Literature DB >> 28334528

Why Prodrugs and Propesticides Succeed.

John E Casida1.   

Abstract

What are the advantages of bioactivation in optimizing drugs and pesticides? Why are there so many prodrugs and propesticides? These questions are examined here by considering compounds selected on the basis of economic value or market success in 2015. The 100 major drugs and 90 major pesticides are divided into ones acting directly and those definitely or possibly requiring bioactivation. Established or candidate prodrugs accounted for 19% of the total drug sales, with corresponding values of 20, 37, and 17% for proinsecticides, proherbicides, and profungicides. The 19 prodrugs acting in humans generally had better pharmacodynamic/pharmacokinetic properties for target enzyme, receptor, tissue, or organ specificity due to their physical properties (lipophilicity and stabilization). Bioactivation usually involved hydrolases or cytochrome P450 oxidation or reduction. Prodrugs considered are neuroactive aripiprazole, eletriptan, desvenlafaxin, lisdexamfetamine, quetiapine, and fesoterodine; cholesterol-lowering atorvastatin, ezetimibe, and fenofibrate; various prodrugs activated by esterases or sulfatases, ciclesonide, oseltamivir, dabigatran; omega-3 fatty acid ethyl esters and esterone sulfate; and five others with various targets (sofosbuvir, fingolimod, clopidogrel, dapsone, and sildenafil). The proinsecticides are the neuroactive chlorpyrifos, thiamethoxam, and indoxacarb, two spiro enol ester inhibitors of acetyl CoA carboxylase (ACCase), and the bacterial protein delta-endotoxin. The proherbicides considered are five ACCase inhibitors including pinoxaden and clethodim, three protox inhibitors (saflufenacil, flumioxazin, and canfentrazone-ethyl), and three with various targets (fluroxypyr, isoxaflutole, and clomazone). The profungicides are prothioconazole, mancozeb, thiophanate-methyl, dazomet, and fosetyl-aluminum. The prodrug and propesticide concept is broadly applicable and has created some of the most selective pharmaceutical and pest control agents, illustrated here by major compounds that partially overcome pharmacokinetic limitations of potency and selectivity in the corresponding direct-acting compounds. The challenges of molecular design extend beyond the target site fit to the bioactivatable precursor and the fascinating chemistry and biology matched against the complexity of life processes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28334528     DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemrestox.7b00030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol        ISSN: 0893-228X            Impact factor:   3.739


  5 in total

Review 1.  The ABCs of pesticide toxicology: amounts, biology, and chemistry.

Authors:  John E Casida; Robert J Bryant
Journal:  Toxicol Res (Camb)       Date:  2017-08-22       Impact factor: 3.524

2.  Workflow for defining reference chemicals for assessing performance of in vitro assays.

Authors:  Richard S Judson; Russell S Thomas; Nancy Baker; Anita Simha; Xia Meng Howey; Carmen Marable; Nicole C Kleinstreuer; Keith A Houck
Journal:  ALTEX       Date:  2018-12-17       Impact factor: 6.043

3.  Conjugates of 3-phenyllactic acid and tryptophan enhance root-promoting activity without adverse effects in Vigna angularis.

Authors:  Yuko Maki; Hiroshi Soejima; Tamizi Sugiyama; Takeo Sato; Junji Yamaguchi; Masaaki K Watahiki
Journal:  Plant Biotechnol (Tokyo)       Date:  2022-06-25       Impact factor: 1.308

4.  Prothioconazole induces cell cycle arrest by up-regulation of EIF4EBP1 in extravillous trophoblast cells.

Authors:  Guangzhu Dong; Rui Zhang; Qi Hu; Elizabeth M Martin; Yufeng Qin; Chuncheng Lu; Yankai Xia; Xinru Wang; Guizhen Du
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2022-01-20       Impact factor: 5.153

Review 5.  Change the channel: CysLoop receptor antagonists from nature.

Authors:  Guanghu Tong; Meghan A Baker; Ryan A Shenvi
Journal:  Pest Manag Sci       Date:  2020-11-22       Impact factor: 4.462

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.