Literature DB >> 28334687

Neurocognitive status in patients with newly-diagnosed brain tumors in good neurological condition: The impact of tumor type, volume, and location.

Philipp Hendrix1, Elisa Hans2, Christoph J Griessenauer3, Andreas Simgen4, Joachim Oertel2, Julia Karbach5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Neurocognitive function is of great importance in patients with brain tumors. Even patients in good neurological condition may suffer from neurocognitive dysfunction that affects their daily living. The purpose of the present study was to identify risk factors for neurocognitive dysfunction in patients suffering from common supratentorial brain tumors with minor neurological deficits.
METHODS: A prospective study evaluating neurocognitive dysfunction in patients with a newly-diagnosed brain tumor in good neurological condition was performed at a major German academic institution. Patients underwent extensive neurocognitive testing assessing perceptual speed, executive function, visual-spatial and verbal working memory, short- and long-term memory, verbal fluency, fluid intelligence, anxiety, and depression. For each patient, a healthy control was pair-matched based on age, sex, handedness, and profession.
RESULTS: A total of 46 patients and 46 healthy controls underwent neurocognitive testing. Patients suffered from glioblastoma multiforme (10), cerebral metastasis (10), pituitary adenoma (13), or meningioma (13). There was neither any difference in age, educational level, fluid intelligence, neurological deficits, and anxiety nor in any depression scores between tumor subgroups. Overall, neurocognitive performance was significantly worse in patients compared to healthy controls. Larger tumor volume, frontal location, and left/dominant hemisphere were associated with worse executive functioning and verbal fluency. Additionally, larger tumors and left/dominant location correlated with impairments on perceptual speed tasks. Frontal tumor location was related to worse performance in visual-spatial and short- and long-term memory. Tumor type, clinical presentation, and patient self-awareness were not associated with specific neurocognitive impairments.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients suffering from newly-diagnosed brain tumors presenting in good neurological condition display neurocognitive impairments in various domains. Larger tumor volumes, frontal location, and left/dominant hemisphere are important predictors for potential neurocognitive deficits. Tumor type, clinical presentation, or self-awareness are less significant at the time of diagnosis.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Brain tumor; Cognition; Frontal lobe; Left hemisphere; Neurocognitive assessment

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28334687     DOI: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2017.03.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Neurol Neurosurg        ISSN: 0303-8467            Impact factor:   1.876


  14 in total

1.  Near Infrared Fluorescent Nanoplatform for Targeted Intraoperative Resection and Chemotherapeutic Treatment of Glioblastoma.

Authors:  Derek Reichel; Bien Sagong; James Teh; Yi Zhang; Shawn Wagner; Hongqiang Wang; Leland W K Chung; Pramod Butte; Keith L Black; John S Yu; J Manuel Perez
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2020-06-23       Impact factor: 15.881

Review 2.  Depression and glioblastoma, complicated concomitant diseases: a systemic review of published literature.

Authors:  Luke Mugge; Tarek R Mansour; Megan Crippen; Yasaman Alam; Jason Schroeder
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2018-08-09       Impact factor: 3.042

3.  Preoperative predictive factors affecting return to work in patients with gliomas undergoing awake brain mapping.

Authors:  Akihito Yoshida; Kazuya Motomura; Atsushi Natsume; Lushun Chalise; Kentaro Iijima; Daisuke Hara; Izumi Kadono; Kenji Wakai; Toshihiko Wakabayashi
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2019-12-18       Impact factor: 4.130

4.  Antiepileptic and psychiatric medication in a nationwide cohort of patients with glioma WHO grade II-IV.

Authors:  Kristin Marie Knudsen-Baas; Tom Børge Johannesen; Tor Åge Myklebust; Jan Harald Aarseth; Jone Furlund Owe; Nils Erik Gilhus; Anette Margrethe Storstein
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2018-11-23       Impact factor: 4.130

5.  Cognitive outcomes in meningioma patients undergoing surgery: individual changes over time and predictors of late cognitive functioning.

Authors:  Sophie J M Rijnen; Ikram Meskal; Marjan Bakker; Wouter De Baene; Geert-Jan M Rutten; Karin Gehring; Margriet M Sitskoorn
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2019-07-11       Impact factor: 12.300

6.  Post-traumatic stress disorders in patients with low-grade glioma and its association with survival.

Authors:  Che Jiang; Jiajia Wang
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2019-01-31       Impact factor: 4.130

7.  Task-evoked reconfiguration of the fronto-parietal network is associated with cognitive performance in brain tumor patients.

Authors:  Wouter De Baene; Martijn J Jansma; Irena T Schouwenaars; Geert-Jan M Rutten; Margriet M Sitskoorn
Journal:  Brain Imaging Behav       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 3.978

8.  Presurgical Identification of Patients With Glioblastoma at Risk for Cognitive Impairment at 3-Month Follow-up.

Authors:  Sophie J M Rijnen; Elke Butterbrod; Geert-Jan M Rutten; Margriet M Sitskoorn; Karin Gehring
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2020-11-16       Impact factor: 4.654

Review 9.  Subtle neuropsychiatric symptoms of glioblastoma multiforme misdiagnosed as depression.

Authors:  Raphael Jerome Leo; Jill N Frodey; Matthew L Ruggieri
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2020-03-17

Review 10.  Graph Theoretical Analysis of Brain Network Characteristics in Brain Tumor Patients: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Eric S Semmel; Tobiloba R Quadri; Tricia Z King
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev       Date:  2021-07-07       Impact factor: 6.940

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.