| Literature DB >> 28332287 |
T P P van den Bosch1, L B Hilbrands2, R Kraaijeveld1, N H R Litjens1, F Rezaee3, D Nieboer4,5, E W Steyerberg4,5, J A van Gestel1, D L Roelen6, M C Clahsen-van Groningen7, C C Baan1, A T Rowshani1.
Abstract
Acute rejection is one of the major immunological determinants of kidney graft function and survival. Early biomarkers to predict rejection are lacking. Emerging evidence reveals a crucial role for the monocyte/macrophage lineage cells in the pathogenesis of rejection. We hypothesized that higher pretransplant numbers of proinflammatory CD16+ monocytes can predict rejection. The study cohort consisted of 104 kidney transplant recipients (58 with no rejection and 46 with biopsy-proven rejection) and 33 healthy persons. Posttransplant median follow-up time was 14.7 mo (interquartile range 0.3-34 mo). Pretransplantation blood samples were analyzed by flow cytometry for monocyte immunophenotypes. Groups were compared by Cox regression models for the occurrence of acute rejection. We documented a significantly increased absolute number of pretransplant CD16+ monocytes in patients who developed biopsy-proven rejection after transplantation compared with those with no rejection (hazard ratio [HR] 1.60, 95% CI 1.28-2.00, p < 0.001) and healthy persons (HR 1.47, 95% CI 1.18-1.82, p < 0.001). In parallel, significantly fewer absolute numbers of CD16- monocytes were observed at pretransplant time points in rejectors versus nonrejectors (HR 0.74, 95% CI 0.58-0.94, p < 0,014). A higher pretransplant number of CD16+ monocytes is significantly associated with a higher risk of acute rejection after kidney transplantation.Entities:
Keywords: basic (laboratory) research/science; flow cytometry; immunobiology; kidney (allograft) function/dysfunction; kidney transplantation/nephrology; macrophage/monocyte biology: activation; macrophage/monocyte biology: trafficking; pathology/histopathology; rejection; translational research/science
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28332287 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.14280
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Am J Transplant ISSN: 1600-6135 Impact factor: 8.086