| Literature DB >> 28331052 |
Abstract
This is a personal view about the recent high court decision around cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). This opinion identifies that the judge failed to recognise the statutory role given to clinicians in identifying when a treatment is life sustaining. In failing to recognise the role of the clinician, the ruling in Winspear risks the likelihood of inappropriate CPR attempts. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/.Keywords: Capacity; Decision-making; End-of-life; Ethics; Legal Aspects
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28331052 DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2016-103628
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Med Ethics ISSN: 0306-6800 Impact factor: 2.903