Sara De Fanti1, Saverio Vicario2, Martin Lang3,4, Domenico Simone5, Cristina Magli6, Donata Luiselli1, Luca Gianaroli6, Giovanni Romeo3. 1. Department of Biological, Geological and Environmental Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna 40126, Italy. 2. Institute of Atmospheric Pollution Research, National Research Council, C/O Physics Department, University of Bari 'Aldo Moro', Bari 70132, Italy. 3. Medical Genetics Unit, S. Orsola Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna 40126, Italy. 4. Current address: Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA. 5. Department of Bioscience, Biotechnology and Biopharmaceutics, University of Bari 'Aldo Moro',Bari70132, Italy. 6. Reproductive Medicine Unit, S.I.S.Me.R., Bologna 40138, Italy.
Abstract
STUDY QUESTION: Does selection for mtDNA mutations occur in human oocytes? SUMMARY ANSWER: We provide statistical evidence in favor of the existence of purifying selection for mtDNA mutations in human oocytes acting between the expulsion of the first and second polar bodies (PBs). WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Several lines of evidence in Metazoa, including humans, indicate that variation within the germline of mitochondrial genomes is under purifying selection. The presence of this internal selection filter in the germline has important consequences for the evolutionary trajectory of mtDNA. However, the nature and localization of this internal filter are still unclear while several hypotheses are proposed in the literature. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: In this study, 60 mitochondrial genomes were sequenced from 17 sets of oocytes, first and second PBs, and peripheral blood taken from nine women between 38 and 43 years of age. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Whole genome amplification was performed only on the single cell samples and Sanger sequencing was performed on amplicons. The comparison of variant profiles between first and second PB sequences showed no difference in substitution rates but displayed instead a sharp difference in pathogenicity scores of protein-coding sequences using three different metrics (MutPred, Polyphen and SNPs&GO). MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Unlike the first, second PBs showed no significant differences in pathogenic scores with blood and oocyte sequences. This suggests that a filtering mechanism for disadvantageous variants operates during oocyte development between the expulsion of the first and second PB. LARGE SCALE DATA: N/A. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: The sample size is small and further studies are needed before this approach can be used in clinical practice. Studies on a model organism would allow the sample size to be increased. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: This work opens the way to the study of the correlation between mtDNA mutations, mitochondrial capacity and viability of oocytes. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): This work was supported by a SISMER grant. Laboratory facilities and skills were freely provided by SISMER, and by the Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna. The authors have no conflict of interest to disclose.
STUDY QUESTION: Does selection for mtDNA mutations occur in human oocytes? SUMMARY ANSWER: We provide statistical evidence in favor of the existence of purifying selection for mtDNA mutations in human oocytes acting between the expulsion of the first and second polar bodies (PBs). WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Several lines of evidence in Metazoa, including humans, indicate that variation within the germline of mitochondrial genomes is under purifying selection. The presence of this internal selection filter in the germline has important consequences for the evolutionary trajectory of mtDNA. However, the nature and localization of this internal filter are still unclear while several hypotheses are proposed in the literature. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: In this study, 60 mitochondrial genomes were sequenced from 17 sets of oocytes, first and second PBs, and peripheral blood taken from nine women between 38 and 43 years of age. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Whole genome amplification was performed only on the single cell samples and Sanger sequencing was performed on amplicons. The comparison of variant profiles between first and second PB sequences showed no difference in substitution rates but displayed instead a sharp difference in pathogenicity scores of protein-coding sequences using three different metrics (MutPred, Polyphen and SNPs&GO). MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Unlike the first, second PBs showed no significant differences in pathogenic scores with blood and oocyte sequences. This suggests that a filtering mechanism for disadvantageous variants operates during oocyte development between the expulsion of the first and second PB. LARGE SCALE DATA: N/A. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: The sample size is small and further studies are needed before this approach can be used in clinical practice. Studies on a model organism would allow the sample size to be increased. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: This work opens the way to the study of the correlation between mtDNA mutations, mitochondrial capacity and viability of oocytes. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): This work was supported by a SISMER grant. Laboratory facilities and skills were freely provided by SISMER, and by the Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna. The authors have no conflict of interest to disclose.
Authors: Doron M Behar; Mannis van Oven; Saharon Rosset; Mait Metspalu; Eva-Liis Loogväli; Nuno M Silva; Toomas Kivisild; Antonio Torroni; Richard Villems Journal: Am J Hum Genet Date: 2012-04-06 Impact factor: 11.025
Authors: Robert W Gilkerson; Rosa L A De Vries; Paul Lebot; Jakob D Wikstrom; Edina Torgyekes; Orian S Shirihai; Serge Przedborski; Eric A Schon Journal: Hum Mol Genet Date: 2011-11-11 Impact factor: 6.150
Authors: Giuseppe Gasparre; Anna Maria Porcelli; Giorgio Lenaz; Giovanni Romeo Journal: Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol Date: 2013-02-01 Impact factor: 10.005
Authors: Giuseppe Gasparre; Anna Maria Porcelli; Elena Bonora; Lucia Fiammetta Pennisi; Matteo Toller; Luisa Iommarini; Anna Ghelli; Massimo Moretti; Christine M Betts; Giuseppe Nicola Martinelli; Alberto Rinaldi Ceroni; Francesco Curcio; Valerio Carelli; Michela Rugolo; Giovanni Tallini; Giovanni Romeo Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2007-05-15 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Brendan A I Payne; Ian J Wilson; Patrick Yu-Wai-Man; Jonathan Coxhead; David Deehan; Rita Horvath; Robert W Taylor; David C Samuels; Mauro Santibanez-Koref; Patrick F Chinnery Journal: Hum Mol Genet Date: 2012-10-16 Impact factor: 6.150
Authors: Justin C Havird; Evan S Forsythe; Alissa M Williams; John H Werren; Damian K Dowling; Daniel B Sloan Journal: Curr Biol Date: 2019-06-03 Impact factor: 10.834
Authors: Auke B C Otten; Suzanne C E H Sallevelt; Phillippa J Carling; Joseph C F M Dreesen; Marion Drüsedau; Sabine Spierts; Aimee D C Paulussen; Christine E M de Die-Smulders; Mary Herbert; Patrick F Chinnery; David C Samuels; Patrick Lindsey; Hubert J M Smeets Journal: Hum Reprod Date: 2018-07-01 Impact factor: 6.918
Authors: Fatma A Aljasmi; Ranjit Vijayan; Naganeeswaran Sudalaimuthuasari; Abdul-Kader Souid; Noushad Karuvantevida; Raja Almaskari; Hidaya Mohammed Abdul Kader; Biduth Kundu; Khaled Michel Hazzouri; Khaled M A Amiri Journal: Genes (Basel) Date: 2020-08-01 Impact factor: 4.096