Literature DB >> 28333019

A Comparison Between Low-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy With or Without Androgen Deprivation, External Beam Radiation Therapy With or Without Androgen Deprivation, and Radical Prostatectomy With or Without Adjuvant or Salvage Radiation Therapy for High-Risk Prostate Cancer.

Jay P Ciezki1, Michael Weller2, Chandana A Reddy2, Jeffrey Kittel2, Harguneet Singh2, Rahul Tendulkar2, Kevin L Stephans2, James Ulchaker3, Kenneth Angermeier3, Andrew Stephenson3, Steven Campbell3, Georges-Pascal Haber3, Eric A Klein3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We compare the efficacy and toxicity among the 3 major modalities available used to treat high-risk prostate cancer (HRCaP). METHODS AND MATERIALS: From 1996 to 2012, 2557 HRCaP patients were treated: 734 received external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) with or without androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), 515 received low-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy (LDR) with or without ADT, and 1308 received radical prostatectomy (RP) with or without EBRT. Biochemical relapse-free survival (bRFS), clinical relapse-free survival (cRFS), and prostate cancer-specific mortality (PCSM) were assessed. Toxicity was assessed using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4.03. The log-rank test compared bRFS and cRFS among the modalities, and Cox regression identified factors associated with bRFS and cRFS. Gray's test compared differences in late toxicity and PSCM among the modalities. Competing risk regression identified factors associated with PCSM.
RESULTS: The median follow-up time and age were 63.5 months and 65 years, respectively. The bRFS at 5 and 10 years, respectively, was 74% and 53% for EBRT, 74% and 52% for LDR, and 65% and 47% for RP (P=.0001). The cRFS at 5 and 10 years, respectively, was 85% and 73% for EBRT, 90% and 76% for LDR, and 89% and 75% for RP (P=.121). The PCSM at 5 and 10 years, respectively, was 5.3% and 11.2% for EBRT, 3.2% and 3.6% for LDR, and 2.8% and 6.8% for RP (P=.0004). The 10-year cumulative incidence of ≥grade 3 genitourinary toxicity was 8.1% for EBRT, 7.2% for LDR, and 16.4% for RP (P<.0001). The 10-year cumulative incidence of ≥grade 3 gastrointestinal toxicity was 4.6% for EBRT, 1.1% for LDR, and 1.0% for RP (P<.0001).
CONCLUSION: HRCaP treated with EBRT, LDR, or RP yields efficacy showing better bRFS for LDR and EBRT relative to RP, equivalence for cRFS, and a PCSM advantage of LDR and RP over EBRT. The toxicity is lowest for LDR.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28333019     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2016.12.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  8 in total

1.  Long-term outcomes of partial prostate treatment with magnetic resonance imaging-guided brachytherapy for patients with favorable-risk prostate cancer.

Authors:  Martin T King; Paul L Nguyen; Ninjin Boldbaatar; Clare M Tempany; Robert A Cormack; Clair J Beard; Mark D Hurwitz; W Warren Suh; Anthony V D'Amico; Peter F Orio
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2018-07-05       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  Reduction of seed motion using a bio-absorbable polymer coating during permanent prostate brachytherapy using a mick applicator technique.

Authors:  Gregory R Warrell; Yan Xing; Tarun K Podder; Bryan J Traughber; Rodney J Ellis
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2018-04-17       Impact factor: 2.102

3.  The role of radical prostatectomy and definitive external beam radiotherapy in combined treatment for high-risk prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xu Cheng; Zhi-Hui Wang; Mou Peng; Zhi-Chao Huang; Lu Yi; Yi-Jian Li; Lei Yi; Wen-Zhi Luo; Jia-Wen Chen; Yin-Huai Wang
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2020 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.285

Review 4.  Combined Modality Therapies for High-Risk Prostate Cancer: Narrative Review of Current Understanding and New Directions.

Authors:  Benjamin A Greenberger; Victor E Chen; Robert B Den
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2019-11-29       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 5.  Radiation therapy compared to radical prostatectomy as first-line definitive therapy for patients with high-risk localised prostate cancer: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Abdulmajeed Aydh; Reza Sari Motlagh; Mohammad Abufaraj; Keiichiro Mori; Satoshi Katayama; Nico Grossmann; Pawel Rajwa; Hadi Mostafai; Ekaterina Laukhtina; Benjamin Pradere; Fahad Quhal; Victor M Schuettfort; Alberto Briganti; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Haron Fajkovic; Shahrokh F Shariat
Journal:  Arab J Urol       Date:  2022-03-30

Review 6.  GammaTile: Comprehensive Review of a Novel Radioactive Intraoperative Seed-Loading Device for the Treatment of Brain Tumors.

Authors:  Chukwuyem Ekhator; Ijeoma Nwankwo; Elya Rak; Ariel Homayoonfar; Ekokobe Fonkem; Ramin Rak
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-10-06

7.  A comparison between high dose rate brachytherapy and stereotactic body radiotherapy boost after elective pelvic irradiation for high and very high-risk prostate cancer.

Authors:  Sergey Nikolaevich Novikov; Roman Vladimirovich Novikov; Yurii Olegovich Merezhko; Mariya Yurevna Gotovchikova; Nikolai Dmitrievich Ilin; Yulia Sergeevna Melnik; Sergey Vasilevich Kanaev
Journal:  Radiat Oncol J       Date:  2022-09-30

8.  Predicting the Risk of Metastases by PSMA-PET/CT-Evaluation of 335 Men with Treatment-Naïve Prostate Carcinoma.

Authors:  Stefan A Koerber; Johannes Boesch; Clemens Kratochwil; Ingmar Schlampp; Jonas Ristau; Erik Winter; Stefanie Zschaebitz; Luisa Hofer; Klaus Herfarth; Klaus Kopka; Tim Holland-Letz; Dirk Jaeger; Markus Hohenfellner; Uwe Haberkorn; Juergen Debus; Frederik L Giesel
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-25       Impact factor: 6.639

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.