Literature DB >> 28331033

Time to sputum culture conversion and treatment outcome of patients with multidrug-resistant tuberculosis: a prospective cohort study from urban China.

Peng Lu1,2, Qiao Liu3,2, Leonardo Martinez4,2, Haitao Yang1,5, Wei Lu3, Xiaoyan Ding3, Limei Zhu6.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28331033      PMCID: PMC5380874          DOI: 10.1183/13993003.01558-2016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Respir J        ISSN: 0903-1936            Impact factor:   16.671


× No keyword cloud information.
To the Editor: Sputum culture plays an important role in monitoring treatment response in patients with multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB), and sputum culture conversion is a clinical tool used to predict therapeutic efficacy [1]. Monthly culture monitoring is essential for earlier detection of treatment failure in patients with MDR-TB. More sensitive signals of nonresponse would further avoid adverse outcomes [2]. Evidence exists suggesting that sputum culture conversion after 2 months of treatment may be an early predictor of treatment success in patients with MDR-TB [3, 4]. Although sputum culture conversion has been used substantially in clinical settings, few prospective cohort studies have investigated its efficacy after different durations of MDR-TB treatment, and no studies have been performed in China or India [5, 6]. We evaluated whether 2-, 3-, 6- or 24-month culture conversion predicted treatment success in patients with MDR-TB. The study was conducted in four cities (Xuzhou, Lianyungang, Zhenjiang and Nantong) in Jiangsu province, China. Xuzhou and Lianyungang, both located in the north of Jiangsu province, are economically underdeveloped areas with a higher TB burden while Zhenjiang, situated in the south, is a relatively rich city with a lighter TB burden, and Nantong, located in the middle of Jiangsu, is a middle-income developed city with a moderate TB burden [7]. All patients with MDR-TB were enrolled consecutively between December 2011 and March 2014. Patients with MDR-TB were identified at the time of diagnosis by regional reference laboratories using traditional drug sensitivity tests (DST), as previously described [8]. Patients whose sputum culture was negative at baseline were excluded. Once confirmed, every patient signed an informed consent form, after which a questionnaire designed by local investigators was administered to gather important demographic and clinical information. Sputum culture was performed monthly. World Health Organization guidelines were consulted when defining study covariates and outcomes. Patients with MDR-TB were participants with Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates resistance to at least isoniazid and rifampicin. A positive sputum culture was defined as Mycobacterium tuberculosis colony growth and a negative sputum culture as no colony growth [9]. Sputum culture conversion was defined as two consecutive negative cultures, collected at least 30 days apart. Sputum culture reversion to positive was defined as one or more subsequent positive results after initial conversion. Sensitivity was defined as the proportion of patients with sputum culture conversion among those with treatment success. Specificity was defined as the proportion of patients with nonconversion of sputum culture among those with poor outcome. Sensitivity of culture conversion was used as a predictor of treatment success and specificity of lack of culture conversion as a predictor of failure/death. Final outcomes included success, failure and death. End-of-treatment success was defined as completion of treatment or cure. Adverse outcomes were treatment failure or death. Sputum smear grading was as follows: 1+ (3–9 acid-fast bacilli (AFB) in 100 fields), 2+ (1–9 AFB in 10 fields), 3+ (1–9 AFB in 1 field) and 4+ (≥10 AFB in 1 field). Smear grade was dichotomised ≤1 (included smear-negative and 1+) and >1 (included smear-positive 2+, 3+, 4+). Cox proportional hazards modelling was used to estimate hazard ratios, with sputum culture conversion as the end-point. Kaplan–Meier survival curves were plotted (not shown), and differences between groups were estimated by the log-rank test. Odds ratios and Chi-squared tests were used to determine associations between conversion and treatment outcome. Of 160 patients with pulmonary MDR-TB enrolled, 139 had recorded treatment outcomes. Median age was 51 (interquartile range (IQR) 35.8–60.0) years; median weight was 60 (IQR 53.0–65.0) kg; 99 (71.4%) were male; 65 (46.8%) had smoked previously or were current smokers at the time of treatment, and 26 (18.7%) drank alcohol. Of 139 patients with MDR-TB, 84 (60.4%) patients had a successful treatment outcome and 55 (39.6%) either experienced treatment failure or died. In all, 106 (76.3%) patients had sputum culture conversion. Median time to culture conversion among those who converted was 159 (IQR 127–212) days. Overall, the median sputum culture conversion time of patients with successful treatment outcomes was 92 days (95% CI 85–99 days), which was much shorter (p<0.001) than for the patients with treatment failure or death (174 days, 95% CI 0–513). 2-month conversion was not statistically significantly associated with treatment success (p=0.087). However, patients who converted sputum culture at 3 (p=0.007), 6 (p<0.001) and 24 months (p<0.001) had increased odds of treatment success compared to nonconverters. The overall sensitivity of sputum culture conversion at 2, 3, 6 and 24 months was 33.3%, 52.4%, 90.5% and 95.2%, respectively. The specificity of these markers was 80.0%, 70.9%, 56.4% and 52.7%, respectively (table 1).
TABLE 1

