OBJECTIVE: Epileptiform discharges, an electrophysiological hallmark of seizures, can propagate across cortical tissue in a manner similar to traveling waves. Recent work has focused attention on the origination and propagation patterns of these discharges, yielding important clues to their source location and mechanism of travel. However, systematic studies of methods for measuring propagation are lacking. APPROACH: We analyzed epileptiform discharges in microelectrode array recordings of human seizures. The array records multiunit activity and local field potentials at 400 micron spatial resolution, from a small cortical site free of obstructions. We evaluated several computationally efficient statistical methods for calculating traveling wave velocity, benchmarking them to analyses of associated neuronal burst firing. MAIN RESULTS: Over 90% of discharges met statistical criteria for propagation across the sampled cortical territory. Detection rate, direction and speed estimates derived from a multiunit estimator were compared to four field potential-based estimators: negative peak, maximum descent, high gamma power, and cross-correlation. Interestingly, the methods that were computationally simplest and most efficient (negative peak and maximal descent) offer non-inferior results in predicting neuronal traveling wave velocities compared to the other two, more complex methods. Moreover, the negative peak and maximal descent methods proved to be more robust against reduced spatial sampling challenges. Using least absolute deviation in place of least squares error minimized the impact of outliers, and reduced the discrepancies between local field potential-based and multiunit estimators. SIGNIFICANCE: Our findings suggest that ictal epileptiform discharges typically take the form of exceptionally strong, rapidly traveling waves, with propagation detectable across millimeter distances. The sequential activation of neurons in space can be inferred from clinically-observable EEG data, with a variety of straightforward computation methods available. This opens possibilities for systematic assessments of ictal discharge propagation in clinical and research settings.
OBJECTIVE:Epileptiform discharges, an electrophysiological hallmark of seizures, can propagate across cortical tissue in a manner similar to traveling waves. Recent work has focused attention on the origination and propagation patterns of these discharges, yielding important clues to their source location and mechanism of travel. However, systematic studies of methods for measuring propagation are lacking. APPROACH: We analyzed epileptiform discharges in microelectrode array recordings of humanseizures. The array records multiunit activity and local field potentials at 400 micron spatial resolution, from a small cortical site free of obstructions. We evaluated several computationally efficient statistical methods for calculating traveling wave velocity, benchmarking them to analyses of associated neuronal burst firing. MAIN RESULTS: Over 90% of discharges met statistical criteria for propagation across the sampled cortical territory. Detection rate, direction and speed estimates derived from a multiunit estimator were compared to four field potential-based estimators: negative peak, maximum descent, high gamma power, and cross-correlation. Interestingly, the methods that were computationally simplest and most efficient (negative peak and maximal descent) offer non-inferior results in predicting neuronal traveling wave velocities compared to the other two, more complex methods. Moreover, the negative peak and maximal descent methods proved to be more robust against reduced spatial sampling challenges. Using least absolute deviation in place of least squares error minimized the impact of outliers, and reduced the discrepancies between local field potential-based and multiunit estimators. SIGNIFICANCE: Our findings suggest that ictal epileptiform discharges typically take the form of exceptionally strong, rapidly traveling waves, with propagation detectable across millimeter distances. The sequential activation of neurons in space can be inferred from clinically-observable EEG data, with a variety of straightforward computation methods available. This opens possibilities for systematic assessments of ictal discharge propagation in clinical and research settings.
Authors: Jonathan Viventi; Dae-Hyeong Kim; Leif Vigeland; Eric S Frechette; Justin A Blanco; Yun-Soung Kim; Andrew E Avrin; Vineet R Tiruvadi; Suk-Won Hwang; Ann C Vanleer; Drausin F Wulsin; Kathryn Davis; Casey E Gelber; Larry Palmer; Jan Van der Spiegel; Jian Wu; Jianliang Xiao; Yonggang Huang; Diego Contreras; John A Rogers; Brian Litt Journal: Nat Neurosci Date: 2011-11-13 Impact factor: 24.884
Authors: C Alvarado-Rojas; M Valderrama; A Fouad-Ahmed; H Feldwisch-Drentrup; M Ihle; C A Teixeira; F Sales; A Schulze-Bonhage; C Adam; A Dourado; S Charpier; V Navarro; M Le Van Quyen Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2014-04-01 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Andrew K Tryba; Edward M Merricks; Somin Lee; Tuan Pham; SungJun Cho; Douglas R Nordli; Tahra L Eissa; Robert R Goodman; Guy M McKhann; Ronald G Emerson; Catherine A Schevon; Wim van Drongelen Journal: J Neurophysiol Date: 2019-08-28 Impact factor: 2.714
Authors: Catherine A Schevon; Steven Tobochnik; Tahra Eissa; Edward Merricks; Brian Gill; R Ryley Parrish; Lisa M Bateman; Guy M McKhann; Ronald G Emerson; Andrew J Trevelyan Journal: Neurobiol Dis Date: 2019-03-18 Impact factor: 5.996
Authors: Jonathan K Kleen; Benjamin A Speidel; Maxime O Baud; Vikram R Rao; Simon G Ammanuel; Liberty S Hamilton; Edward F Chang; Robert C Knowlton Journal: Epilepsia Date: 2021-02-26 Impact factor: 5.864
Authors: Emily D Schlafly; François A Marshall; Edward M Merricks; Uri T Eden; Sydney S Cash; Catherine A Schevon; Mark A Kramer Journal: J Neurosci Date: 2022-07-29 Impact factor: 6.709
Authors: Steven Tobochnik; Lisa M Bateman; Cigdem I Akman; Deepti Anbarasan; Carl W Bazil; Michelle Bell; Hyunmi Choi; Neil A Feldstein; Paul F Kent; Danielle McBrian; Guy M McKhann; Anil Mendiratta; Alison M Pack; Tristan T Sands; Sameer A Sheth; Shraddha Srinivasan; Catherine A Schevon Journal: J Clin Neurophysiol Date: 2021-02-08 Impact factor: 2.590
Authors: Jyun-You Liou; Elliot H Smith; Lisa M Bateman; Samuel L Bruce; Guy M McKhann; Robert R Goodman; Ronald G Emerson; Catherine A Schevon; L F Abbott Journal: Elife Date: 2020-03-23 Impact factor: 8.140
Authors: Joshua M Diamond; Benjamin E Diamond; Michael S Trotta; Kate Dembny; Sara K Inati; Kareem A Zaghloul Journal: Brain Date: 2021-07-28 Impact factor: 13.501