to cell type. To address the differences in TF behaviors, we developed Mocap, a method that integrates chromatin accessibility, motif scores, TF footprints, CpG/GC content, evolutionary conservation and other factors in an ensemble of TFCT-specific classifiers. We show that integration of genomic features, such as CpG islands improves TFBS prediction in some TFCT. Further, we describe a method for mapping new TFCT, for which no ChIP-seq data exists, onto our ensemble of classifiers and show that our cross-sample TFBS prediction method outperforms several previously described methods.
© The Author(s) 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Nucleic Acids Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28334916      PMCID: PMC5416775          DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkx174

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res        ISSN: 0305-1048            Impact factor:   16.971


  99 in total

Review 1.  Absence of a simple code: how transcription factors read the genome.

Authors:  Matthew Slattery; Tianyin Zhou; Lin Yang; Ana Carolina Dantas Machado; Raluca Gordân; Remo Rohs
Journal:  Trends Biochem Sci       Date:  2014-08-14       Impact factor: 13.807

Review 2.  Genomic approaches towards finding cis-regulatory modules in animals.

Authors:  Ross C Hardison; James Taylor
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2012-06-18       Impact factor: 53.242

3.  Low affinity binding site clusters confer hox specificity and regulatory robustness.

Authors:  Justin Crocker; Namiko Abe; Lucrezia Rinaldi; Alistair P McGregor; Nicolás Frankel; Shu Wang; Ahmad Alsawadi; Philippe Valenti; Serge Plaza; François Payre; Richard S Mann; David L Stern
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2014-12-31       Impact factor: 41.582

4.  G+C content dominates intrinsic nucleosome occupancy.

Authors:  Desiree Tillo; Timothy R Hughes
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-12-22       Impact factor: 3.169

5.  DNase footprint signatures are dictated by factor dynamics and DNA sequence.

Authors:  Myong-Hee Sung; Michael J Guertin; Songjoon Baek; Gordon L Hager
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2014-09-18       Impact factor: 17.970

6.  CpG methylation has differential effects on the binding of YY1 and ETS proteins to the bi-directional promoter of the Surf-1 and Surf-2 genes.

Authors:  K Gaston; M Fried
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1995-03-25       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 7.  Pioneer transcription factors: establishing competence for gene expression.

Authors:  Kenneth S Zaret; Jason S Carroll
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2011-11-01       Impact factor: 11.361

8.  Robust data-driven incorporation of prior knowledge into the inference of dynamic regulatory networks.

Authors:  Alex Greenfield; Christoph Hafemeister; Richard Bonneau
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2013-03-21       Impact factor: 6.937

9.  An experimentally supported model of the Bacillus subtilis global transcriptional regulatory network.

Authors:  Mario L Arrieta-Ortiz; Christoph Hafemeister; Ashley Rose Bate; Timothy Chu; Alex Greenfield; Bentley Shuster; Samantha N Barry; Matthew Gallitto; Brian Liu; Thadeous Kacmarczyk; Francis Santoriello; Jie Chen; Christopher D A Rodrigues; Tsutomu Sato; David Z Rudner; Adam Driks; Richard Bonneau; Patrick Eichenberger
Journal:  Mol Syst Biol       Date:  2015-11-17       Impact factor: 11.429

10.  Chromatin accessibility data sets show bias due to sequence specificity of the DNase I enzyme.

Authors:  Hashem Koohy; Thomas A Down; Tim J Hubbard
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-26       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  11 in total

Review 1.  Sequence and chromatin determinants of transcription factor binding and the establishment of cell type-specific binding patterns.

Authors:  Divyanshi Srivastava; Shaun Mahony
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta Gene Regul Mech       Date:  2019-10-19       Impact factor: 4.490

2.  NetTIME: a multitask and base-pair resolution framework for improved transcription factor binding site prediction.

Authors:  Ren Yi; Kyunghyun Cho; Richard Bonneau
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2022-10-14       Impact factor: 6.931

3.  Virtual ChIP-seq: predicting transcription factor binding by learning from the transcriptome.

Authors:  Mehran Karimzadeh; Michael M Hoffman
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2022-06-10       Impact factor: 17.906

4.  Integrated analysis of motif activity and gene expression changes of transcription factors.

Authors:  Jesper Grud Skat Madsen; Alexander Rauch; Elvira Laila Van Hauwaert; Søren Fisker Schmidt; Marc Winnefeld; Susanne Mandrup
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2017-12-12       Impact factor: 9.043

5.  MICMIC: identification of DNA methylation of distal regulatory regions with causal effects on tumorigenesis.

Authors:  Yin Tong; Jianlong Sun; Chi Fat Wong; Qingzheng Kang; Beibei Ru; Ching Ngar Wong; April Sheila Chan; Suet Yi Leung; Jiangwen Zhang
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2018-06-05       Impact factor: 13.583

6.  IMPACT: Genomic Annotation of Cell-State-Specific Regulatory Elements Inferred from the Epigenome of Bound Transcription Factors.

Authors:  Tiffany Amariuta; Yang Luo; Steven Gazal; Emma E Davenport; Bryce van de Geijn; Kazuyoshi Ishigaki; Harm-Jan Westra; Nikola Teslovich; Yukinori Okada; Kazuhiko Yamamoto; Alkes L Price; Soumya Raychaudhuri
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2019-04-18       Impact factor: 11.025

7.  Leveraging chromatin accessibility for transcriptional regulatory network inference in T Helper 17 Cells.

Authors:  Emily R Miraldi; Maria Pokrovskii; Aaron Watters; Dayanne M Castro; Nicholas De Veaux; Jason A Hall; June-Yong Lee; Maria Ciofani; Aviv Madar; Nick Carriero; Dan R Littman; Richard Bonneau
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2019-01-29       Impact factor: 9.043

8.  Evidence of widespread, independent sequence signature for transcription factor cobinding.

Authors:  Manqi Zhou; Hongyang Li; Xueqing Wang; Yuanfang Guan
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2020-12-10       Impact factor: 9.043

9.  An interpretable bimodal neural network characterizes the sequence and preexisting chromatin predictors of induced transcription factor binding.

Authors:  Divyanshi Srivastava; Begüm Aydin; Esteban O Mazzoni; Shaun Mahony
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2021-01-07       Impact factor: 13.583

10.  Automated generation of context-specific gene regulatory networks with a weighted approach in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Leandro Murgas; Sebastian Contreras-Riquelme; J Eduardo Martínez-Hernandez; Camilo Villaman; Rodrigo Santibáñez; Alberto J M Martin
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2021-06-11       Impact factor: 3.906

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.