Literature DB >> 28331052

CPR decision making: why Winspear needs to be challenged?

Rosemarie Anthony-Pillai.   

Abstract

This is a personal view about the recent high court decision around cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). This opinion identifies that the judge failed to recognise the statutory role given to clinicians in identifying when a treatment is life sustaining. In failing to recognise the role of the clinician, the ruling in Winspear risks the likelihood of inappropriate CPR attempts. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/.

Keywords:  Capacity; Decision-making; End-of-life; Ethics; Legal Aspects

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28331052     DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2016-103628

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Ethics        ISSN: 0306-6800            Impact factor:   2.903


  1 in total

1.  Establishing Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Services in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Survey of Suggestions Made by Health Care Workers in Cross River State, Nigeria.

Authors:  Queeneth Ndukwe Kalu; Oboko Oboko Oku; Ini-Abasi Udo Ilori
Journal:  Open Access Maced J Med Sci       Date:  2018-05-19
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.