Literature DB >> 28334384

The cancer paradigms of mammalian regeneration: can mammals regenerate as amphibians?

Rachel Sarig1, Eldad Tzahor1.   

Abstract

Regeneration in mammals is restricted to distinct tissues and occurs mainly by expansion and maturation of resident stem cells. During regeneration, even subtle mutations in the proliferating cells may cause a detrimental effect by eliciting abnormal differentiation or malignant transformation. Indeed, cancer in mammals has been shown to arise through deregulation of stem cells maturation, which often leads to a differentiation block and cell transformation. In contrast, lower organisms such as amphibians retain a remarkable regenerative capacity in various organs, which occurs via de- and re-differentiation of mature cells. Interestingly, regenerating amphibian cells are highly resistant to oncogenic transformation. Therapeutic approaches to improve mammalian regeneration mainly include stem-cell transplantations; but, these have proved unsuccessful in non-regenerating organs such as the heart. A recently developed approach is to induce de-differentiation of mature cardiomyocytes using factors that trigger their re-entry into the cell cycle. This novel approach raises numerous questions regarding the balance between transformation and regeneration induced by de-differentiation of mature mammalian somatic cells. Can this balance be controlled artificially? Do de-differentiated cells acquire the protection mechanisms seen in regenerating cells of lower organisms? Is this model unique to the cardiac tissue, which rarely develops tumors? This review describes regeneration processes in both mammals and lower organisms and, particularly, the ability of regenerating cells to avoid transformation. By comparing the characteristics of mammalian embryonic and somatic cells, we discuss therapeutic strategies of using various cell populations for regeneration. Finally, we describe a novel cardiac regeneration approach and its implications for regenerative medicine.
© The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28334384     DOI: 10.1093/carcin/bgw103

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Carcinogenesis        ISSN: 0143-3334            Impact factor:   4.944


  9 in total

Review 1.  Dedifferentiation: inspiration for devising engineering strategies for regenerative medicine.

Authors:  Yongchang Yao; Chunming Wang
Journal:  NPJ Regen Med       Date:  2020-07-31

2.  Gene expression in regenerating and scarring tails of lizard evidences three main key genes (wnt2b, egfl6, and arhgap28) activated during the regulated process of tail regeneration.

Authors:  Massimo Degan; Luisa Dalla Valle; Lorenzo Alibardi
Journal:  Protoplasma       Date:  2020-08-27       Impact factor: 3.356

3.  From Autonomy to Integration, From Integration to Dynamically Balanced Integrated Co-existence: Non-aging as the Third Stage of Development.

Authors:  Lev Salnikov; Mamuka G Baramiya
Journal:  Front Aging       Date:  2021-03-25

Review 4.  Dedifferentiation: inspiration for devising engineering strategies for regenerative medicine.

Authors:  Yongchang Yao; Chunming Wang
Journal:  NPJ Regen Med       Date:  2020-07-31

5.  Macrophages play a key role in tissue repair and regeneration.

Authors:  Yajie Yu; Zhongyu Yue; Mengli Xu; Meiling Zhang; Xue Shen; Zihan Ma; Juan Li; Xin Xie
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2022-09-29       Impact factor: 3.061

Review 6.  Salamanders: The molecular basis of tissue regeneration and its relevance to human disease.

Authors:  Claudia Marcela Arenas Gómez; Karen Echeverri
Journal:  Curr Top Dev Biol       Date:  2021-03-16       Impact factor: 4.897

Review 7.  Genomic and molecular control of cell type and cell type conversions.

Authors:  Xiuling Fu; Fangfang He; Yuhao Li; Allahverdi Shahveranov; Andrew Paul Hutchins
Journal:  Cell Regen (Lond)       Date:  2017-11-22

8.  Different genetic mechanisms mediate spontaneous versus UVR-induced malignant melanoma.

Authors:  Blake Ferguson; Herlina Y Handoko; Pamela Mukhopadhyay; Arash Chitsazan; Lois Balmer; Grant Morahan; Graeme J Walker
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2019-01-25       Impact factor: 8.140

9.  Hepatitis B core antigen modulates exosomal miR-135a to target vesicle-associated membrane protein 2 promoting chemoresistance in hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Xiao-Cui Wei; Ya-Ru Xia; Ping Zhou; Xing Xue; Shuang Ding; Li-Juan Liu; Fan Zhu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2021-12-28       Impact factor: 5.742

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.