Literature DB >> 2833289

Comparison of the interoceptive sensory consequences of CCK, LiCl, and satiety in rats.

T L Davidson1, F W Flynn, H J Grill.   

Abstract

In three experiments we assessed the degree to which ad lib feeding, injection of cholecystokinin (CCK), and injection of lithium chloride (LiCl) produce states with similar sensory consequences. In each experiment, two groups of rats were trained to use cues arising from food deprivation and satiation as discriminative signals for shock. One group was shocked when deprived but not when nondeprived. The other group received the reversed discrimination. Testing began when incidence of freezing was greater under the shocked deprivation than under the nonshocked deprivation condition. In Experiment 1, the rats were tested under 24-hr food deprivation after injections of CCK, LiCl, and saline (in counterbalanced order). We reasoned that if either CCK or LiCl induce satiety-like states, they should promote patterns of responding different from those produced by saline but similar to those produced by ad lib feeding. The effects of CCK on freezing did not differ from those of saline, whereas both CCK and LiCl had effects that were different from ad lib feeding. This pattern of results was also obtained when deprivation level during training and testing was reduced to 8 hr (Experiment 1A) and also when rats received small amounts of food in conjunction with CCK (Experiment 2). The intubation of a high-calorie stomach load (Experiment 1A) produced a response profile like that observed after free feeding. Freezing after LiCl treatment differed from that observed after free feeding and from that found after injection of CCK. The results indicate that rats can differentiate between the sensory consequences of the states produced by CCK, by LiCl, and by ad lib feeding.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 2833289     DOI: 10.1037//0735-7044.102.1.134

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Neurosci        ISSN: 0735-7044            Impact factor:   1.912


  3 in total

Review 1.  Behavioral controls of food intake.

Authors:  Stephen C Benoit; Andrea L Tracy
Journal:  Peptides       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 3.750

2.  Interoceptive "satiety" signals produced by leptin and CCK.

Authors:  Scott E Kanoski; Elwood K Walls; T L Davidson
Journal:  Peptides       Date:  2007-03-03       Impact factor: 3.750

Review 3.  Learned and cognitive controls of food intake.

Authors:  Stephen C Benoit; Jon F Davis; T L Davidson
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2010-06-16       Impact factor: 3.252

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.