Association of sputum culture conversion status with treatment outcome (success versus failure or death)

Month of treatment#Failure/deathSuccessOdds ratio (95% CI)p-valueSensitivity (95% CI)Specificity (95% CI)PPV (95% CI)NPV (95% CI)
2 months33.3 (23.4–44.5)80.0 (67.0–89.6)71.8 (55.1–85.0)44.0 (34.1–54.3)
 Did not convert44 (80.0)56 (66.7)1 (reference)
 Converted11 (20.0)28 (33.3)2.0 (0.9–4.5)0.087
3 months52.4 (41.2–63.4)70.9 (57.1–82.4)73.3 (60.3–83.9)49.4 (37.9–60.9)
 Did not convert39 (70.9)40 (47.6)1 (reference)
 Converted16 (29.1)44 (52.4)2.7 (1.3–5.5)0.007
6 months90.5 (82.1–95.8)56.4 (42.3–69.7)76.0 (66.4–84.0)79.5 (63.5–90.7)
 Did not convert31 (56.4)8 (9.5)1 (reference)
 Converted24 (43.6)76 (90.5)12.3 (5.0 –30.3)<0.001
24 months95.2 (88.3–98.7)52.7 (38.8–66.3)75.5 (66.2–83.3)87.9 (71.8–96.6)
 Did not convert29 (52.7)4 (4.8)1 (reference)
 Converted26 (47.3)80 (95.2)22.3 (7.2–69.4)<0.001

Data are presented as n (%), unless otherwise stated. #: sputum culture conversion was defined as two consecutive negative cultures after the first sputum sample, collected at least 30 days apart. PPV: positive predictive value; NPV: negative predictive value.

