Literature DB >> 28331135

Applicability of 3-Dimensional Quantitative Coronary Angiography-Derived Computed Fractional Flow Reserve for Intermediate Coronary Stenosis.

Kyoichiro Yazaki1, Masato Otsuka1, Shohei Kataoka1, Mitsuru Kahata1, Asako Kumagai1, Koji Inoue1, Hiroshi Koganei1, Kenji Enta1, Yasuhiro Ishii1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Quantitative flow ratio (QFR) is a newly developed image-based index for estimating fractional flow reserve (FFR).Methods and 
Results: We analyzed 151 coronary arteries with intermediate stenosis in 142 patients undergoing wire-based FFR measurement using dedicated software. Predefined contrast flow QFR, which was derived from 3-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography (3-D QCA) withThrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) frame counts, was compared with FFR as a reference. QFR had good correlation (r=0.80, P<0.0001) and agreement (mean difference: 0.01±0.05) with FFR. After applying the FFR cut-off ≤0.8, the overall accuracy rate of QFR ≤0.8 was 88.0%. On receiver operating characteristics analysis, the area under the curve was 0.93 for QFR. In contrast, 3-D QCA-derived anatomical indices had insufficient correlation with FFR and diagnostic performance compared with QFR.
CONCLUSIONS: QFR had good correlation and agreement with FFR and high diagnostic performance in the evaluation of intermediate coronary stenosis, suggesting that QFR may be an alternative tool for estimating myocardial ischemia.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography; Fractional flow reserve; Myocardial ischemia; Quantitative flow ratio

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28331135     DOI: 10.1253/circj.CJ-16-1261

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circ J        ISSN: 1346-9843            Impact factor:   2.993


  14 in total

1.  Reproducibility of quantitative flow ratio: An inter-core laboratory variability study.

Authors:  Yunxiao Chang; Liwei Chen; Jelmer Westra; Zhongwei Sun; Changdong Guan; Yimin Zhang; Daixin Ding; Bo Xu; Shengxian Tu
Journal:  Cardiol J       Date:  2018-09-20       Impact factor: 2.737

2.  Quantitative flow ratio derived from diagnostic coronary angiography in assessment of patients with intermediate coronary stenosis: a wire-free fractional flow reserve study.

Authors:  Łukasz Kołtowski; Martyna Zaleska; Jakub Maksym; Mariusz Tomaniak; Mateusz Soliński; Dominika Puchta; Niels R Holm; Grzegorz Opolski; Janusz Kochman
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2018-08-20       Impact factor: 5.460

3.  Evaluation of fractional flow reserve in patients with stable angina: can CT compete with angiography?

Authors:  Xin Liu; Yabin Wang; Heye Zhang; Youbing Yin; Kunlin Cao; Zhifan Gao; Huafeng Liu; William Kongto Hau; Lei Gao; Yundai Chen; Feng Cao; Wenhua Huang
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-03-18       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Comparison of quantitative flow ratio value of left anterior descending and circumflex coronary artery in patients with Takotsubo syndrome.

Authors:  Yuichi Ozaki; Nieves Gonzalo; Carlos Hernando Salazar; Kayode O Kuku; Hernán Mejía-Rentería; Alexandre Hideo-Kajita; Iván J Núñez-Gil; Javier Escaned; Ron Waksman; Hector M Garcia-Garcia
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 2.357

5.  Applicability of quantitative flow ratio for rapid evaluation of intermediate coronary stenosis: comparison with instantaneous wave-free ratio in clinical practice.

Authors:  Masahiro Watarai; Masato Otsuka; Kyoichiro Yazaki; Yusuke Inagaki; Mitsuru Kahata; Asako Kumagai; Koji Inoue; Hiroshi Koganei; Kenji Enta; Yasuhiro Ishii
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2019-06-26       Impact factor: 2.357

6.  Angiographic Lesion Morphology Provides Incremental Value to Generalize Quantitative Flow Ratio for Predicting Myocardial Ischemia.

Authors:  Jie Zhang; Na Zhao; Bo Xu; Lihua Xie; Weihua Yin; Yunqiang An; Hankun Yan; Yitong Yu; Bin Lu
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-06-06

7.  Feasibility and diagnostic reliability of quantitative flow ratio in the assessment of non-culprit lesions in acute coronary syndrome.

Authors:  Aslihan Erbay; Lisa Penzel; Youssef S Abdelwahed; Jens Klotsche; Anne-Sophie Schatz; Julia Steiner; Arash Haghikia; Ulf Landmesser; Barbara E Stähli; David M Leistner
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2021-03-02       Impact factor: 2.357

8.  CVIT expert consensus document on primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in 2018.

Authors:  Yukio Ozaki; Yuki Katagiri; Yoshinobu Onuma; Tetsuya Amano; Takashi Muramatsu; Ken Kozuma; Satoru Otsuji; Takafumi Ueno; Nobuo Shiode; Kazuya Kawai; Nobuhiro Tanaka; Kinzo Ueda; Takashi Akasaka; Keiichi Igarashi Hanaoka; Shiro Uemura; Hirotaka Oda; Yoshiaki Katahira; Kazushige Kadota; Eisho Kyo; Katsuhiko Sato; Tadaya Sato; Junya Shite; Koichi Nakao; Masami Nishino; Yutaka Hikichi; Junko Honye; Tetsuo Matsubara; Sumio Mizuno; Toshiya Muramatsu; Taku Inohara; Shun Kohsaka; Ichiro Michishita; Hiroyoshi Yokoi; Patrick W Serruys; Yuji Ikari; Masato Nakamura
Journal:  Cardiovasc Interv Ther       Date:  2018-03-29

9.  Diagnostic Performance of QFR for the Evaluation of Intermediate Coronary Artery Stenosis Confirmed by Fractional Flow Reserve.

Authors:  Zhenhua Xing; Junyu Pei; Jiabing Huang; Xinqun Hu; Shan Gao
Journal:  Braz J Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2019 Mar-Apr

10.  Angiography-Derived Fractional Flow Reserve: More or Less Physiology?

Authors:  Paul D Morris; Nick Curzen; Julian P Gunn
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2020-03-11       Impact factor: 5.501

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.