BACKGROUND: In a complex health system, it is important to establish a systematic and data-driven approach to identifying needs. The Diabetes Clinical Community (DCC) of Johns Hopkins Medicine's Armstrong Institute for Patient Safety and Quality developed a gap analysis tool and process to establish the system's current state of inpatient diabetes care. METHODS: The collectively developed tool assessed the following areas: program infrastructure; protocols, policies, and order sets; patient and health care professional education; and automated data access. For the purposes of this analysis, gaps were defined as those instances in which local resources, infrastructure, or processes demonstrated a variance against the current national evidence base or institutionally defined best practices. RESULTS: Following the gap analysis, members of the DCC, in collaboration with health system leadership, met to identify priority areas in order to integrate and synergize diabetes care resources and efforts to enhance quality and reduce disparities in care across the system. Key gaps in care identified included lack of standardized glucose management policies, lack of standardized training of health care professionals in inpatient diabetes management, and lack of access to automated data collection and analysis. These results were used to gain resources to support collaborative diabetes health system initiatives and to successfully obtain federal research funding to develop and pilot a pragmatic diabetes educational intervention. CONCLUSION: At a health system level, the summary format of this gap analysis tool is an effective method to clearly identify disparities in care to focus efforts and resources to improve care delivery.
BACKGROUND: In a complex health system, it is important to establish a systematic and data-driven approach to identifying needs. The Diabetes Clinical Community (DCC) of Johns Hopkins Medicine's Armstrong Institute for Patient Safety and Quality developed a gap analysis tool and process to establish the system's current state of inpatient diabetes care. METHODS: The collectively developed tool assessed the following areas: program infrastructure; protocols, policies, and order sets; patient and health care professional education; and automated data access. For the purposes of this analysis, gaps were defined as those instances in which local resources, infrastructure, or processes demonstrated a variance against the current national evidence base or institutionally defined best practices. RESULTS: Following the gap analysis, members of the DCC, in collaboration with health system leadership, met to identify priority areas in order to integrate and synergize diabetes care resources and efforts to enhance quality and reduce disparities in care across the system. Key gaps in care identified included lack of standardized glucose management policies, lack of standardized training of health care professionals in inpatient diabetes management, and lack of access to automated data collection and analysis. These results were used to gain resources to support collaborative diabetes health system initiatives and to successfully obtain federal research funding to develop and pilot a pragmatic diabetes educational intervention. CONCLUSION: At a health system level, the summary format of this gap analysis tool is an effective method to clearly identify disparities in care to focus efforts and resources to improve care delivery.
Authors: Miguel Munoz; Peter Pronovost; Joanne Dintzis; Theresa Kemmerer; Nae-Yuh Wang; Yi-Ting Chang; Leigh Efird; Sean M Berenholtz; Sherita Hill Golden Journal: Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf Date: 2012-05
Authors: Yun Wang; Noel Eldridge; Mark L Metersky; Nancy R Verzier; Thomas P Meehan; Michelle M Pandolfi; JoAnne M Foody; Shih-Yieh Ho; Deron Galusha; Rebecca E Kliman; Nancy Sonnenfeld; Harlan M Krumholz; James Battles Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2014-01-23 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Lois J Gould; Patricia A Wachter; Hanan Aboumatar; Renee J Blanding; Daniel J Brotman; Janine Bullard; Maureen M Gilmore; Sherita Hill Golden; Eric Howell; Lisa Ishii; K H Ken Lee; Martin G Paul; Leo C Rotello; Andrew J Satin; Elizabeth C Wick; Laura Winner; Michael E Zenilman; Peter J Pronovost Journal: Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf Date: 2015-09
Authors: Renee E Amori; Anastassios G Pittas; Richard D Siegel; Sanjaya Kumar; Jack S Chen; Suneel Karnam; Sherita H Golden; Deeb N Salem Journal: Endocr Pract Date: 2008 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 3.443
Authors: Etie S Moghissi; Mary T Korytkowski; Monica DiNardo; Daniel Einhorn; Richard Hellman; Irl B Hirsch; Silvio E Inzucchi; Faramarz Ismail-Beigi; M Sue Kirkman; Guillermo E Umpierrez Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2009-05-08 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Mitchel D Armstrong; Alberto V Carli; Hesham Abdelbary; Stephane Poitras; Peter Lapner; Paule E Beaulé Journal: Can J Surg Date: 2018-02 Impact factor: 2.089
Authors: Isobel Ramsay; Katherine Sharrocks; Ben Warne; Nyarie Sithole; Pooja Ravji; Rachel Bousfield; Nick Jones; Clare E Leong; Mohamed Suliman; Rachel Tsui; Michelle S Toleman; Christine Moody; Richard Smith; James Whitehorn; Theodore Gouliouris; Florentina Penciu; Christian Hofling; Chris Cunningham; David A Enoch; Elinor Moore Journal: J Infect Prev Date: 2022-05-16
Authors: Nestoras Mathioudakis; Holly Bashura; LaPricia Boyér; Susan Langan; Bama S Padmanaban; Shamil Fayzullin; Sam Sokolinsky; Sherita Hill Golden Journal: J Med Educ Curric Dev Date: 2019-07-15