Literature DB >> 28332461

Global public goods for health: weaknesses and opportunities in the global health system.

Suerie Moon1, John-Arne Røttingen2, Julio Frenk3.   

Abstract

Since at least the 1990s, there has been growing recognition that societies need global public goods (GPGs) in order to protect and promote public health. While the term GPG is sometimes used loosely to denote that which is 'good' for the global public, we restrict our use of the term to its technical definition (goods that are non-excludable and non-rival in consumption) for its useful analytical clarity. Examples of important GPGs for health include standards and guidelines, research on the causes and treatment of disease, and comparative evidence and analysis. While institutions for providing public goods are relatively well developed at the national level - being clearly recognized as a responsibility of sovereign states - institutional arrangements to do so remain fragmented and thin at the global level. For example, the World Health Organization, mandated to provide many GPGs, is not appropriately financed to do so. Three steps are needed to better govern the financing and provision of GPGs for health: first, improved data to develop a clearer picture of how much money is currently going to providing which types of GPGs; second, a legitimate global political process to decide upon priority missing GPGs, followed by estimates of total amounts needed; and third, financing streams for GPGs from governments and private sources, to be channeled through new or existing institutions. Financing should go toward fully financing some GPGs, complementing or supplementing existing national or international financing for others, or deploying funds to make potential GPGs less 'excludable' by putting them into the public domain. As globalization deepens the degree of interdependence between countries and as formerly low-income economies advance, there may be less relative need for development assistance to meet basic health care needs, and greater relative need to finance GPGs. Strengthening global arrangements for GPGs today is a worthy investment for improved global health in the years to come.

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28332461     DOI: 10.1017/S1744133116000451

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Econ Policy Law        ISSN: 1744-1331


  7 in total

1.  Reimagining Global Health Governance in the Age of COVID-19.

Authors:  Lawrence O Gostin; Suerie Moon; Benjamin Mason Meier
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Responsible nudging for social good: new healthcare skills for AI-driven digital personal assistants.

Authors:  Marianna Capasso; Steven Umbrello
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2021-11-25

3.  Vaccine nationalism will persist: global public goods need effective engagement of global citizens.

Authors:  Stuart J Peacock
Journal:  Global Health       Date:  2022-02-12       Impact factor: 4.185

4.  Health as a "global public good": creating a market for pandemic risk.

Authors:  Felix Stein; Devi Sridhar
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2017-08-31

5.  A New World Health Era.

Authors:  Ariel Pablos-Méndez; Mario C Raviglione
Journal:  Glob Health Sci Pract       Date:  2018-03-30

6.  Claiming Health as a Public Good in the Post-COVID-19 Era.

Authors:  Salma M Abdalla; Nason Maani; Catherine K Ettman; Sandro Galea
Journal:  Development (Rome)       Date:  2020-11-10

7.  Public Risk-Taking and Rewards During the COVID-19 Pandemic - A Case Study of Remdesivir in the Context of Global Health Equity.

Authors:  Sabrina Wimmer; Sarai M Keestra
Journal:  Int J Health Policy Manag       Date:  2022-05-01
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.