| Literature DB >> 28331221 |
Atsuki Fukutani1,2, Jun Misaki3, Tadao Isaka4.
Abstract
Because it is difficult to measure tendon length changes directly in humans, tendon length changes during dynamic movement have been evaluated indirectly from changes in muscle fascicle length and joint angle. The purpose of this study was to examine the validity of the indirect method. Twitch contractions of the ankle plantar flexors were evoked isometrically in eight subjects. Twitch contractions evoked by singlet, doublet, and triplet stimulations were conducted at dorsiflexion 20° (DF20), plantar flexion 0° (PF0), and plantar flexion 20° (PF20). Muscle fascicle length and pennation angle were recorded by ultrasonography. The magnitude of muscle fascicle shortening was significantly smaller in DF20 than in PF0 and PF20, although the magnitude of joint torque was significantly larger in DF20 than in PF0 and PF20. Theoretically, the magnitude of tendon elongation is expected to be larger in larger joint torque conditions. However, we found that the magnitude of tendon elongation evaluated from muscle fascicle shortening was larger in a lower joint torque condition (PF20). These results suggest that the magnitude of muscle fascicle shortening does not necessarily represent tendon elongation. The larger muscle fascicle shortening in PF20 may be partly caused by eliminating slack of the muscle-tendon complex.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28331221 PMCID: PMC5428451 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-00485-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Mean twitch torque among joint angles and conditions. Mean twitch torque ± SD were plotted against twitch contraction at a given joint angle: DF20, white squares; PF0, white triangles; PF20, black circles. (a) Significant difference between DF20 and PF0 (P < 0.05). (b) Significant difference between DF20 and PF20 (P < 0.05). (c) Significant difference between PF0 and PF20 (P < 0.05). *Significant difference among conditions in DF20 (P < 0.05); #Significant difference among conditions in PF0 (P < 0.05); †Significant difference among conditions in PF20 (P < 0.05).
Figure 2Fascicle shortening among joint angles and conditions. Mean fascicle length ± SD measured at each twitch contraction condition: DF20, white squares; PF0, white triangles; PF20, black circles. (a) Significant difference between DF20 and PF0 (P < 0.05). (b) Significant difference between DF20 and PF20 (P < 0.05). *Significant difference among conditions (P < 0.05).
Figure 3Schematic representation of the interaction between slack and/or curved shape and muscle fascicle shortening at a given ankle joint angle.
Figure 4Illustration of how muscle fascicle length and pennation angle are measured.