| Literature DB >> 28331241 |
Michael L Prendergast1, Elizabeth A Hall1, Jason Grossman1, Robert Veliz1, Liliana Gregorio1, Umme S Warda1, Kory Van Unen1, Chloe Knight2.
Abstract
This study is a randomized effectiveness trial of the use of incentives to improve treatment utilization among parolees in community treatment. In prison, Admission phase parolees were randomized to Admission Incentive (N=31) or Education (N=29). Attendance phase parolees entering community treatment were randomized to Attendance Incentive (N=104) or Education (N=98). There was no main effect for incentives in either study phase. Neither admission to community treatment (Incentive 60%, Education 64%; p =.74), nor intervention completion (Incentive 22%; Education 27%; p =.46) appeared to be impacted. Time-in-treatment was predicted by age, first arrest age, and type of parole status (Cox regression p<.05), but not by treatment group. Providing incentives did not increase the likelihood that parolees enrolled in or stayed in community treatment. In light of this finding, criminal justice practitioners who are considering incentives to increase admission or retention should be aware that they may not produce the desired outcomes.Entities:
Year: 2015 PMID: 28331241 PMCID: PMC5358665 DOI: 10.1177/0093854815592914
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Crim Justice Behav ISSN: 0093-8548