PURPOSE: To evaluate the relationship between outer retinal layer (ORL) thickness in diabetic macular edema to visual acuity (VA). METHODS: Ninety-five eyes were included in this prospective nonrandomized case-control study. They divided into 30 cases of healthy normal subjects and 65 cases of nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy with diabetic macular edema. Complete ophthalmic examination and spectral domain-optical coherence tomography were done for all cases and analyzed to measure central foveal point thickness (CFT), ORL thickness at fovea, and subfoveal choroidal thickness. RESULTS: The ORL thickness was significantly thinner in diabetic macular edema group (85.3 μm) than controls (99.9 μm) (P = 0.002). There was higher significant correlation between ORL thickness and logMAR VA (r = -0.87, P < 0.001) than correlation between CFT and VA (r = 0.18, P = 0.16). The cutoff point of the relationship between ORL thickness and VA was 88 μm with moderate sensitivity (81%) and high specificity (88%), below which vision is affected. Outer retinal layer thickness is significantly related to subfoveal choroidal thickness but not CFT. CONCLUSION: This study revealed reduction in ORL thickness in diabetic macular edema. There is a higher and stronger correlation between ORL thickness and vision than that between CFT and vision.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the relationship between outer retinal layer (ORL) thickness in diabetic macular edema to visual acuity (VA). METHODS: Ninety-five eyes were included in this prospective nonrandomized case-control study. They divided into 30 cases of healthy normal subjects and 65 cases of nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy with diabetic macular edema. Complete ophthalmic examination and spectral domain-optical coherence tomography were done for all cases and analyzed to measure central foveal point thickness (CFT), ORL thickness at fovea, and subfoveal choroidal thickness. RESULTS: The ORL thickness was significantly thinner in diabetic macular edema group (85.3 μm) than controls (99.9 μm) (P = 0.002). There was higher significant correlation between ORL thickness and logMAR VA (r = -0.87, P < 0.001) than correlation between CFT and VA (r = 0.18, P = 0.16). The cutoff point of the relationship between ORL thickness and VA was 88 μm with moderate sensitivity (81%) and high specificity (88%), below which vision is affected. Outer retinal layer thickness is significantly related to subfoveal choroidal thickness but not CFT. CONCLUSION: This study revealed reduction in ORL thickness in diabetic macular edema. There is a higher and stronger correlation between ORL thickness and vision than that between CFT and vision.
Authors: Jorge S Andrade Romo; Giselle Lynch; Kevin Liu; Daniel Kim; Michael Jansen; Matthew G Field; Victor M Elner; Richard B Rosen Journal: Oxid Med Cell Longev Date: 2018-08-09 Impact factor: 6.543
Authors: José Ignacio Orlando; Bianca S Gerendas; Sophie Riedl; Christoph Grechenig; Anna Breger; Martin Ehler; Sebastian M Waldstein; Hrvoje Bogunović; Ursula Schmidt-Erfurth Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2020-03-27 Impact factor: 4.379