Literature DB >> 28333252

Single-Layer Plication for Repair of Diastasis Recti: The Most Rapid and Efficient Technique.

Luiz José Muaccad Gama1, Marcus Vinicius Jardini Barbosa2, Adriano Czapkowski3, Sergio Ajzen4, Lydia Masako Ferreira5, Fábio Xerfan Nahas5.   

Abstract

Background: Plication of the anterior rectus sheath is the most commonly used technique for repair of diastasis recti, but is also a time-consuming procedure.
Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and time required to repair diastasis recti using different plication techniques.
Methods: Thirty women with similar abdominal deformities, who had had at least one pregnancy, were randomized into three groups to undergo abdominoplasty. Plication of the anterior rectus sheath was performed in two layers with 2-0 monofilament nylon suture (control group) or in a single layer with either a continuous 2-0 monofilament nylon suture (group I) or using a continuous barbed suture (group II). Operative time was recorded. All patients underwent ultrasound examination preoperatively and at 3 weeks and 6 months postoperatively to monitor for diastasis recurrence. The force required to bring the anterior rectus sheath to the midline was measured at the supraumbilical and infraumbilical levels.
Results: Patient age ranged from 26 to 50 years and body mass index from 20.56 to 29.17 kg/m2. A significant difference in mean operative time was found between the control and study groups (control group, 35 min:22 s; group I, 14 min:22 s; group II, 15 min:23 s; P < 0.001). Three patients in group II had recurrence of diastasis. There were no significant within- and between-group differences in tensile force on the aponeurosis. Conclusions: Plication of the anterior rectus sheath in a single-layer with a continuous suture showed to be an efficient and rapid technique for repair of diastasis recti.
© 2017 The American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, Inc. Reprints and permission: journals.permissions@oup.com

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28333252     DOI: 10.1093/asj/sjw263

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aesthet Surg J        ISSN: 1090-820X            Impact factor:   4.283


  7 in total

Review 1.  Open Versus Laparoscopic Surgical Management of Rectus Diastasis: Systematic Review and Pooled Analysis of Complications and Recurrence Rates.

Authors:  Hassan ElHawary; Christian Chartier; Peter Alam; Jeffrey E Janis
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2022-04-16       Impact factor: 3.282

Review 2.  Management Strategies for Diastasis Recti.

Authors:  Maurice Y Nahabedian
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2018-07-24       Impact factor: 2.314

3.  Improvement in Back Pain Following Abdominoplasty: Results of a 10-Year, Single-Surgeon Series.

Authors:  Carol E Soteropulos; Kylie M Edinger; Kayla E Leibl; John W Siebert
Journal:  Aesthet Surg J       Date:  2020-11-19       Impact factor: 4.283

4.  A new minimally invasive technique for the repair of diastasis recti: a pilot study.

Authors:  Gabriele Manetti; Maria Giulia Lolli; Elena Belloni; Giuseppe Nigri
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2021-03-04       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Laparoscopic Repair of Diastasis Recti: A Case Report and Literature Review.

Authors:  Woohyung Lee; Jin-Kyu Cho; Jae Yool Jang; Soon-Chan Hong; Chi-Young Jeong
Journal:  J Minim Invasive Surg       Date:  2019-09-15

6.  The Expanding Role of Diagnostic Ultrasound in Plastic Surgery.

Authors:  Eric Swanson
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2018-09-05

7.  Long-term follow-up after surgical repair of abdominal rectus diastasis: A Prospective Randomized Study.

Authors:  Ebba Swedenhammar; Karin Strigård; Peter Emanuelsson; Ulf Gunnarsson; Birgit Stark
Journal:  Scand J Surg       Date:  2020-04-17       Impact factor: 2.360

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.