Association of sputum culture conversion status with treatment outcome (success versus failure or death) Data are presented as n (%), unless otherwise stated. #: sputum culture conversion was defined as two consecutive negative cultures after the first sputum sample, collected at least 30 days apart. PPV: positive predictive value; NPV: negative predictive value. Earlier detection of participant nonresponse to treatment may allow clinicians to adjust treatment protocols and, subsequently, avoid poor outcomes [10]. A recent study conducted by Mitnick et al. [2] demonstrated that monthly sputum culture outperformed bimonthly collection of sputum smear and culture in detecting patients with MDR-TB that failed treatment. These findings highlight the specific value of performing a prospective cohort study to investigate the efficacy of sputum culture conversion after different durations of MDR-TB treatment. Anti-TB pharmacological treatment is adjusted according to the culture conversion of patients, resulting in decreased rates of adverse effects by reducing the number of given injectable drugs [11]. Furthermore, prolonging conversion time may increase the chance that patients transmit TB to other individuals in their social network. Therefore, sputum culture conversion has not only clinical significance but also important public health relevance. In the current study, sputum culture conversion at 2 months was not statistically associated with treatment success, whereas patients with sputum culture conversion at 3, 6 and 24 months had a significantly higher likelihood of treatment success compared with those who did not convert. Data from 12 randomised trials of patients with drug-susceptible tuberculosis suggested that 3-month culture conversion was superior to 2-month conversion as a surrogate for poor treatment outcome, but neither were ideal [12]. Although 2-month culture conversion is generally considered an early predictor of treatment success in patients with MDR-TB, its low sensitivity in detecting long-term treatment success is a cause for concern. A recent study by Kurbatova et al. [9] suggested that the overall association between culture conversion and treatment success is substantially stronger at 6 months compared with 2 months due to higher sensitivity. Our study corroborates this finding and also shows substantially lower specificity when evaluating treatment success at 6-versus 2-month culture conversion (specificity, 56.4% versus 80.0%). Our results suggest an intricate balance between high and low sensitivity and specificity, depending on the time point at which sputum culture testing occurs. The low sensitivity at 2- and 3-month culture conversion suggests that many patients would be misclassified as having failed treatment, thereby underestimating overall therapeutic efficacy. Furthermore, such misclassification would result in replacement of effective drugs and termination of a potentially successful drug regimen. In our study, sputum culture conversion at 2 months had a sensitivity of 33.3%, indicating that 66.7% of patients would be misclassified. However, the specificity for sputum culture conversion at the end of 6 months of treatment was 56.4%, indicating that 43.6% of patients would be misclassified as effectively treated. These results indicate that missed opportunities to replace a more effective drug regimen for patients failing treatment is common, and may contribute to high death rates among patients with drug-resistant tuberculosis. Surrogate end-points should take into account the balance between predicting treatment success and failure accurately during treatment of drug resistance [9]. In our study, time to sputum culture conversion at 6 months was significantly associated with end-of-treatment outcomes. The high combined sensitivity and specificity was reached for sputum culture conversion status assessed at 6 months of treatment. Given the average 50–60% prevalence of treatment success reported in MDR-TB cohorts worldwide [13, 14], PPVs were relatively high: 75.5% for 6-month sputum culture conversion. Sputum culture conversion at 6 months may be a crucial indication for trials conducted to determine a highly effective and inexpensive standardised treatment. In summary, our study suggests that sputum conversion at 6 months had a much higher sensitivity, but a substantially lower specificity, to predict MDR-TB treatment success compared with sputum conversion at 2 and 3 months.
  13 in total

1.  Multidrug-resistant and extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis: a threat to global control of tuberculosis.

Authors:  Neel R Gandhi; Paul Nunn; Keertan Dheda; H Simon Schaaf; Matteo Zignol; Dick van Soolingen; Paul Jensen; Jaime Bayona
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2010-05-22       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  WHO guidelines for the programmatic management of drug-resistant tuberculosis: 2011 update.

Authors:  D Falzon; E Jaramillo; H J Schünemann; M Arentz; M Bauer; J Bayona; L Blanc; J A Caminero; C L Daley; C Duncombe; C Fitzpatrick; A Gebhard; H Getahun; M Henkens; T H Holtz; J Keravec; S Keshavjee; A J Khan; R Kulier; V Leimane; C Lienhardt; C Lu; A Mariandyshev; G B Migliori; F Mirzayev; C D Mitnick; P Nunn; G Nwagboniwe; O Oxlade; D Palmero; P Pavlinac; M I Quelapio; M C Raviglione; M L Rich; S Royce; S Rüsch-Gerdes; A Salakaia; R Sarin; D Sculier; F Varaine; M Vitoria; J L Walson; F Wares; K Weyer; R A White; M Zignol
Journal:  Eur Respir J       Date:  2011-08-04       Impact factor: 16.671

