Literature DB >> 28334518

Percutaneous biopsy of the renal mass: FNA or core needle biopsy?

Chi-Shun Yang1, Euna Choi2, Muhammad T Idrees2, Shaoxiong Chen2, Howard H Wu2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In recent years, there have been increasing indications for percutaneous renal biopsy. Fine-needle aspiration (FNA), with or without core needle biopsy (CB), has been used increasingly in the management of renal tumors at the study institution.
METHODS: A computerized search of laboratory records was conducted to retrieve FNA cases of renal masses as well as the correlating CB and/or nephrectomy specimens. The cases spanned a period of 10 years (2006-2015). The diagnoses were classified into 5 categories: malignant, suspicious for malignancy, neoplastic, atypical, and negative/nondiagnostic. Based on the results of the nephrectomy specimens, the diagnostic rate, sensitivity, and diagnostic accuracy were calculated among 3 groups of specimens: FNA only, CB only, and combined FNA and CB.
RESULTS: A total of 247 cases of FNA with 123 correlating CB and 101 follow-up nephrectomy specimens were identified. The diagnostic rate, sensitivity, and diagnostic accuracy were 72%, 78%, and 96%, respectively, for FNA; 87%, 92%, and 94%, respectively, for CB; and 92%, 92%, and 94%, respectively, for the combined FNA and CB group. Renal cell carcinoma and its variants were the most common histologic diagnoses (112 of 174 cases; 64%). Significant diagnostic discrepancy was noted in one case: a malignant melanoma that was misdiagnosed as renal cell carcinoma in both the preoperative FNA specimen and in the CB specimen.
CONCLUSIONS: In the current study, both FNA and CB demonstrated excellent diagnostic accuracy (96% and 94%, respectively). The combination of FNA and CB was found to significantly improve the diagnostic rate when compared with either FNA alone (92% vs 72%; P<.05) or CB alone (92% vs 87%). Cancer Cytopathol 2017;125:407-15.
© 2017 American Cancer Society. © 2017 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  core needle biopsy (CB); cytology; fine-needle aspiration (FNA); renal cell carcinoma (RCC); renal tumors

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28334518     DOI: 10.1002/cncy.21852

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Cytopathol        ISSN: 1934-662X            Impact factor:   5.284


  5 in total

Review 1.  [Limits of surgery in uro-oncology].

Authors:  A Heidenreich
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 0.639

2.  Can we Avoid the Unnecessary Loss of nephrons in the Management of Small Solid Renal Masses? Additional Clinical Parameters to Predict Benign-malign Distinction.

Authors:  Ismail Selvi; Halil Basar
Journal:  Sisli Etfal Hastan Tip Bul       Date:  2021-03-17

3.  Intraoperative Label-Free Multimodal Nonlinear Optical Imaging for Point-of-Procedure Cancer Diagnostics.

Authors:  Lingxiao Yang; Jaena Park; Marina Marjanovic; Eric J Chaney; Darold R Spillman; Heidi Phillips; Stephen A Boppart
Journal:  IEEE J Sel Top Quantum Electron       Date:  2021-01-26       Impact factor: 4.544

Review 4.  Renal Oncocytoma: The Diagnostic Challenge to Unmask the Double of Renal Cancer.

Authors:  Francesco Trevisani; Matteo Floris; Roberto Minnei; Alessandra Cinque
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-02-26       Impact factor: 5.923

5.  Fine needle aspirates of kidneys: a promising tool for RNA sequencing in native and transplanted kidneys.

Authors:  Øystein Eikrem; Tedd C Walther; Arnar Flatberg; Vidar Beisvag; Philipp Strauss; Magnus Farstad; Christian Beisland; Even Koch; Thomas F Mueller; Hans-Peter Marti
Journal:  BMC Nephrol       Date:  2018-09-05       Impact factor: 2.388

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.