P Jadoul1, A Guilmain1, J Squifflet1, M Luyckx1, R Votino1, C Wyns1, M M Dolmans1. 1. Gynecology Department, Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique (IREC), Université Catholique de Louvain (UCL) and Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Avenue Hippocrate, 10, 1200 Brussels, Belgium.
Abstract
STUDY QUESTION: How effective is ovarian tissue cryopreservation (OTC)? SUMMARY ANSWER: In our cohort of patients who underwent OTC, premature ovarian failure (POF) rates, return rates and pregnancy rates after autotransplantation were 31.5, 4.4 and 33%, respectively. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: OTC for fertility purposes has been performed for >20 years now. With over 86 live births reported worldwide and success rates of ~30% after autotransplantation of frozen-thawed ovarian cortex, the procedure should no longer be considered experimental. However, very few publications report the efficacy of this procedure. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: Cases of ovarian tissue cryobanking for fertility preservation performed between 1997 and 2013 in a single institution were reviewed by analysis of the cryobank database and a prospective questionnaire sent out in March 2015. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: There were 545 patients who underwent OTC during this period. The analysis included indications for OTC, survival rates, ovarian function and spontaneous pregnancies after OTC, come-back rates for ovarian tissue transplantation, pregnancy rates after transplantation, and complication and satisfaction rates. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: OTC was performed in this cohort at a mean age of 22.3 ± 8.8 years for oncological indications (79%), benign gynecological pathologies (17.5%) and genetic risks of POF (3.5%). Of the 545 patients, 29% were under 18 years of age at the time of OTC and 15% were prepubertal. While 10% of patients died from their disease, 21 patients (3.9%) underwent autotransplantation, 7 of whom delivered a healthy baby, yielding a post-transplantation live birth rate of 33%. Of 451 patients who were sent the questionnaire, 143 agreed to respond (32%). Nevertheless, ovarian function could not be evaluated in 36% of those who answered. Of 92 evaluable patients, 31.5% were menopausal and 68.5% showed persistent ovarian function. Of 52 women who attempted to conceive naturally, 37 were successful (71%). Among 140 patients who answered the questionnaire, 96% were satisfied with the procedure and only 1 major complication (intra-abdominal hemorrhage) was encountered. Among all the patients, 12% have donated their ovarian cortex for research purposes or have had it destroyed. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: The questionnaire participation rate (32%), limited follow-up (mean 7.6 ± 3.5 years) and use of only clinical criteria for evaluation of ovarian function made it difficult to accurately assess the risk of POF and efficiency of OTC. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: Our findings confirm a 30% pregnancy rate after ovarian cortex autotransplantation but also stress the difficulties of evaluating the real efficacy of OTC. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): No funding was sought for this study and none of the authors have any conflict of interest. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov Registration ID: CRYOFONOV01.
STUDY QUESTION: How effective is ovarian tissue cryopreservation (OTC)? SUMMARY ANSWER: In our cohort of patients who underwent OTC, premature ovarian failure (POF) rates, return rates and pregnancy rates after autotransplantation were 31.5, 4.4 and 33%, respectively. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: OTC for fertility purposes has been performed for >20 years now. With over 86 live births reported worldwide and success rates of ~30% after autotransplantation of frozen-thawed ovarian cortex, the procedure should no longer be considered experimental. However, very few publications report the efficacy of this procedure. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: Cases of ovarian tissue cryobanking for fertility preservation performed between 1997 and 2013 in a single institution were reviewed by analysis of the cryobank database and a prospective questionnaire sent out in March 2015. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: There were 545 patients who underwent OTC during this period. The analysis included indications for OTC, survival rates, ovarian function and spontaneous pregnancies after OTC, come-back rates for ovarian tissue transplantation, pregnancy rates after transplantation, and complication and satisfaction rates. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: OTC was performed in this cohort at a mean age of 22.3 ± 8.8 years for oncological indications (79%), benign gynecological pathologies (17.5%) and genetic risks of POF (3.5%). Of the 545 patients, 29% were under 18 years of age at the time of OTC and 15% were prepubertal. While 10% of patients died from their disease, 21 patients (3.9%) underwent autotransplantation, 7 of whom delivered a healthy baby, yielding a post-transplantation live birth rate of 33%. Of 451 patients who were sent the questionnaire, 143 agreed to respond (32%). Nevertheless, ovarian function could not be evaluated in 36% of those who answered. Of 92 evaluable patients, 31.5% were menopausal and 68.5% showed persistent ovarian function. Of 52 women who attempted to conceive naturally, 37 were successful (71%). Among 140 patients who answered the questionnaire, 96% were satisfied with the procedure and only 1 major complication (intra-abdominal hemorrhage) was encountered. Among all the patients, 12% have donated their ovarian cortex for research purposes or have had it destroyed. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: The questionnaire participation rate (32%), limited follow-up (mean 7.6 ± 3.5 years) and use of only clinical criteria for evaluation of ovarian function made it difficult to accurately assess the risk of POF and efficiency of OTC. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: Our findings confirm a 30% pregnancy rate after ovarian cortex autotransplantation but also stress the difficulties of evaluating the real efficacy of OTC. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): No funding was sought for this study and none of the authors have any conflict of interest. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov Registration ID: CRYOFONOV01.
Authors: Anniek Bus; Veerle van Hoeck; An Langbeen; Jo L M R Leroy; Peter E J Bols Journal: J Assist Reprod Genet Date: 2018-05-24 Impact factor: 3.412
Authors: Ruba A Akel; Xiaoyue M Guo; Molly B Moravek; Rafael Confino; Kristin N Smith; Angela K Lawson; Susan C Klock; Edward J Tanner Iii; Mary Ellen Pavone Journal: J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol Date: 2020-01-10 Impact factor: 2.223
Authors: S E Gellert; S E Pors; S G Kristensen; A M Bay-Bjørn; E Ernst; C Yding Andersen Journal: J Assist Reprod Genet Date: 2018-03-01 Impact factor: 3.412
Authors: Anniek Bus; Katarzyna Szymanska; Isabel Pintelon; Jo L M R Leroy; Luc Leybaert; Peter E J Bols Journal: J Assist Reprod Genet Date: 2020-11-06 Impact factor: 3.412