3.  National survey of drug-resistant tuberculosis in China.

Authors:  Yanlin Zhao; Shaofa Xu; Lixia Wang; Daniel P Chin; Shengfen Wang; Guanglu Jiang; Hui Xia; Yang Zhou; Qiang Li; Xichao Ou; Yu Pang; Yuanyuan Song; Bing Zhao; Hongtao Zhang; Guangxue He; Jing Guo; Yu Wang
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-06-07       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 4.  Treatment outcomes among patients with multidrug-resistant tuberculosis: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Evan W Orenstein; Sanjay Basu; N Sarita Shah; Jason R Andrews; Gerald H Friedland; Anthony P Moll; Neel R Gandhi; Alison P Galvani
Journal:  Lancet Infect Dis       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 25.071

5.  Epidemiology of anti-tuberculosis drug resistance in a Chinese population: current situation and challenges ahead.

Authors:  Yan Shao; Dandan Yang; Weiguo Xu; Wei Lu; Honghuan Song; Yaoyao Dai; Hongbing Shen; Jianming Wang
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2011-02-17       Impact factor: 3.295

6.  Rates and risk factors for drug resistance tuberculosis in Northeastern China.

Authors:  Qiao Liu; Limei Zhu; Yan Shao; Honghuan Song; Guoli Li; Yang Zhou; Jinyan Shi; Chongqiao Zhong; Cheng Chen; Wei Lu
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2013-12-13       Impact factor: 3.295

7.  Multidrug-resistant tuberculosis treatment failure detection depends on monitoring interval and microbiological method.

Authors:  Carole D Mitnick; Richard A White; Chunling Lu; Carly A Rodriguez; Jaime Bayona; Mercedes C Becerra; Marcos Burgos; Rosella Centis; Theodore Cohen; Helen Cox; Lia D'Ambrosio; Manfred Danilovitz; Dennis Falzon; Irina Y Gelmanova; Maria T Gler; Jennifer A Grinsdale; Timothy H Holtz; Salmaan Keshavjee; Vaira Leimane; Dick Menzies; Giovanni Battista Migliori; Meredith B Milstein; Sergey P Mishustin; Marcello Pagano; Maria I Quelapio; Karen Shean; Sonya S Shin; Arielle W Tolman; Martha L van der Walt; Armand Van Deun; Piret Viiklepp
Journal:  Eur Respir J       Date:  2016-09-01       Impact factor: 16.671

8.  Sputum culture conversion as a prognostic marker for end-of-treatment outcome in patients with multidrug-resistant tuberculosis: a secondary analysis of data from two observational cohort studies.

Authors:  Ekaterina V Kurbatova; J Peter Cegielski; Christian Lienhardt; Rattanawadee Akksilp; Jaime Bayona; Mercedes C Becerra; Janice Caoili; Carmen Contreras; Tracy Dalton; Manfred Danilovits; Olga V Demikhova; Julia Ershova; Victoria M Gammino; Irina Gelmanova; Charles M Heilig; Ruwen Jou; Boris Kazennyy; Salmaan Keshavjee; Hee Jin Kim; Kai Kliiman; Charlotte Kvasnovsky; Vaira Leimane; Carole D Mitnick; Imelda Quelapio; Vija Riekstina; Sarah E Smith; Thelma Tupasi; Martie van der Walt; Irina A Vasilyeva; Laura E Via; Piret Viiklepp; Grigory Volchenkov; Allison Taylor Walker; Melanie Wolfgang; Martin Yagui; Matteo Zignol
Journal:  Lancet Respir Med       Date:  2015-02-26       Impact factor: 30.700

9.  An evaluation of culture results during treatment for tuberculosis as surrogate endpoints for treatment failure and relapse.

