Literature DB >> 28332057

The Impact of Operative Approach on Postoperative Complications Following Colectomy for Colon Caner.

Benedetto Mungo1, Christina M Papageorge2, Miloslawa Stem1, Daniela Molena1,3, Anne O Lidor4,5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Colectomy is one of the most common major abdominal procedures performed in the USA. A better understanding of risk factors and the effect of operative approach on adverse postoperative outcomes may significantly improve quality of care.
METHODS: Adult patients with a primary diagnosis of colon cancer undergoing colectomy were selected from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program 2013-2015 targeted colectomy database. Patients were stratified into five groups based on specific operative approach. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to compare the five groups and identify risk factors for 30-day anastomotic leak, readmission, and mortality.
RESULTS: In total, 25,097 patients were included in the study, with a 3.32% anastomotic leak rate, 1.20% mortality rate, and 9.57% readmission rate. After adjusting for other factors, open surgery and conversion to open significantly increased the odds for leak, mortality, and readmission compared to laparoscopy. Additionally, smoking and chemotherapy increased the risk for leak and readmission, while total resection was associated with increased mortality and leak.
CONCLUSIONS: Operative approach and several other potentially modifiable perioperative factors have a significant impact on risk for adverse postoperative outcomes following colectomy. To improve quality of care for these patients, efforts should be made to identify and minimize the influence of such risk factors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28332057     DOI: 10.1007/s00268-017-4001-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


  20 in total

1.  Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial.

Authors:  Ruben Veldkamp; Esther Kuhry; Wim C J Hop; J Jeekel; G Kazemier; H Jaap Bonjer; Eva Haglind; Lars Påhlman; Miguel A Cuesta; Simon Msika; Mario Morino; Antonio M Lacy
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 41.316

2.  Is minimally invasive colon resection better than traditional approaches?: First comprehensive national examination with propensity score matching.

Authors:  Yen-Yi Juo; Omar Hyder; Adil H Haider; Melissa Camp; Anne Lidor; Nita Ahuja
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 14.766

3.  Utility and short-term outcomes of hand-assisted laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a single-institution experience in 1103 patients.

Authors:  Robert R Cima; Rajesh Pendlimari; Stefan D Holubar; Jirawat Pattana-Arun; David W Larson; Eric J Dozois; Bruce G Wolff; John H Pemberton
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 4.585

4.  Determinants of 30-d readmission after colectomy.

Authors:  Afif N Kulaylat; Peter W Dillon; Christopher S Hollenbeak; David B Stewart
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2014-09-30       Impact factor: 2.192

5.  Clinical and financial impact of hospital readmissions after colorectal resection: predictors, outcomes, and costs.

Authors:  Rachelle N Damle; Nicole B Cherng; Julie M Flahive; Jennifer S Davids; Justin A Maykel; Paul R Sturrock; W Brian Sweeney; Karim Alavi
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 4.585

6.  Minimally invasive surgery is underutilized for colon cancer.

Authors:  Celia N Robinson; G John Chen; Courtney J Balentine; Shubhada Sansgiry; Christy L Marshall; Daniel A Anaya; Avo Artinyan; Daniel Albo; David H Berger
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2011-01-07       Impact factor: 5.344

7.  Smoking and alcohol abuse are major risk factors for anastomotic leakage in colorectal surgery.

Authors:  L T Sørensen; T Jørgensen; L T Kirkeby; J Skovdal; B Vennits; P Wille-Jørgensen
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 6.939

8.  Conversion of laparoscopic colon resection does not affect survival in colon cancer.

Authors:  Jan Franko; Steven A Fassler; Masoud Rezvani; Brendan G O'Connell; Steven G Harper; Joseph H Nejman; D Mark Zebley
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-02-23       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer.

Authors:  Heidi Nelson; Daniel J Sargent; H Sam Wieand; James Fleshman; Mehran Anvari; Steven J Stryker; Robert W Beart; Michael Hellinger; Richard Flanagan; Walter Peters; David Ota
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-05-13       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Risk factors for anastomotic leakage and leak-related mortality after colonic cancer surgery in a nationwide audit.

Authors:  I S Bakker; I Grossmann; D Henneman; K Havenga; T Wiggers
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 6.939

View more
  3 in total

1.  Minimally invasive colectomy is associated with reduced risk of anastomotic leak and other major perioperative complications and reduced hospital resource utilization as compared with open surgery: a retrospective population-based study of comparative effectiveness and trends of surgical approach.

Authors:  David Wei; Stephen Johnston; Laura Goldstein; Deborah Nagle
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-05-14       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Predictive factors for anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic colorectal surgery.

Authors:  Antonio Sciuto; Giovanni Merola; Giovanni D De Palma; Maurizio Sodo; Felice Pirozzi; Umberto M Bracale; Umberto Bracale
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-06-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 3.  The triune of intestinal microbiome, genetics and inflammatory status and its impact on the healing of lower gastrointestinal anastomoses.

Authors:  Jou A Lee; Timothy J A Chico; Stephen A Renshaw
Journal:  FEBS J       Date:  2017-12-22       Impact factor: 5.542

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.