| Literature DB >> 28332368 |
Mi Ri Suh1, Kyung A Lee2, Eun Young Kim1, Jiho Jung1, Won Ah Choi1, Seong Woong Kang3.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) and Becker muscular dystrophy (BMD) are similar genetic disorders whose patterns of mutation and disease phenotypes might be expected to show differences among different countries. We analyzed multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) data in a large number of Korean patients with DMD/BMD.Entities:
Keywords: Becker muscular dystrophy; Duchenne muscular dystrophy; female carrier; multiple ligation-dependent probe amplification
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28332368 PMCID: PMC5368148 DOI: 10.3349/ymj.2017.58.3.613
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Yonsei Med J ISSN: 0513-5796 Impact factor: 2.759
Fig. 1Asterisks (*) show patients who were diagnosed with other neuromuscular diseases. Among them, 16 patients had unspecified myopathy. MLPA, multiple ligation-dependent probe amplification; DMD, Duchenne muscular dystrophy; BMD, Becker muscular dystrophy; del, deletion; dup, duplication.
Fig. 2Plotting of mutations detected by MLPA. A significant hot spot region is visible between exons 44 and 55. The most common deletion site in patients with DMD is shown at exon 49–50 (7 cases, black indicator), followed by exons 46–47 (5 cases, white arrowhead), exon 45 and 51 (black arrowheads). The most common deletion site in patients with BMD is shown at exons 45–47 (7 cases, grey indicator). DMD, Duchenne muscular dystrophy; BMD, Becker muscular dystrophy; MLPA, multiple ligation-dependent amplification.
Fig. 3Cumulative numbers of each exon showing deletion/duplication events. Numbers of subjects showing deletions/duplications in each exon were counted and plotted. For exon deletion, a significant hot spot region is visible between exons 44–55; the second most frequent hot spot is not significantly distinguishable. In the case of duplication, neither central nor proximal hot spot regions are clearly identifiable.
Proportion of DMD Gene Deletions/Duplications and Hot Spot Regions in MLPA-Related Studies
| Author (yr) | Nationality | Total no. of subjects | Deletion (%) | Duplication (%) | Central hot spot (%) | Proximal hot spot (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lalic, et al. (2005) | Serbia & Monte-negro | 133 (98 DMD/35 BMD) | 78/133 (58.6)* | 9/133 (6.8)* | Not commented | Not commented |
| Hwa, et al. (2007) | Taiwan | 102 (89 DMD+BMD/13 carrier) | 36/102 (35.3)† | 26/102 (25.5)† | 41–60 (42/72, 58.3)* | 0–20 (21/72, 29.2)* |
| 32/89 (36.0)‡ | 22/89 (24.7)‡ | |||||
| Lee, et al. (2012) | Korea | 35 (25 DMD/4 BMD/6 carrier) | 5/11 (45.5)‡ | 3/11 (27.2)‡ | 44–55 (7/19, 52.9)* | 2–20 (3/19, 17.6)* |
| Uwineza, et al. (2014) | Rwanda | 12 (6 DMD+BMD/6 carriers) | 4/6 (66.7)‡ | Not commented | Not commented | Not commented |
| Chen et al. (2014) | China | 119 (119 DMD) | 64/81 (79.0)* | 16/81 (19.8)* | 43–55 | 3–21 |
| Manjunath, et al. (2015) | India | 83 (83 DMD) | 66/83 (79.5)* | 6/83 (7.2)* | 44–55 (54.8) | 2–20 (8.3) |
DMD, Duchenne muscular dystrophy; BMD, Becker muscular dystrophy; MLPA, multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplication.
*Percentage was calculated from those with positive MLPA results, †Percentage was calculated from those who underwent MLPA analysis, ‡Percentage was calculated from only the DMD/BMD patients who underwent MLPA analysis, excluding the data from female carriers.