Authors:  Patrick P J Phillips; Katherine Fielding; Andrew J Nunn
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-08       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Predictors of two months culture conversion in multidrug-resistant tuberculosis: findings from a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Anila Basit; Nafees Ahmad; Amer Hayat Khan; Arshad Javaid; Syed Azhar Syed Sulaiman; Afsar Khan Afridi; Azreen Syazril Adnan; Israr ul Haq; Syed Saleem Shah; Ahmed Ahadi; Izaz Ahmad
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-04       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  14 in total

1.  Predictors of Time to Sputum Culture Conversion Among Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis Patients in Oromia Region Hospitals, Ethiopia.

Authors:  Yohannes Tekalegn; Demelash Woldeyohannes; Tesfaye Assefa; Rameto Aman; Biniyam Sahiledengle
Journal:  Infect Drug Resist       Date:  2020-07-27       Impact factor: 4.003

2.  Validity of Time to Sputum Culture Conversion to Predict Cure in Patients with Multidrug-Resistant Tuberculosis: A Retrospective Single-Center Study.

Authors:  Arshad Javaid; Nafees Ahmad; Afsar Khan Afridi; Anila Basit; Amer Hayat Khan; Izaz Ahmad; Muhammad Atif
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2018-03-29       Impact factor: 2.345

3.  Predicting the Outcomes of New Short-Course Regimens for Multidrug-Resistant Tuberculosis Using Intrahost and Pharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic Modeling.

Authors:  Tan N Doan; Pengxing Cao; Theophilus I Emeto; James M McCaw; Emma S McBryde
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2018-11-26       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Factors affecting time to sputum culture conversion and treatment outcome of patients with multidrug-resistant tuberculosis in China.

Authors:  Qiao Liu; Peng Lu; Leonardo Martinez; Haitao Yang; Wei Lu; Xiaoyan Ding; Limei Zhu
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 3.090

5.  Comparison of the validity of smear and culture conversion as a prognostic marker of treatment outcome in patients with multidrug-resistant tuberculosis.

Authors:  Kefyalew Addis Alene; Kerri Viney; Hengzhong Yi; Emma S McBryde; Kunyun Yang; Liqiong Bai; Darren J Gray; Zuhui Xu; Archie C A Clements
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-05-23       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Time to sputum smear and culture conversions in multidrug resistant tuberculosis at University of Gondar Hospital, Northwest Ethiopia.

Authors:  Agumas Shibabaw; Baye Gelaw; Shu-Hua Wang; Belay Tessema
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-06-26       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  A Retrospective Comparative Study on Median Time to Sputum Culture Conversion in Multi-Drug Resistant Pulmonary Tuberculosis Patients in Pastoral and Non-Pastoral Settings in Southeast Oromia, Ethiopia.

Authors:  Abebe Megerso; Negusie Deyessa; Godana Jarso; Alemayehu Worku
Journal:  Infect Drug Resist       Date:  2021-12-14       Impact factor: 4.003

8.  Predictors of unsuccessful interim treatment outcomes of multidrug resistant tuberculosis patients.

Authors:  Muhammad Atif; Arslan Bashir; Nafees Ahmad; Razia Kaneez Fatima; Sehar Saba; Shane Scahill
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2017-09-29       Impact factor: 3.090

9.  Sputum bacteriology conversion and treatment outcome of patients with multidrug-resistant tuberculosis.

Authors:  Lingshuang Lv; Tiecheng Li; Kun Xu; Peiyi Shi; Biyu He; Weimin Kong; Jianming Wang; Jian Sun
Journal:  Infect Drug Resist       Date:  2018-01-23       Impact factor: 4.003

10.  Time to sputum culture conversion and its predictors among patients with multidrug-resistant tuberculosis in Hangzhou, China: A retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Qingchun Li; Min Lu; Evelyn Hsieh; Limin Wu; Yifei Wu; Meng Wang; Le Wang; Gang Zhao; Li Xie; Han-Zhu Qian
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-12-11       Impact factor: 1.817

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.