Literature DB >> 28333822

Committee Opinion No. 694: Management of Mesh and Graft Complications in Gynecologic Surgery.

.   

Abstract

This document focuses on the management of complications related to mesh used to correct stress urinary incontinence or pelvic organ prolapse. Persistent vaginal bleeding, vaginal discharge, or recurrent urinary tract infections after mesh placement should prompt an examination and possible further evaluation for exposure or erosion. A careful history and physical examination is essential in the diagnosis of mesh and graft complications. A clear understanding of the location and extent of mesh placement, as well as the patient's symptoms and therapy goals, are necessary to plan treatment approaches. It is important that a treating obstetrician-gynecologist or other gynecologic care provider who seeks to revise or remove implanted mesh be aware of the details of the index procedure. Diagnostic testing for a suspected mesh complication can include cystoscopy, proctoscopy, colonoscopy, or radiologic imaging. These tests should be pursued to answer specific questions related to management. Given the diverse nature of complications related to mesh-augmented pelvic floor surgery, there are no universal recommendations regarding minimum testing. Approaches to management of mesh-related complications in pelvic floor surgery include observation, physical therapy, medications, and surgery. Obstetrician-gynecologists should counsel women who are considering surgical revision or removal of mesh about the complex exchanges that can occur between positive and adverse pelvic floor functions across each additional procedure starting with the device implant. Detailed counseling regarding the risks and benefits of mesh revision or removal surgery is essential and can be conducted most thoroughly by a clinician who has experience performing these procedures. For women who are not symptomatic, there is no role for intervention.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28333822     DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  5 in total

1.  "Occult" pelvic abscess following previous robotic sacrocolpopexy.

Authors:  Brian J Linder; John B Gebhart
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2018-08-16       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  FPMRS challenges on behalf of the Collaborative Research in Pelvic Surgery Consortium (CoRPS): managing complicated cases series 4: is taking out all of a mesh sling too extreme?

Authors:  Emily B Rosenfeld; Ladin A Yurteri-Kaplan; Chris Maher; Tony Bazi; Kamil Svabik; Sara Houlihan; Cara L Grimes
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2019-12-02       Impact factor: 2.894

3.  Association between method of pelvic organ prolapse repair involving the vaginal apex and re-operation: a population-based, retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  You Maria Wu; Jennifer Reid; Queena Chou; Barry MacMillan; Yvonne Leong; Blayne Welk
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 2.894

4.  Recurrent Incontinence After Transvaginal Partial Sling Excision in Patients with Prior Mid-Urethral Sling.

Authors:  Robert Shapiro; Omar Felipe Dueñas-Garcia; Manuel Vallejo; Tyler Trump; Makenzy Sufficool; Stanley Zaslau
Journal:  Res Rep Urol       Date:  2021-01-12

5.  Long-term outcomes of transvaginal mesh surgery for pelvic organ prolapse: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Xiaojuan Wang; Yisong Chen; Changdong Hu; Keqin Hua
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2021-10-11       Impact factor: 2.809

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.