Literature DB >> 28332335

Second- to third-trimester longitudinal growth assessment for prediction of small-for-gestational age and late fetal growth restriction.

J Caradeux1,2, E Eixarch1,3, E Mazarico1, T R Basuki1, E Gratacós1,3, F Figueras1,3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Detection of fetal growth restriction (FGR) remains poor and most screening strategies rely on cross-sectional evaluation of fetal size during the third trimester. A longitudinal and individualized approach has been proposed as an alternative method of evaluation. The aim of this study was to compare second- to third-trimester longitudinal growth assessment to cross-sectional evaluation in the third trimester for the prediction of small-for-gestational age (SGA) and late FGR in low-risk singleton pregnancy.
METHODS: This was a prospective cohort study of 2696 unselected consecutive low-risk singleton pregnancies scanned at 21 ± 2 and 32 ± 2 weeks. For cross-sectional growth assessment, abdominal circumference (AC) measurements were transformed to z-values according the 21st-INTERGROWTH standards. Longitudinal growth assessment was performed by calculating the AC z-velocity and the second- to third-trimester AC conditional growth centile. Longitudinal assessment was compared with cross-sectional assessment at 32 weeks. Association of cross-sectional and longitudinal evaluations with SGA and late FGR was assessed by logistic regression analysis. Predictive performance was determined by receiver-operating characteristics curve analysis. RESULT: In total, 210 (7.8%) newborns were classified as SGA and 103 (3.8%) as late FGR. Neither longitudinal measurement improved the association with SGA or late FGR provided by cross-sectional evaluation of AC z-score at 32 weeks. Areas under the curves of AC z-velocity and conditional AC growth were significantly smaller than those of cross-sectional AC z-scores (P < 0.001), although AC z-velocity performed significantly better than did conditional AC growth (P < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: Longitudinal assessment of fetal growth from the second to third trimester has a low predictive capacity for SGA and late FGR in low-risk singleton pregnancy compared with cross-sectional growth evaluation.
Copyright © 2017 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. Copyright © 2017 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Keywords:  fetal growth; fetal growth restriction; longitudinal growth; small-for-gestational age; ultrasound

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 28332335     DOI: 10.1002/uog.17471

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0960-7692            Impact factor:   7.299


  3 in total

Review 1.  Fetal Growth Restriction Prediction: How to Move beyond.

Authors:  Debora F B Leite; Jose G Cecatti
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2019-08-21

Review 2.  Molecular Pathways of Cellular Senescence and Placental Aging in Late Fetal Growth Restriction and Stillbirth.

Authors:  Anna Kajdy; Jan Modzelewski; Aneta Cymbaluk-Płoska; Ewa Kwiatkowska; Magdalena Bednarek-Jędrzejek; Dariusz Borowski; Katarzyna Stefańska; Michał Rabijewski; Andrzej Torbé; Sebastian Kwiatkowski
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-04-18       Impact factor: 5.923

3.  Accelerations of the Fetal Heart Rate in the Screening for Fetal Growth Restriction at 34-38 Week's Gestation.

Authors:  H J Odendaal; I C Crockart; C Du Plessis; L Brink; C A Groenewald
Journal:  Glob J Pediatr Neonatal Care       Date:  2021-10-30
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.